Jump to content

Advice on locating replacement Jewel for v61

Recommended Posts

Hi there, am new to forum.

Am smitten by these beautiful machines - my first mech was a lovely unusual Rotherham, my second I purchased just on looks for next to nothing only to find out it is a mostly intact repeater minus gong. The rest is history. 

Within an hour of getting a lovely c1930 Heuer chrono pocket watch ref.701 with a v61 movement, that had survived 90 odd years just fine; I showed it to a friend who tried to turn it over with the back open and fumbled it.

It only works now when looking at the movement, my untrained ear and diagnosis is that the Upper balance jewel is cracked.

My question is simply around finding the correct jewel to replace this; is this an off the shelf jewel that can be replaced, can I find a balance bridge complete? Or does something have to be custom made? 

On another unrelated quick note I dont suppose anyone could tell me if I can use a Landeron 48 balance wheel and bride in a 248 movement?

I am a complete watch novice but am very technically minded, a fast learner, and am also able to pull back and call for help if things are going pear shaped.

Would like to attempt this myself and have bought something jewel setting tools am just minus a press currently.  Will reach out but locally the knowledge is slim I live in top of the South Island in New Zealand- Nelson. Small place.

Thanks for looking






Link to comment
Share on other sites

How did you come to the conclusion the upper balance jewel is cracked? And which one, the hole jewel or cap jewel? From the pic the cap jewel looks ok but pretty fuzzy. It would be odd to break a jewel from accidentally touching the movement (is that what happened or did it drop?).


At any rate I'm not sure if this piece has rubbed in or friction jewels. The former are tricky, the latter fairly simple to change.


Given the regulator is moved way over toward "-" my guess is it shifted during the fumble, and was a bit tight on the hairspring, and your hairspring is a little tweeked now. Try moving it to the center of the balance cock and see what happens.



Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to Jules Borel, there are 3 different balances you could have in a Landeron 248, but they also all appeared in Landeron 48s, so if you have the same jewel type in both I'm sure they would be interchangeable. http://cgi.julesborel.com/cgi-bin/matcgi2?ref=LAN_248

Always best to keep different questions in different threads, so if you want to go further with this, please start a new one

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi guys thanks for the replies, 

Oldhippy I'm very new to this, what an incredible trade and I am constantly amazed by the workmanship from so long ago, the prices the high end movements fetch and conversely the low prices i have been paying for movements that someone long ago spent a great deal of time on.

Am an electrician and a father with many interests; film photography, stargazing, light engineering and racing rally cars, among other eclectic interests. 

NickelSilver it was dropped unfortunately. The movement had stopped and lazily started again when prompted gently. Must have fallen on the movement side with face up - i do not know for sure about this just a guess based on no play but a slightly irregular sound, what looks to me like reduced amplitude, no play but balance wheel stops when watch is inverted to look at face. From what I can see it is a rub-in job.


StuartBaker104 thanks for info and yes I will investigate this further and ask a new question on appropriate section. I bought a nice 248 with a missing balance wheel for an attractive price. Am guessing it'll be more involved than what I anticipate but at the end of the day these movements are so aesthetically pleasing to me I am not super fussed. Am just preparing for my foray into actually working on them so have a long way to go. Have got some jewel setting tools, but still need to locate a jewel press.

Thanks again all

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Don't give up. You just need patience and practice. Don't use force or try to screw down the plate before making sure everything is in place. My first few watches took me like 45 minutes to get the train wheels in. Now it usually takes me less than a minute. Make sure that all the bottom pivots are in their respective holes before putting on the top plate. Then apply gentle pressure with a pegwood or gloved finger. Start from the barrel, 2nd wheel, 3rd wheel.... and finally the escape wheel. You can feel the plate drop each time you get a pivot in. If you experience the pivots that you have already gotten in coming out of their holes when you work on other wheels down line, you can put 1 or 2 screws nearer the barrel side in but don't exert any force on the screws. Just lightly turn the screws until you feel pressure and backoff 1/4 turn. This will prevent the plates from separating.  I use a homemade tool with a brass wire, shaped like an oiler to lightly touch the wheels to guide them into place. I find that an oiler made of hardened steel can leave scratches on the brass wheels. Once you think you have gotten all the pivots in, test it by using a blower to blow on the escape wheel. It should spin freely. Continue applying pressure on the top plate with the pegwood or finger until you lightly tighten all the screws. Don't tighten fully yet until you reconfirm that the wheels are able to spin freely. And reconfirm again after you have fully tightened all the screws. What you are experiencing is normal. All of us have gone through it. Don't work on watches when you are tired or frustrated. All of us can tell you what that leads to. But I'm sure you'll experience a few hard lessons even after reading this advice. It's only human. Go forth and practice. Good luck!
    • by the way this is very confusing to me? You have a 7s26a and you're comparing it to a 7s26b which is confusing to me because they're not the same? Watch companies are rather amusing when it comes the part numbers seemingly watches with similar  numbers as you're implying should be exactly identical but in this case they are very very dramatically different for instance the 7s26a balance part number is 0310 020 the 7s26b has a different part number 0310 197 as the part numbers are entirely different there must be a reason it noticed that I made two terms in the quote above in bold regulator pins are versus the etachron  system. In addition to changing the regulation part more than likely they change the hairspring. So this would typically main you wouldn't build a swap balance completes from one type to the other because they will be entirely different. this is where looking at the technical guide might yield some amusing information. you'll note in the 7s26b  service guide it explains what the difference is. It makes a reference to the balance staff which is totally inconsequential for this discussion. But the really big difference is the A  version has conventional regulator pins and the B  has is the Etachron  system. In @Jon excellent images up above he didn't explain something? if you look carefully at the images below you'll notice that the outer terminal curve is different  as a guest to accommodate the etachron  system it looks like the terminal curve is farther out. So yes exactly as the parts list indicates the balance completes will look different because they are different. Because they are different there are not interchangeable. so basically because the letter changes at the end in this particular case we end up with two separate balance completes as proven by the parts numbers. Balance completes that are entirely different to accommodate the regulation system conceivably with entirely different characteristics of timing as they are entirely different. So your observation of the balances are different shape is correct they are different.      
    • See, the problem with widening to a little bit wider diam is that the bit will 'grab' too much at a time and will get in too fast by itself, then it will stuck and break imediatey. If enlargening from 0.3 to 0.5 needed, complitelly different drill bit must be made - it must be similar to the ones they use for weapon cannons, with one cutting edge and with angle that will not cut fast. The other option is to enlarge the hole like they do on big lathes with cutter for internal turning, that will be small enough to get in the hole The idea with the plugging could work, but I haven't try it. The pug should be only a little bit softer than the piece and must get in completelly to the botom of the hole.  
    • Thanks for all the comments. I think I'll go back to restoring BMW motorcycles and making model steam engines.  Dave
    • Yep my thoughts the same,  i realised i slipped up with the smaller drill half way through. Out of curiosity if you had to widen a hole, could it be plugged and re- drilled ? 
  • Create New...