Jump to content

Oil cups


teegee

Recommended Posts

19 hours ago, m1ks said:

Are those pla? That's A heap of sanding and polishing if so. That's dedication.

I was just thinking about printing some in resin. Hmmm.

Yup, these are PLA.  From my research PLA appears to have really good resistance to solvents (water less so).  It might not be as good as incalite but I can't find any data on that.  Of all the filament types PLA actually looks to be the best bet.  I actually did a test and left some 3in1 oil sitting on the PLA for a week and it didn't soften (yes, this is not an industry recognized test). 

Resin might work, I've not looked up how well it handles solvents. I'm jealous you have that option because it's going to mean way less sanding.  But I don't mind that much, I enjoy making things shiny :).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, vinn3 said:

nothing wrong with glass.   oil might desolve the plastic and set up when in the watch. on the subject of hell; it might be diffacult to service watches by fire light. 

Very true.  Although I might have other things on my mind than servicing a watch in the case of hell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Dpastl said:

Yup, these are PLA.  From my research PLA appears to have really good resistance to solvents (water less so).  It might not be as good as incalite but I can't find any data on that.  Of all the filament types PLA actually looks to be the best bet.  I actually did a test and left some 3in1 oil sitting on the PLA for a week and it didn't soften (yes, this is not an industry recognized test). 

Resin might work, I've not looked up how well it handles solvents. I'm jealous you have that option because it's going to mean way less sanding.  But I don't mind that much, I enjoy making things shiny :).

Nylon filament might be a good option too, as it is pretty resistant to oils.

The layered nature of 3D prints might however cause the oil to wick in to the inter-layer spaces, so rapid flame polishing of the surfaces might be a good option.

Edited by AndyHull
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Dpastl said:

Yup, these are PLA.  From my research PLA appears to have really good resistance to solvents (water less so).  It might not be as good as incalite but I can't find any data on that.  Of all the filament types PLA actually looks to be the best bet.  I actually did a test and left some 3in1 oil sitting on the PLA for a week and it didn't soften (yes, this is not an industry recognized test). 

Resin might work, I've not looked up how well it handles solvents. I'm jealous you have that option because it's going to mean way less sanding.  But I don't mind that much, I enjoy making things shiny :).

Definitely less sanding but I'm not at all sure how it will stand up against oil sitting in it.

I could use pla but having sanded it before I would rather not and can only bow to your incredible patience and resolve to get it that smooth and shiny.

My main concern with the resin is chipping it with the oiler as it's far more brittle than pla, I might try the same 3 in 1 test.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/28/2019 at 10:40 AM, AndyHull said:

Nylon filament might be a good option too, as it is pretty resistant to oils.

The layered nature of 3D prints might however cause the oil to wick in to the inter-layer spaces, so rapid flame polishing of the surfaces might be a good option.

I love that idea, I'd never thought of it.

Although perhaps the slow wicking will force me to use fresh oil each time I service a watch :P.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/28/2019 at 7:09 PM, m1ks said:

Definitely less sanding but I'm not at all sure how it will stand up against oil sitting in it.

I could use pla but having sanded it before I would rather not and can only bow to your incredible patience and resolve to get it that smooth and shiny.

My main concern with the resin is chipping it with the oiler as it's far more brittle than pla, I might try the same 3 in 1 test.

Hope it turns out!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • hmmmm.... maybe there is a way to skin that cat 🙀 let me think on it... unless anyone else has any ideas? I left the opening in the side of the base and ring quite large to maybe allow you to grip the crown, but appreciate this may not always be possible, especially for small movements where the crown will not extend past the outer wall of the holder. I noticed this also, but after using the holder for a while I noticed that the ring/holder began to wear into shape (rough edges/bumps worn off) and the size became closer to the desired movement OD. Maybe with some trial and error we could add 0.5 mm (??) to the movement OD to allow for this initial bedding-in?
    • Hi nickelsilver, thanks for the great explanation and the links! I'll take a good look in the article.  Especially this is great news to hear! Looking through forums and youtube videos I was informed to 'fist find a case and then fit a movement for it'. But seems that's not the case for pocket watches at least?  I guess I should be looking to find some 'male square bench keys' for now. I was thinking of winding the mainspring using a screwdriver directly, but I found a thread that you've replied on, saying that it could damage the spring. 
    • Murks, The rate and amplitude look OK, and the amplitude should improve once the oils you have used get a chance to move bed-in, also I notice that you are using default 52 degrees for the lift angle, if you get the real lift angle (assuming it's not actually 52) this will change your amplitude - maybe higher, maybe lower. I notice that the beat error is a little high, but not crazy high. At the risk of upsetting the purists, if the balance has an adjustment arm I would go ahead and try and get this <0.3 ms, but if it does not have an adjustable arm then I would probably leave well alone. Just my opinion.
    • Hi everyone on my timegrapher it showing this do a make anymore adjustment someone let me know ?    
    • Maybe I'm over simplifying this and I'm a little late to the discussion, but just by my looking at oil when I use it on a treated cap jewel  the oil stays in one nice bubble, but when I don't it spreads out to the edges of the jewel. I'm not sure (but could well be wrong) but the analogy of a waxed car and rain is accurate in this case, the wax is very hydrophobic and repels the water, however, the process epilame works by is a different physical process based upon cohesion/adhesion (oleophilic) not repulsion (oleophobic)  at least as far as I have read/observed. If one were to use a oleophobic substance equivalent to wax (hydrophobic) then one would need to create a donut shape to fence in the oil, however if one used such a strategy with a epilame which is oleophilic then the oil would sit on the ring of the donut and not in the 'donut hole', exactly where you don't want it. Even if the oil is smeared then the oleophilic epilame should pull it back to the center (see diagram below). Reference For interest the chemical in epilame is 2-(PERFLUOROHEXYL) ETHYL METHACRYLATE, CAS NO: 2144-53-8
×
×
  • Create New...