Jump to content

Sticky hairspring; how to demag and what does the hs alloy do?


Recommended Posts

Its hard to see, but you may need to add timing washers and not just move the screws. If they are free running when turned slightly then you will need washers. If they are still tight-ish, go for half a turn each to start. Remember, just the 2 nearest the arms.

Best to turn with a pin vice to avoid damage, and with the balance removed.

 

Edited by StuartBaker104
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/4/2018 at 1:25 PM, rogart63 said:

Looks okay to me. But when i have some trouble with sticky hairspring. I sometimes clean it i acetone . Just a quick rinse will do. Or use a brush and then naptha . As the naptha doesn't remove the old oil properly. 

Yes, I almost always use Acetone on the balance and finish off with Naphtha in the U/S.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Before jumping in with poising the balance, make absolutely sure that the hairspring is not sticking anywhere or touching anything (especially in the fast position. Then inspect the portion of the hairspring where it sits between the index pins. It should be centred and “breathe” between the two. The gap should be approximately 1.5x the hairspring thickness, ie. it should just fit. 

Once that’s done, you can look at poise and also slowing the overall rate. As Stuart mentions, you can add weight evenly at the arms to drop the rate. 

If it were my watch, I’d look for a new balance complete, unless you fancy a difficult challenge. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi rodabod and thanks for the feedback!

After the repinning operation, demag, cleaning etc. I think it’s running correctly (but too fast due to the shortened hs).

I adapted the beatfrequency manually on my timegrapher to get horizontal lines and it looks pretty ok.

Your comment about the hs passing the index pins is interesting and a thing I would like to understand better.

The more ”modern” movements I have worked on often have the hs end re-shaped in a circular fashion to allow the hs to stay centered over the entire adjustment range. The raulhorology link in this thread is a good example.

I very rarely see this implemented on the older movements from the 30’s - 50’s where the hs simply ends along the spiral path which makes it hard if not impossible to maintain that centered position and the hs movement between the index pins over the balance rotation becomes very much of a compromise.

I would appreciate any thoughts over this from the experienced.

I would like to find a complete balance replacement but think this will be a hard find. The shock protection is of unusual kind and I doubt there are many parts out there to find. And besides, I paid less than 10 euro fot the thing to start with so heavy investments are hard to motivate... :-)




Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m not quite sure what you mean. The hairspring between the regulating pins should be free wherever the regulator is between the h/spring it should be able to bounce between the two pins. It should never just rest against the regulator.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Oldhippy,

I was just referring to the fact that I seldom see the more advanced hs endings as in the attached photo on the older watches I tend to spend time on.

One purpose of this elaborate shape must be that it allows for a constant hs radius over the regulator slow-fast span.

Without this shape (as in the older movements) the hs radius will vary slightly over the regulator slow-fast span and make the whole thing much more of a compromize when it comes to the hs position in between the pins.0d33a6e6c6dd197150f27f437c14575e.jpg


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi all,

To wrap this up....

I attempted to loosen the timing screws as proposed and was able to make them turn but can’t see any radial movement, so I guess there’s no real thread on them, just push in.

To have any effect I would have to remove entirely and shim under.

Won’t go there right now (or ever...) and just slowed down as much as possible with the regulator (way outside the scale but no apparent mistreatment of the hs).

Still runs a bit fast but runs and I’m happy with that.

I have attached a photo of the assembled watch for those interested.

Thanks for all help through this process!

/bsoderling



Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

IMG_0610.JPG
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The 73 was my setting lever make Mike, same piece fitted to your 72. I enjoyed working on the movement, fair quality.
    • Well it's arrived, and it's a pleasant surprise. A 11.5''' 21 jewel FHF 72. It's running (just) and looks in great condition.  It needs a good service, and new crown and strap.  It's a front loader but doesn't have a split stem. There's a small lever (visible when you remover the bezel), which when moved, frees the stem and the movement from the case (a new one on me).  
    • Hello and welcome from Leeds, England. 
    • Hi All, I'm Geoff and I've been working on/with watches and clocks since I was thirteen. My dad was a watchmaker and while he did not want me in the field as a profession, I've always maintained a pretty good working knowledge. In the '70's I kinda got pulled back into things because Quartz revolution began and he only had limited electronic knowledge. So we combined skills. He the watchmaker and me the electronics tech. Being here in NY helped because we got to know the folks from Bulova, Seiko, Citizen, and WOSIC. H.B. Freid was my Dad's teacher and I was fortunate enough to get to know him too. I still maintain a bench here at home and occasionally work on watches for friends although the hands aren't what they used to be. Not going to be working on any FHF59 or AS1012's any time soon. Oddly enough though my years working with the field taught me how to work on almost anything else mechanical and mostly electronic. Since I was the one in the family who maintained Dad's cleaning and timing machines. those experiences carried over quite nicely into the worlds of recording and audio as well as others. I look forward to the discussions and maybe still learning a trick or two. Cheers to all and nice to be here.  
    • The best and almost only way to achieve the magical £ 4.04 individual watch cost is via the loophole ploy of job lot buys Ross. Dividing down the outlay by the number of watches purchased. I've managed it many times in the past, this then gives you the extra edge of choosing any watch from that lot. Maybe we should have an all time winner, whos prepared to troll  through the last four years of posts and pick some worthy contenders. Unfortunately i have a poorly shoulder so i cant raise my right hand and my left shoulder is out in sympathy for my right shoulder. Put your right hand up if you think i talk a load of bull 💩     🖐 Tom's comment is purely restricted to  the Bergeon culture of " lets rip off everyone on the planet " Voted , i thought to keep it in pounds as originally designed and out of respect for Andy . Personally i would have kept the £4.04 as I'm very traditionalist and dont like change but i know how hard you overseas guys are finding it and i believe in fair play. I expect to be posting the occasional Omega or Longines but then you brought this on yourself so dont get jealous Scott 😆
×
×
  • Create New...