Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, CaptCalvin said:

@jdm What he means is that he needed to fully open the regulating index for the slot at the bottom to line up with the hairspring in order for the hairspring to come free of the regulator index.

Well, as mentioned above that is not needed. What is moved is the entire regulator arm, but not the index.
From the Technical Guide:

remove-HS.thumb.PNG.ac3ea1b8b30f4d60d8b9657ef7b76e77.PNG

  • Thanks 1
Posted

I wanted to add that removing and (even more) installing this type of hairsprings is a delicate task.

So the OP as a beginner did well in doing that without damage, no matter the exact steps he followed. 

  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, jdm said:

Well, as mentioned above that is not needed. What is moved is the entire regulator arm, but not the index.
From the Technical Guide:

remove-HS.thumb.PNG.ac3ea1b8b30f4d60d8b9657ef7b76e77.PNG

I would say it's pretty needed, especially on the reinstall. Think about how difficult it would be to try to get the endcurve back through the slot if it was turned. The manual shows it fully opened in all steps. I think it just neglected to specify. Kudos to OP for taking this initiative.

Edited by CaptCalvin
Posted
That is quite a new concept, "practice on fine pieces because the cheap one may get you disappointed"? 

The focus in learning should be about developing dexterity, using the correct techniques and fully understand how parts typically function and behave when manipulated. Not going for quick satisfying results on valuable pieces.

So, my vote goes to getting cheap old Swiss, or Seiko, or new Chinese, depending on student's preferences. 

To this effect the OP going to his own nice watches right away has been a risk taking, but so far he managed to do good. I'd recommend anyway he gets a neglected Seiko 5 to further practice, simply because skill developing is based on repetition, and repeated manipulation is detrimental to a mov.t.

Ok. Such is democracy we each have our thoughts opinions and are entitled to voice them.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

"Don’t waste time trying to learn on cheap movements", I heard you, but I'm very new to this watchmaking hobby, even I can do very very tiny electronic SMD hand soldering, it doesn't mean I want to risk myself or a friend expensive timepiece, still need to train my dexterity ,new techniques and confidence
 
DarakC0376ACE-A469-4C28-AFCC-7FD5843A4A62.thumb.jpeg.d4e9c3b7500feaefcf3c55e1931a82f3.jpeg


Hello Darak, apologies for taking a while to respond to you, I have been away working. I was very lucky to have met a professional Horologist who lives near to me and spares time for me to learn from him. Prior to meeting this gentleman I spent 4 years as a self taught diy Horologist tinkering with cheap or dysfunctional movements I bought off eBay, usually £1 to £3 a pop. Yes, they taught me manual dexterity and manipulation of parts, I even managed to reform a few damaged hairsprings, to a degree. The best advice I was given by the professional Horologist , (and hence I passed it onto you) was to learn on movements of quality, ones which are runners.

JDMs response is I hope purely flippant. Of course most would not interpret my advice as “all newbies should start by only tearing down fine omega or Rolex time pieces”.

It is possible to find working, albeit uncased ETA or AS movements for example on eBay for as little as £5 to £10. The movement should be running beforehand. Stripping, cleaning, rebuilding and lubricating a non running watch yields no lessons learned or sense of achievement if the movement still turns out to be a non runner. I have learned horology is a journey and not a destination, and for me it was important to gain confidence through success.

Kind regards
Deggsie


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 1
Posted
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
11
6 minutes ago, Deggsie said:

Hello Darak, apologies for taking a while to respond to you, I have been away working. I was very lucky to have met a professional Horologist who lives near to me and spares time for me to learn from him. Prior to meeting this gentleman I spent 4 years as a self taught diy Horologist tinkering with cheap or dysfunctional movements I bought off eBay, usually £1 to £3 a pop. Yes, they taught me manual dexterity and manipulation of parts, I even managed to reform a few damaged hairsprings, to a degree. The best advice I was given by the professional Horologist , (and hence I passed it onto you) was to learn on movements of quality, ones which are runners.

JDMs response is I hope purely flippant. Of course most would not interpret my advice as “all newbies should start by only tearing down fine omega or Rolex time pieces”.

It is possible to find working, albeit uncased ETA or AS movements for example on eBay for as little as £5 to £10. The movement should be running beforehand. Stripping, cleaning, rebuilding and lubricating a non running watch yields no lessons learned or sense of achievement if the movement still turns out to be a non runner. I have learned horology is a journey and not a destination, and for me it was important to gain confidence through success.

