Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello all. I have recently cleaned and serviced an AS2390 movement, which initially after lubricating/ reassembling would begin to tick with just a turn or so of the winding stem. However, a week on and the movement has developed a problem. If the movement is not wound daily and mainspring is allowed to completely de-power, then during winding the watch will not begin tick without a slight ‘swing’ to assist it. In fact it is possible to wind the mainspring to maximum and the watch will only start to tick if a slight swing is applied. Thereafter the watch keeps good time and does not ever seem to stop until the spring completely de-powers again.
 
I am curious as to what is causing this, since initially the watch would start ticking with one or so winds of the crown. Your thoughts and help would be much appreciated please.
 
Kind regards
 
 
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

Check if impulse jewel is in beat.

Release barrel power at the ratchet click, then check the ballance, it should come to stop/ rest where impulse is inside the fork horns. 

How to test , the impulse is in beat if the slight clock/anticlock move of ballance wheel causes the fork move.

 

  • Like 1
Posted

As was mentioned above, it sounds like the watch slipped out of beat. Perhaps this is because the hairspring collet fits too loosely on the staff?  It's always nice to have a watch in beat so that it takes off when you wind it, without having to give it a twist. Good luck.

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted

Thank you all for your invaluable input. I will check the approximate beat this evening by putting the balance assembly onto a spare main plate and checking to see that balance comes to rest with the jewel at mid span between the banking pins. I know this will be mk1 calibrated eyeball only, but should give me a reasonable indication as to how well in beat the watch is or isn’t.

One other factor has crossed my mind.. I think this may have started after I applied lubrication to the pallet stones. Might I have overlubed and caused too much viscous drag for self startup? I used moebius 8000 and none on the pallet pivot

Kind regards


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

Hi Deggsie  you may have hit the nail on the head, To be sure powerdown the watch remove balance and fork. Re-fit balance only and check where the imnpulse jewel rests  should be dead centre of the banking pins if not all the advise given applies  cheers

Posted

Many thanks watchweasol. Still at my workplace just now so can’t check but promise to feedback my findings to you all. Cheers Deggsie

 

Ps. Is moebius 8000 ok on the pallet stones? What is the best method to apply it? Thanks

Posted
16 minutes ago, Deggsie said:

Thank you all for your invaluable input. I will check the approximate beat this evening by putting the balance assembly onto a spare main plate and checking to see that balance comes to rest with the jewel at mid span between the banking pins. I know this will be mk1 calibrated eyeball only, but should give me a reasonable indication as to how well in beat the watch is or isn’t.

One other factor has crossed my mind.. I think this may have started after I applied lubrication to the pallet stones. Might I have overlubed and caused too much viscous drag for self startup? I used moebius 8000 and none on the pallet pivot

Kind regards


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatal

Very modest of you, you service Rolex so I think you know all this, some fresh oil have surely got on escapewheel teeth from overlubed pallets, so if you just rinse the fork in your lighter fluid, some of that fresh oil deposited on the wheel will get back on pallets as the fork gets reinstalled. 

Surely you know the impulse jewel is in the right position to receive energy when in beat, that dosn,t ,however,  mean energy made available there to be received is neccessarily at max, the fork will get energized at pallet end  by escapewheel, so if pallets get dispositioned during cleaning, trouble, real trouble, I am very experienced with loosing pallets as I tried to adjust them.:lol:

 

Posted
Very modest of you, you service Rolex so I think you know all this, some fresh oil have surely got on escapewheel teeth from overlubed pallets, so if you just rinse the fork in your lighter fluid, some of that fresh oil deposited on the wheel will get back on pallets as the fork gets reinstalled. 
Surely you know the impulse jewel is in the right position to receive energy when in beat, that dosn,t ,however,  mean energy made available there to be received is neccessarily at max, the fork will get energized at pallet end  by escapewheel, so if pallets get dispositioned during cleaning, trouble, real trouble, I am very experienced with loosing pallets as I tried to adjust them.:lol:
 

Hello Nucejoe. Sorry you mistake me for an expert Horologist as I do not service Rolex (perhaps in the future if I keep practicing). I appreciate your contribution though [emoji846]

What I will add is that I have now taken out the pallet fork and escape wheel, cleaned in naphtha, rinsed in ipa and reassembled. The balance now energises after a few turns on the crown. So, luckily I think the pallet stones are still correctly located.

Regards


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
3 hours ago, Deggsie said:


Hello Nucejoe. Sorry you mistake me for an expert Horologist as I do not service Rolex (perhaps in the future if I keep practicing). I appreciate your contribution though emoji846.png

What I will add is that I have now taken out the pallet fork and escape wheel, cleaned in naphtha, rinsed in ipa and reassembled. The balance now energises after a few turns on the crown. So, luckily I think the pallet stones are still correctly located.

Regards


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Hi, Glad to hear this,  excessive lube was your own diagosis too,  the solutions you used are new names to me, I search online to read about them. Thanks for sharring.

Oh my friend here :geek:  celebrates success.  Best wishes joe

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yes, the specific old tools do exist, but may be having one is not needed as they are not cheap, and also You will be able to do without it well enough. My advice will be to use regular depthing tool and adjust it for the exact distance between pallet fork and escape wheel bearings from the watch. Then remove the shellac from the pallet that now doesn't pass the ew teeth and move this pallet in. Then put the pallet fork and ew on the depthing tool and check how they lock. They should not lock when the pallet is in, but You will little by little move the pallet out and locking will appear. Then move just an idea out for reliable work and apply shellac, then check if things are still the same. You have to observe where the teeth fall on the pallets - it must be just a little below the edge between impulse and rest planes. Then You must check how everything behaves in the movement This Potence tool is so ingenious, but actually, the traditional way to do the things is much more simple. Arrange the parts not on the pillar plate, but on the cover plate. Only the central wheel will remain on the pillar plate, secured by the cannon pinion.
    • There is a tool that was made for setting up and adjusting escapements of full plate watches.  There were two styles, the picture below shows both of them.  The lower tool held a movement plate and the vertical pointed rods were adjusted to hold the unsupported pivots of the lever and escape wheel.  There was also a version of this tool that had 3 adjustable safety centres so that the balance pivot could be supported by the tool :  The other version I’m aware of is the Boynton’s Escapement Matching and Examining Tool came as a set of two or three clamps that gripped the watch plate and held the safety centres for the pivots : These do turn up on eBay from time to time.  For some escapement work, you can set up the parts in a regular depthing tool, with the centres set according to the distance between the corresponding pivot holes on the movement.  I hope this helps, Mark
    • Once you are aware of the problem, you can adjust as necessary. I have a couple of the Omega 10xx, and they are not my favourites. They seem a bit flimsy and not as solid as previous generation Omega. But I think that's true of a lot of movements from the 70-80s. For me, the 50-60s is the peak in watch movements, where the design criteria was quality, not saving the last penny.
    • Thanks for this post MikePilk, I just came across a similar problem with an Omega 1022.  The problem I had was the seconds pinion spring was bent out of shape and did not even engage with the wheel properly, so the seconds hand was not moving at all. (no power loss though :) I removed the automatic module so I could access the spring and work on it. Once I bent it back close to the right shape, I experienced the same problem you reported about power loss.  Many tweaks later, and the seconds hand is moving properly again, with amplitude back to good numbers again. Cheers
×
×
  • Create New...