Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm about to start work on the following clock Its a two train full Westminster strike clock I'm unsure of the origins of this clock but would presume that it is French although the seller suggested it was made by Mauthe and of German origin but I have never seen a movement like it before. The striking train is controlled by a differential gear which locks out the chime train once it has finished its sequence on the hour thus allowing it to strike the hours.

The differential gearing used in this clock was patented by Gillett and Johnston in 1923 and used by them in both weight driven clocks and Fusee clocks it was also used by Elliott in spring driven platform and pendulum clocks but I don't think this movement is of English origin.

unknow5.thumb.JPG.e5905fc0d2b6bde12284b9188c9f4ff2.JPG

 

The differential gear that drives the chime and strike

unknow2.thumb.JPG.7bfa08dc76e40711a8231ca28989d76a.JPGunknow.thumb.JPG.72cc6b753fc69747e3db2006638bc7c9.JPG

 

The mechanism does work extremely well apart from being very dirty, it is a well made quality movement.IMG_2745.thumb.JPG.0c29aee55612f7f62694c022a2f648e1.JPGunknow6.thumb.JPG.79d5aae1cefc727edf60dd30c51ba6b7.JPGunknow3.thumb.JPG.ce43fcc8a03b32976f634ec511c0e5da.JPG

 

There is only a serial number on the clock and a small stamped letter J anyone have a idea about the origins of this movement ?

 

 

Posted

I cannot be 100% because this is a first for me. I am not happy with the finish of the screws and parts of the movement. That is why I do not think it is French. I do not think it is made by Mauthe. There clocks had a mark (see photo) I’m sure it is German as there is a J I wonder if it was made by Junghans.

Mauthe_Trademark_c._1925.png

Posted

Thanks for the reply's yes the screws are not highly polished as you would expect on a French clock , but the suspension Brocot adjustment made me think it was perhaps french in origin, I shall clean it up I have on occasion found makers marks on the inner plate surfaces so I shall see if anything comes up whilst cleaning.

The J could be Junghans but that is usually stamped within a star this is not, the clock was retailed by a English Jeweller, the only other observation is that the Hands are of a style that I have only ever seen used on Winterhalder clocks and I have a 3/4 Westminster two train clock with the exact same hands fitted that clock of course does not do the chimes on the hour but just strikes the hours.

I shall post more pictures as I clean the clock.

Many thanks

Posted
22 hours ago, oldhippy said:

 

I cannot be 100% because this is a first for me. I am not happy with the finish of the screws and parts of the movement. That is why I do not think it is French. I do not think it is made by Mauthe. There clocks had a mark (see photo) I’m sure it is German as there is a J I wonder if it was made by Junghans.

Mauthe_Trademark_c._1925.png

Here it is..what ever it means..

F.M.S. (im Kreis mit Adler)   Friedrich Mauthe GmbH Großuhren; Schwenningen, Deutschland; registriert am 28.1.1925

Len

Posted
23 hours ago, wls1971 said:

I'm about to start work on the following clock Its a two train full Westminster strike clock I'm unsure of the origins of this clock but would presume that it is French although the seller suggested it was made by Mauthe and of German origin but I have never seen a movement like it before. The striking train is controlled by a differential gear which locks out the chime train once it has finished its sequence on the hour thus allowing it to strike the hours.

The differential gearing used in this clock was patented by Gillett and Johnston in 1923 and used by them in both weight driven clocks and Fusee clocks it was also used by Elliott in spring driven platform and pendulum clocks but I don't think this movement is of English origin.

unknow5.thumb.JPG.e5905fc0d2b6bde12284b9188c9f4ff2.JPG

 

The differential gear that drives the chime and strike

unknow2.thumb.JPG.7bfa08dc76e40711a8231ca28989d76a.JPGunknow.thumb.JPG.72cc6b753fc69747e3db2006638bc7c9.JPG

 

The mechanism does work extremely well apart from being very dirty, it is a well made quality movement.IMG_2745.thumb.JPG.0c29aee55612f7f62694c022a2f648e1.JPGunknow6.thumb.JPG.79d5aae1cefc727edf60dd30c51ba6b7.JPGunknow3.thumb.JPG.ce43fcc8a03b32976f634ec511c0e5da.JPG

 

There is only a serial number on the clock and a small stamped letter J anyone have a idea about the origins of this movement ?

 

 

Another beautiful unusual movement, where do you get them from??

Posted
27 minutes ago, Lenj said:

Another beautiful unusual movement, where do you get them from??

It was a Ebay purchase I was drawn to the ingenious solution to getting a full Westminster strike from a two train clock, when its running it works extremely well but like all these two train Westminster clocks it has a huge spring on the strike train.