Kind regards
Deggsie


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Hi Deggsie,

 

Thanks for your kind reply, I'm very jealous that you have someone can learn from, I'm learning by watching YouTube videos or community like here,  but still, I think I learn a lot good tips so far.

 

Darak

Posted

Don’t be jealous. My trainer keeps saying how it is important to make mistakes... that’s how you learn. But I wasn’t learning by practicing on broken cheap movements. [emoji53] Also he keeps saying don’t rush to be successful. Horology takes a lifetime to learn.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted
On 4/18/2019 at 6:46 AM, Darak said:

And yes, I always measure in six positions, and every time I change positions, I'll take it off and move the watch around, but this makes me think, some watchmaker uses auto timegrapher, means the timegrapher will move between positions by itself, does this means take the watch off and move it around is not necessary? 

Is not necessary, just wait 30 seconds between positions.

 

On 4/29/2019 at 11:59 PM, Deggsie said:

It is possible to find working, albeit uncased ETA or AS movements for example on eBay for as little as £5 to £10. The movement should be running beforehand.

Actually I don't think that's so easy to find these cheap as you say. If you want to show things to other member feel free to post links, that is absolutely allowed by forum rules as long isn't your sale. 

Incidentally the OP here, like many others, like Seiko. From what Darak posted so far I'd say that he's finding his way pretty good. 



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just arrived today with the case a little worse for wear so will probably just polish it back to the steel
    • I must be going nuts !! I checked the parts list to get a part number and see that there is no screw shown. Only a rotor assembly. I checked the rotor I removed and the screw is part of the assembly. What a stupid error Regards to all, Dave
    • This would have been seen before the fork and balance were even fitted if you carried out a test on the train wheel as a matter of course.  
    • With the amphibia there's also the gasket in the screw-in crown. If memory serves a correct seal for the back of the case is tricky to find as well, but maybe that's because mine are vintage. The newer cases are larger I think. 
    • As others have pointed out we discussed this subject in great lengths multiple times on multiple discussion groups. Then we have a subject that has too many variables and generalizations that make all the different things seem like one common removing staffs when it's not. There are variety of balance wheels specifically designed to be hard enough to withstand knocking or pushing a staff out. Rolex has one that the only way the staff is coming out is by pushing it out enough pressure is applied the river breaks with a very satisfying pop. This is because they hairspring cannot be removed until the staff is pushed out through. Then of course Rolex has a nice set of tools just for this purpose. A variety watch companies like Elgin made a balance wheels specifically designed to be hard enough to withstand knocking the staff have. For instance that principle is applied with jeweling tool you mention and here's the complete article down below that explains the procedure. Then of course there are variety watch companies Elgin And Hamilton that specifically designed balance staffs designed to be knocked out because the riveting shoulder is supposed to break. That of course would be the original staffs and probably the aftermarket do not have such features.   One of the problems with all of these tools would be the balance staff itself and of course whatever the balance wheel is made of. Personally I like the rule of if you're knocking the staff out and you gently tap with the hammer and it doesn't just pop out then you do not drive it out you do have to use a lathe. Because for variety of reasons staffs that are perhaps over riveted not quite the right size soft balance arms etc. driving a staff out that doesn't really want to come out it's not your best interest to do that.   A variety of American companies used friction fit staffs. For instance here's an example of Waltham Here's something interesting from Hamilton a specific type of 992 with a specific type of hairspring. Normally the Hamilton friction staff's do not have a groove to indicate such. Such as the Hamilton 992B or the Hamilton deck watch but they only have one staff which is friction. This particular staff has been marked because if you read carefully I suspect originally it might not have had a friction staff this was basically an upgrade. I know I've seen in the staffing assortments the blued hubs as a replacement components.    Then I'm attaching a PDF of Hamilton's thoughts on replacing balance staffs. Notice either the hub where the river can be cut away they don't have a preference it's whatever you like. Plus they mention the staff that is designed to break away. Although I have a suspicion you'll probably never see one of those as it would have to be an original staff and I suspect none of the after markets would have that feature. Hamilton technical data number 129 replacement of broken balance staffs.pdf
×
×
  • Create New...