Jump to content

What is wrong with this movement


oldhippy

Recommended Posts

They had clocks in railway signal boxes?

I used to work for the railway in Western Australia in the comms section in all the archival books and diagrams I had access to I never saw a clock in a signalbox.

Other than a bent crutch which is not really a problem I don't know what is wrong

I do not know Kay & Co LTD so I looked them up to find out they were primarily a mail order company but did indeed win a contract to supply GWR clocks.

http://91.197.228.188/~kaysh/2017/03/16/kays-watches-and-clocks/

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fusee and barrel arbours stick too far out of the back plate they are not rounded or polished at the ends and most of the English fusee clocks I've seen would have brass washers where the screws go into the pillars to hold the plates together.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then you are correct. The whole clock is one big fake. It was made in India, its about 15 years old, it has been aged to make it look old.  I thought the poor so-called stamp engraving and the shocking finish would have told members that no way could it be an English movement.

As the saying goes down here where I live. Its as rough as a badgers ass. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like the other thread about Chinese carriages clocks, the Indians seem to specialise in fusee wall clocks and Ebay is full of them popular clocks faked by the Indians are R.A.F wall clocks and Railway clocks one of the big give aways with these clocks without having to see the movement is that they are hinged on the left hand side of the Bezel instead of the right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've seen plenty of fake RAF clocks but this is the first time I've heard about fake railway clocks.

Do you have a picture of what a genuine Kay & Co clock movement looks like/

When I was looking up the company yesterday I could only find pictures of the clocks showing the dial and case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Lenj said:

Do you remember this one on Ebay?? they were a wash with these, does anyone know why? Probably obvious..Anyone remember the serial number the same on every clock..lol

Len 

a-mrc-gilletlg.jpg

I would be suspicious right away. The hands are the wrong colour, the writing on the dial is not right it is not in line with 12, so I would say it’s a new dial. Hinged to the left.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep correct and NO Cillet Bland it was Gillet Bland..All have the same movement number and these are stamped 6472 LONDON, other characteristics are very thick glass in the cast brass bezel which normally is hinged to the left hand side....I feel that they were trying to tell us, that all their clocks were fake..

Len

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Based on what I learnt on this thread I decided to play 'Spot the modern fake' with Fusee clocks.

I came up with 3 that are obviously modern (last 20 or 30 years) fusee clocks made to look older.

I kept each one open in a new tab as I searched through ebay. AT the end I noticed all 3 clocks are from the same seller.

The seller does not state any of them are old and on the RAF sector clock he does state ' Not a wartime original.' So I am not saying the seller is doing anything wrong, but providing the listings just so other people can see more examples of modern fusee clocks made to look older. Although the fact he has 3 fusee clocks all with the same movements in them and different dials and does not mention anything on the clock that has GWR on it that is not original but does on the RAF clock is a bit odd.

Note the are all hinged from the left, have solid pillars with no turning on them and wire instead of chain or cat gut and the finish on some parts are average. Not to mention to me all 3 of the dials just didn't look right.

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Fusee-10-Inch-Dial-Clock/232804820013?hash=item36343fa42d:g:8ugAAOSwQQlbITNS

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/8-Inch-Dial-Fusee-RAF-Sector-Dial-Clock/332679578519?hash=item4d753f8397:g:pnMAAOSwnvVbGowW

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Fusee-12-Inch-Dial-Clock/332632724560?hash=item4d72749450:g:F4UAAOSwFWda4cMa

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On ‎18‎/‎06‎/‎2018 at 2:28 PM, Tmuir said:

But wait he has more.

I could be wrong but I think this LMS clock may not be original.

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Fusee-12-Inch-Dial-Clock/232798691876?hash=item3633e22224:g:mA8AAOSwbbRbGoyg

:D

Now this is genuine lol, just look at the hand painted dial, must be all of 3 weeks old, my granddaughter could make a better job of that..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just noticed another tell tail sign when I went back to look at the 'LMS' clock for a giggle. It has philips heads screws used in the clock case. If it was a genuine clock all screws would be fkat head screws not philips heads.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Tmuir said:

I just noticed another tell tail sign when I went back to look at the 'LMS' clock for a giggle. It has philips heads screws used in the clock case. If it was a genuine clock all screws would be fkat head screws not philips heads.

The pendulum rating nut is also wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hi I got a Jaeger LeCoultre K911 movement, where one of the stems was broken. Part no. Should be 401.  Im based in Europe and tried Cousins but its discontinued there and cant find it on Google. Is there a way out to join the ends? Or an alternative movement to source parts from? 
    • The part was how it fell out of the movement - the train wheel bridge wasn’t screwed in.    I’ll probably dismantle the part, if I can, to work it out.    The train of wheels ran fine - it was only once the keyless works were installed I noticed the problem. 
    • Hello, I am about 5 months into watchmaking and I love it!   The attention to precise detail is what really attracts me to it. (and the tools!) I am working on a 16 jewel 43mm pocket watch movement.   There are no markings besides a serial number (122248) .  The balance staff needs replacement. The roller side pivot broke off.  I successfully removed the hairspring using Bergeon 5430's.  I successfully removed the roller using Bergeon 2810.   Did i mention I love the tools?! I removed the staff from the balance wheel using a vintage K&D staff removal tool  with my Bergeon 15285 (that's the one that comes with a micrometer adjustment so it can be used as a jewel press as well as a traditional staking tool...it's sooooo cool...sorry..  can you tell i love the tools?) No more digressing..  I measured the damaged staff in all the relevant areas but I have to estimate on some because one of the pivots is missing. A = Full length  A= 4.80mm  (that's without the one pivot...if you assume that the missing pivot is the same length as the other pivot (I'm sure it's not)  then A = 5.12 mm...(can I assume 5.00mm here?) F=  Hair spring collet seat  F=  .89mm   (safe to assume .90 here? .. I am sure that my measurement's would at least contain  .01 mm error ?) G = balance wheel seat  G = 1.23 mm  (1.20mm?) H  =  roller staff  H =  .59mm  (.60 mm?) B  = bottom of the wheel to roller pivot   B  = 2.97mm  (3.00 mm?)     here I am estimating  again because this pivot is missing. So my friends, and I thank you profusely,  can you point me in the right direction as to how to proceed? Do i buy individual staffs?  or an assortment?   Since I don't know exactly the name of the manufacturer, will that be a fatal hindrance?   Tbh, I'm not even sure what country of origin this movement is. Thank you!    
    • Thats why i asked that question earlier, what happens if lubrication is placed directly on top of epilame ?  As opposed to walled within its non epilamed area . I'm not saying its right, i have no idea , just asking questions. 
    • thinking of where epilam should be removed did you know there was a patent that covers this? At least for the escapement I'm attaching it. GB1057607A-1 epilame.pdf
×
×
  • Create New...