Jump to content

Bulova 6CF Movement


Recommended Posts

The 6CF I have will work as long as pressure is applied to the stem, as in winding pressure - it need not actually be turned.

The pallet fork moves fine and the balance wheel is fine when it is replaced without the pallet fork being in place.

The watch wants to work. I just don't know where the problem lies but there is some friction somewhere.

Maybe the mainspring is shot.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The watch has been cleaned, lubricated and winds fully. The mainspring might just be very weak. 

It's a bit of a mystery why it doesn't run. The impulse jewel is between the banking pins and the regulating mechanism doesn't seem to be the problem.

Either there is too much friction somewhere - I have no idea where - or the mainspring just isn't strong enough to keep it running.

I find it strange that it runs when I keep winding pressure on the mainspring.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My guess would be friction on the barrel arbor pivots or a weak mainspring. I know the symptoms you mention, I have an HMT that exhibited those and winding fully would get the balance moving lethargically briefly then stop. Then holding winding tension got it swinging and it eventually continued but the amplitude is low. That will get stripped, cleaned and checked at some point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's about 99.99% not a mainspring issue. It should limp along with a 5x weaker spring- poorly but running. Is the train free with the balance and fork out? Like two clicks of wind, train should run and escape wheel should turn backwards at least a little at the end. With just a few clicks of wind the fork should snap back and forth cleanly. With fork out and balance in, balance should oscillate freely and for quite some seconds with a swift twist of the movement. If these things aren't happening then start checking methodically.

Going back to the barrel- it could be an issue: when you assemble it you should hold the assembled barrel between stout tweezers on the ends of the arbor and check for endshake. Make sure the cap is fully seated. Make sure the holes in the plate aren't too worn (often an issue with seiko). But even if all that was wonky it should 'run', at least poorly, with a couple of turns of wind.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It can be very difficult to observe the effects of wear in the barrel arbor bushes. This can cause the barrel to cant over and significantly increase the friction in driving the next wheel in the train.  This will not happen without tension in the spring, but you can see how much play there is when the spring is unwound.  Wear could be in the barrel or the movement plate/barrel bridge.  In the latter case you sometimes have to look at the plates from the inside as the wear can be below the edge of the oil sink.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, yankeedog said:

Agreed.with the balance and pallet assembly removed the watch should spin.even with a weak mainspring.

It does. I've removed the balance and the pallet fork and it spins with no problem with only one turn of the crown.

The pallet moves back and forth and the balance is free. I'll check the barrel for wear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Folkvisor said:

It does. I've removed the balance and the pallet fork and it spins with no problem with only one turn of the crown.

The pallet moves back and forth and the balance is free. I'll check the barrel for wear.

One turn of the crown or one click of the ratchet wheel? It should spin the gear train with one or two clicks. With a few clicks the fork should snap back and forth with a little nudge.

But imagining one turn of the crown turns the train the watch should still run. If it's even just close to being in beat, the balance is free, the fork is working correctly*, and the train is free, the watch really should run with just a bit of winding.

Check with balance and fork in, power down, see that the balance swings freely while engaging the fork. It may stutter a bit as the fork knocks into the escape wheel, that's normal.

 

*Perhaps the escapement is grossly out of adjustment but still "snaps" when manually advanced.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you both for your input.

I will check the hairspring again. It was messed up and I had to untangle it but it was flat, evenly spaced and centred on the balance cock before I put it back on the balance staff. I'll check it again but i really hope it's OK. Working on it under a microscope with fine tweezers isn't my favourite thing to do. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, yankeedog said:

Brain surgery is probably easier.

Funny you should say that. I was on a watch factory tour and one of the companies held a master class in watchmaking for us. The guy next to me had been a brain surgeon and he was losing screws left and right. He turned to me and said, “I’m sure glad my former patients aren’t watching me do this.

 I’m not at home just now so I’ll let you know what happens.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The epilame under the oil will also be removed 
    • If we use the rub-off epilame method of pallet stones (run dry for a few minutes before applying the epilame) where will the oil go/be transported when it is pushed away from the impulse surface by the escape wheel teeth? Onto the epilame-treated sections of the pallet! Once the oil has been applied/transported to the epilame-treated sections of the pallet where will it then go? Nowhere as the oil will remain on the epilame. So, perhaps the run-dry method defeats its intended purpose leaving the pallet impulse surfaces dry!? If, on the other hand, we do not remove the epilame from the pallet stones where the escape wheel teeth come in contact with them I'd expect more oil to remain where we want it and need it. Yes, I agree, that is the question, and my gut feeling tells me that is exactly the case. Epilame was created to have an adhesive trait and the oleophobic property is just a side effect.  
    • Might that be the viscous nature of oil resisting gravity H  ,  we have been comparing water and hydrophobic surfaces which are similar in principle but water is much less viscous than oil. I guess what we trying to discover is if epilame also has an adhesive trait as well as being oleophobic. Plus the oil dropet has very little mass for gravity to work on, like watching tiny water beads that can grip onto vertical glass until they are connected together to increase their mass then run down. Gravity isn't the only factor at play when oil is placed on pallet stones. The oil receives a lot of bashing that may push it out of position ? Thinking about it if the oil stays in position for 10 minutes enough time for the escape wheel to scrape off the epilame , then  a walled in lubrication has been achieved,  the epilame is no longer beneath the oil ( possibly mixed into the oil )
    • But it also makes it seem less susceptible to gravity. If you place a droplet of oil on an epilame-treated surface the droplet of oil will still stay in place even if you then flip the surface from a horizontal to a vertical position. That is, the oil droplet remains anchored, and that's the purpose of epilame. If it was just a matter of creating an oleophobic surface we could probably use other, less expensive, methods!? I don't know @Waggy but my gut feeling tells me you're spot on (pun intended!). I believe the oleophobic property is a side effect of epilame which is designed to keep the oil anchored.
    • Saturday morning 27/4 Sunday evening 28/4 Monday evening 29/4 Floor has a drain in the middle so I am hoping that there is very little fall on it, if any. Room is about 2.5 x 2.5 metres square. Can only use about 1/2 of one wall on the right of the pictures which has a sliding glass door in it. And only about 3/4 of the wall to the left of the pictures as it has the door to the house in it. Progress. 🙂 
×
×
  • Create New...