Jump to content

A Gamble ...... will they ever be fashionable again?


Endeavor

Recommended Posts

I took a gamble and bought these 3x N.O.S., 1940 -'50's ladies watches. They are made by "Laco", a German watch factory who, one of the very view in the WW2, was awarded to make aviation watches. Those Laco aviation watches became later very sought-after & very expensive.

Looking at the pictures, after 70 year in the drawer, their quality & condition doesn't look too bad. Two movements are with 16-jewels, one seemingly without. Paid £32 including postage, so a bit more than a "tenner" each. Perhaps there are still some ladies/girls out there who likes to wear them, or as a dress-watch ......??

I do hope so because I think they deserve finally some wrist time............ if I'll get them to work, that is ..... :huh:

Laco-1.thumb.jpg.ac13934561d1b16a31c00b9878a428e8.jpgLaco-3.thumb.jpg.5f78e6a12a8de1a17858d5ff32566d12.jpgLaco-2.thumb.jpg.6e5eb4713c24531dda1f15f9c9706c36.jpgLaco-5.thumb.jpg.babd07f991d9ff8b2ce7458f42644347.jpgLaco-4.thumb.jpg.7597413393b875461b52de3d63e95f2c.jpgLaco-7.thumb.jpg.46a53f5a98888fecf1da7c19f8058c22.jpgLaco-6.thumb.jpg.7a353e5257a227841b860b54965cfc85.jpgLaco-8.thumb.jpg.c330aa8bb2f6d0c05755dfe056561726.jpg

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Tmuir: I'm not into these little movements (jet), but since these do have a Swiss lever escapement, 16 jewels, look solid & nicely build, I thought the quality is okay. Laco is a German company and normally the Germans don't produce crap. I don't think they came cheap, or that they were at the bottom of the range in the '40's - 50's.

I'm trying to find some more information about Laco's reputation and (build) quality, not that long after the war. It seems that they did well during the war with their aviation watches .....

Edited by Endeavor
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Right now I'm making do with a similar micrometer (the one below is $45 shipped but you can find better deals) and a $20 stand. You do have to be excruciatingly careful measuring jewels, since there's no table, but if you don't have the $500 to throw around, it's a nice option.
    • As  I kid, I'd watch Godzilla stomping over buildings and cars and I'd think to myself: Tokyo is a really dangerous place to live... . Cool watch!!
    • Next one up an AS 554, looks like a bit more to this one. First job is to check thickness, most springs are somewhere between .3 and .4, this one measures .35, that matches in with the .4 spring steel i ordered. So for marking up a permanent marker comes in handy to colour up the steel to be marked later with a scriber once its dry. Bestfit provide the extra bit of info for the jumper spring that is missing.
    • Thanks again, Marc.  Super helpful. I was wondering what the hole was for, and now it makes perfect sense. With your help and the other members here, it looks like I'm good to go with my Seitz tool set. I had to order some replacement pushers, but with those, the set is complete and in good condition. Now, I need to figure out what tool to buy to measure jewels (amongst other watch-related parts). I had my eye on the JKA Feintaster micrometers, but people get crazy bidding on them for $400-600 USD. I was thinking of just a regular digital micrometer (Mitutoyo). Thoughts?  Mahalo. Frank      
    • Yep, that's exactly how it should fit. The reamer shank is tapered and the socket in the spindle is also tapered so that the one centers in the other and is gripped tightly. If there is any wobble when the reamer is seated as far it will go then there is a problem. The cross hole in the spindle is to allow you the push the reamer back out again. If the reamer seated much deeper then it would limit the access for pushing it back out again. Here is one of mine for comparison.
×
×
  • Create New...