Jump to content

Seiko amplitude - is my timegrapher wrong ?


mikepilk

Recommended Posts

I've been struggling to get this Seiko 7002A to show an amplitude of greater than about 230 deg on my Weishi 1000 Timegrapher (52 deg lift angle).

But to my eye it looks more, maybe 270-290 deg.

I've been trying to capture it using pics/video/strobe but with no success.

 When stationary, the arm on the balance sits at about the position of the '0' in the lower left. 

Is it reversing direction somewhere near the stud ?

With no adjustable gain on this model, could it be using the wrong signal ?

Any ideas ?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seikos don't generally achieve a great amplitude, which I guess you probably already know.

Looking at your video, you really need to see it in slo-mo. However, I can see two main static points which are fairly close to each other which suggests the amplitude possibly isn't that far from 180 degrees.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, mikepilk said:

I've been struggling to get this Seiko 7002A to show an amplitude of greater than about 230 deg on my Weishi 1000 Timegrapher (52 deg lift angle).

But to my eye it looks more, maybe 270-290 deg.

I've been trying to capture it using pics/video/strobe but with no success.

 When stationary, the arm on the balance sits at about the position of the '0' in the lower left. 

Is it reversing direction somewhere near the stud ?

With no adjustable gain on this model, could it be using the wrong signal ?

Any ideas ?

 

I have made this comment many times, for some reason vintage seiko's have low amplitude. Providing it is about 200 + then it will run just fine. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been struggling to get this Seiko 7002A to show an amplitude of greater than about 230 deg on my Weishi 1000 Timegrapher (52 deg lift angle).
But to my eye it looks more, maybe 270-290 deg.
I've been trying to capture it using pics/video/strobe but with no success.
 When stationary, the arm on the balance sits at about the position of the '0' in the lower left. 
Is it reversing direction somewhere near the stud ?
With no adjustable gain on this model, could it be using the wrong signal ?
Any ideas ?
 

Use an iPhone in slow motion and take the video. Mark the balance lightly with a sharpy in red and then measure the swing, then divide the result by 2 for the amplitude.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hell0 @nevenbekriev. Thank you for your advice. I have removed the old setting using my staking set--I will keep the KIF spring, since it is still good.  I am awaiting the replacement setting, and will update when I do that. In the mean time, I looked at the escape wheel and it looks ok. What do you think?    
    • Aloha All, I recently bought this Seitz tool on eBay, but it is missing some pushers reamers.  I ended up ordering new parts for those that were missing before I received the actual Seitz tool (bad idea).   Upon inspecting the pushers/bits, I noticed 23 of the 56 provided with the set had no numbers. Further inspection revealed a huge difference in the quality of those unnumbered.  Do all Seitz pushers/bits have a number on them?  I'm pretty sure that 33 of the 56 I received are cheap Chinese knockoffs.  The worst part is that I ordered $80 of parts to replace the missing pushers/bits, and now I'm looking to return the tool. I'm not crazy, right? If these are Seitz parts, they should all be numbered, correct? The first two pictures are the Seitz (numbered), and the other pictures are the suspect parts.  Will I even be able to get a refund?  Thanks, Frank     
    • It was £10 + min fee, total £16, could not leave it there. Its a Stanton A.D.2. http://stanton-instruments.co.uk/
    • Chief- The picture below shows the three parts from the dial side that are most useful to "fingerprint" a movement in conjunction with the diameter of the movement.  That's why forum participants are always asking for dial side photos in posts asking for identification.  As far as the setting lever screw, it actually sits loose in the main plate. The threads engage the setting lever below, and the elongated stem above the shoulder sticks through a hole in one of the bridge plates so that it's held captive if unscrewed all the way.  So you may be fine as far as that goes. 
    • So I found what I believe is the setting lever screw! Am I right in thinking the screw next to the click is the correct one for the setting lever? However if it is, it doesn't fit in the hole which I believe is for it! I can get the lever to sit nicely on the stem and line up with a hole, but the screw only goes as far as the shoulder and stops. It's as though the hole is too small! The dial side has been disassembled by the way, the other wheels are in my tray
×
×
  • Create New...