I have had further correspondence with the seller he states that he thinks it Mauthe because he has had  a similar movement that was stamped Mauthe 

" I`ve had a Mauthe clock before which was stamped, but the movements were very similar. I took it to the British Horological open day and the general opinion was that it was more like a Mauthe than anything else!
Mauthe senior, had a son who registered a business in France post WW1 and I wonder if that might be the answer?"

The differential strike controller was invented by Gillet and Johnston in 1923 and is very similar in design using a differential gear that locks out the chimes when they have completed the sequence on the hour and letting the hour strike run,

https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/cb/23/0f/34b4fc44f86b51/US1468267.pdf

 

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, wls1971 said:

It was a Ebay purchase I was drawn to the ingenious solution to getting a full Westminster strike from a two train clock, when its running it works extremely well but like all these two train Westminster clocks it has a huge spring on the strike train.

I have had further correspondence with the seller he states that he thinks it Mauthe because he has had  a similar movement that was stamped Mauthe 

" I`ve had a Mauthe clock before which was stamped, but the movements were very similar. I took it to the British Horological open day and the general opinion was that it was more like a Mauthe than anything else!
Mauthe senior, had a son who registered a business in France post WW1 and I wonder if that might be the answer?"

The differential strike controller was invented by Gillet and Johnston in 1923 and is very similar in design using a differential gear that locks out the chimes when they have completed the sequence on the hour and letting the hour strike run,

https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/cb/23/0f/34b4fc44f86b51/US1468267.pdf

 

If you look further up the page, I found your clock, and Yes it's Frederick Mauthe. Good find. Date are about right 1925.

 

Len

 

Edited by Lenj
Posted
24 minutes ago, Lenj said:

If you look further up the page, I found your clock, and Yes it's Frederick Mauthe. Good find. Date are about right 1925.

 

Mauthe must have had some kind of agreement to manufacture them because they would have been a clear infringement of Gillett and Johnstons Patent, the system of regulating the strike is almost identical.

Posted

I hope you can record the taking apart of this movement and showing the parts. It would be wonderful if you could record the action of the works.

You never stop learning in horology. I’m seeing and learning something all new to me.  

Posted
1 hour ago, oldhippy said:

 

I hope you can record the taking apart of this movement and showing the parts. It would be wonderful if you could record the action of the works.

You never stop learning in horology. I’m seeing and learning something all new to me.  

Well I should yes its such an unusual and ingenious way of getting a full chime sequence from two springs, i wonder why it never caught on it works so well, I shall have to video the works in action, but work beckons tomorrow so will have to do it next week.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello all, just disassembling to service, but I can’t figure out the working of the calendar work…it’s not operational the jumper and spring are ok, but the operation of the driving wheel has me at a loss. I can’t see a cam to drive anything. Is something damaged or missing? Help please!
    • Believe the relume (not a fan) was done a long time after the damage. 
    • I can only think of some chemical reaction to reluming
    • I have a little milling attachment for my WW lathe, but very rarely use it and not for wheel and pinion cutting. For that I use a small Sixis 101 milling machine. I normally do direct dividing, but sometimes have to do an odd count and use the universal index which also fits on the Sixis.   Back in the day when I didn't have a mill, I would cut gearing on my Schaublin 102. It has a universal dividing attachment which fits the back of the spindle. Both it and the one for the Sixis are 60:1 ratio, and with the set of 4  index plates I can do almost any division. When I've had to do a strange high count prime number, I print a disc with the needed division and just place the plunger on the dot. Any position error is reduced by a factor of 60 so still plenty accurate.   The machines are a mess in the pics as I'm in the process of making a batch of barrels for a wristwatch 🙃.   This is the Sixis. The head can also be placed vertically, as can the dividing spindle.   Dividing plates. The smaller ones fit another dividing spindle.   Universal divider for the Sixis. I put it together with parts from an odd Sixis spindle that takes w20 collets, like the Schaublin 102, and a dividing attachment from a Schaublin mill.     The dividing attachment for the 102. The gear fits in place of the handwheel at the back of the headstock.   And the little milling attachment for the WW lathe. I just set it on the slide rest to illustrate the size, you can see from the dust on it it really doesn't get used much. I think only when I change bearing in the head, to kiss the collet head seat (grinding wheel still in the milling attachment).
    • I read a lot about the quality (or lack thereof) of Seiko's 4R, 6R, 8L  movements...or more specifically the lack of regulation from the factory. Especially when compared to similar priced manufactures using SW200's or ETA's. I thought I'd ask those more in the know, do the 4R's and 6R's deserve their bad reputation, is it fairly easy for someone with minimal skills (or better yet a trained watch mechanic) to dial in these movements to a more acceptable performance.    For background I spent more on a 1861 Speedy years ago, expecting that the advertised 0-15s/d  would probably perform more like 5-7s/d. In reality it's been closed to 2-4s/d. 
×
×
  • Create New...