Jump to content

Is this the wrong spring??


Lc130

Recommended Posts

Hi All

I'm a beginner.  I got the spring shown below from Otto Frei in the US.  It's for an AS 1700.  The supplier looked up the part number from the movement number.  When I look it up at J  Borel I get the same part that Otto Frei sent.

The problem is that while the spring certainly appears fully into the barrel, the lid wont close.  I've tried several times.

Any thoughts?

Thank you

Charlie

 

IMG_3380.JPG

IMG_3381.JPG

IMG_3382.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi  Chek that the outer coil is below the rim where the barrel lid fits on if so it may be just a tight fit, some can be a bit of a pest and need some pressure but don't distort the barrel or the lid or you will get binding problems.  If the spring is higher than the rim its wrong. Use a micrometer and measure the old spring for height.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Charlie,

as you suspected, it's the wrong spring. As suggested above, I checked the Ranfft site (a bit tricky to navigate from the homepage - click the "pink pages" button, then "archive", then in the category list "Archive: Watch Movements", then search for AS 1700. The mainspring is listed as Zf675, 1.20 x 9.5 x 0.10 x 315mm. You appear to have been sold a 3mm deep spring instead of 1.2mm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Klassiker said:

Hi Charlie,

as you suspected, it's the wrong spring. As suggested above, I checked the Ranfft site (a bit tricky to navigate from the homepage - click the "pink pages" button, then "archive", then in the category list "Archive: Watch Movements", then search for AS 1700. The mainspring is listed as Zf675, 1.20 x 9.5 x 0.10 x 315mm. You appear to have been sold a 3mm deep spring instead of 1.2mm.

Yup!  The new one measures 1.5 high.  The old 1.2.  Am I misreading the package label (beginner here)? It reads 3mm high, 0.105mm thick.  Is the last number the barrel diameter which I measure at 10mm.  

Interestingly, the same incorrect part comes up at J Borel.  How common is it that supply houses get it wrong?  As a follow up, where do they parts for no longer made watches?

It appears that the correct measurement is listed here https://watchguy.co.uk/cgi-bin/mainsprings

Thank you

Edited by Lc130
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The spring in your photos measures 1.5mm high, not 3mm? I was reading the label on the packaging different to you. 3mm high, diameter 10.5mm and 13cm (or 130mm) long. Which thinking about it is far too low to be the length. And no information about the strip thickness is also unlikely. I am baffled, to be honest.

Oh, wait! I just put the code number into Google and ended up at the same place quoted by rogart63, on the Cas-Kerr website. The dimensions are not mm but inches! Still don't make complete sense to me, but the 13 is probably the length in inches.

As you can see from the discrepancy between watchguy uk (great blog and source of info for us beginners by the way) and Ranfft, the exact spring dimensions are not critical. Obviously it needs to fit in the barrel, and being too powerful (too thick, too wide) can also cause problems. There should be springs available on the market which will do the job, even if one of these two isn't available.

There is an Ebay seller in Mannheim currently selling an NOS barrel complete for EUR 16.90, but maybe not posting to the US.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe the part label is measured in Dennison.  The conversion formula is here https://mb.nawcc.org/threads/metric-to-dennison-conversion-formulas.54587/

After reviewing several sites it appears

1.2mm = 3 dennison

0.105mm height = 10.5

300mm length = 13

http://www.gruenwristwatches.com/gruen-mainspring-sizes-in-dennison.php

http://watchinprogress.com/mainspring-size-dennison-to-metric-conversion/

https://www.jewelerssupplies.com/media/pdfs/MainspringsCatalog2018.pdf

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Lc130 said:

I believe the part label is measured in Dennison.  The conversion formula is here https://mb.nawcc.org/threads/metric-to-dennison-conversion-formulas.54587/

After reviewing several sites it appears

1.2mm = 3 dennison

0.105mm height = 10.5

300mm length = 13

http://www.gruenwristwatches.com/gruen-mainspring-sizes-in-dennison.php

http://watchinprogress.com/mainspring-size-dennison-to-metric-conversion/

https://www.jewelerssupplies.com/media/pdfs/MainspringsCatalog2018.pdf

 

Seriously? Dennison? That's even more arcane than the Lancaster measurement which American pocket watches use to denote size. It's based on 1/30 inch. Arrrggh! Just when I thought some of the fog might be dissipating. I wonder how Liberia and Myanmar, the only other two countries currently using the imperial system of measurement, contend with this?

Edited by TexasDon
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is just bonkers! No wonder they sent you the wrong size.

Well done for working it out. I checked Wikipedia, trying to understand the thinking behind this. Although it's not described directly, I guess it's something to do with the "American system of watch manufacturing".

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I suppose it would depend upon what your lubricating with those? for instance what does the manufacturer say about those lubricants? I have a PDF from the manufacture and a rather peculiar statement found on the bottom of the chart. my suspicion is the reason the recommending would be without epilam the HP oils like the spread except when they're in Ruby jewel's with steel pivots. tableEN lubrication 2020.pdf
    • These types of hairsprings become weak with age and very fragile. Which I expect it is that giving you trouble, and that wheel is not the correct one, if it were not bent I don't think the movement would run as the teeth are not the correct height. The problem you have is price which depends on you. It can be repaired but is it worth it to you, because there is little value in the clock. A wheel can be made and hairspring replaced. Or hang on to it and keep looking on ebay which is your best bet for replacement parts or even a complete movement but it will be like finding a needle in a haystack. 
    • I did that also for a few movements - well, mainly in/around the train jewels. I made big efforts to epilame the mainplate WITHOUT getting Epilame into the Pallet fork jewels (where it's not supposed to be, right?). I made litte barriers with Rodico around that jewel and used drops from a syringe to apply on the rest.  However, I've now stopped doing this. For three reasons: 1. It's a hassle and consumes more of this liquid gold. 2. I didn't see the need when using HP1000/HP1300 lubricants and grease for most part. The two places where I'd use 9010 (i.e. escape wheel and balance) receive Epilame in specific places... or the cap-jewel-setting of the balance suspends the oil sufficiently be capillary action (see my "conflict" about using Epilame on the balance jewels).  3. Lastly, and here I really wonder about yours and others' experiences: I felt that applying Epliame to the train jewels left them looking hazy (borderline dirty) compared to the (painstakingly achieved) sparkly clean results of my cleaning process. I just can't help but think that the Epilame residuals would mix with the oil and cause more friction/wear. I don't know.    simple: it'll stay there. It won't move any further. That's exactly what is happening if you epilame a cap stone. You end up placing the 9010 right on top of the epilame and the oil will sit nicely on that spot.
    • There are some parts on Ebay for the seiko 6020A, it may just be a waiting game for someone to strip one down, NOS will be more scarce . K would strip your movement down to the module then start looking at other seiko movement to see if that coil is used, then seek out a seiko part dealer. Also Retrowatches youtube owner Mike may give you some advice try him on his site . He also hangs around amateur watchmaking groups.
    • I would agree, in order to work harden something you need to exceed it's yield strength when it moves from the elastic zone to the plastic zone and you get permanent deformation and work hardening which is fairly close to its failure point, relatively speaking and dependent on the material/alloy of course. In theory you can load something constantly within its elastic range and not suffer work hardening issues.
×
×
  • Create New...