Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi,

 

I came across an old tank style watch where the movement must be front loaded as there’s no case back to remove, the movement sits deep in the hollowed casing.

 

I have limited experience from split stems. I have encountered one where the stem ended in a ”hook” and I could slide out the movement by finding the correct turning angle for the crown.

 

This one doesn’t seem to work that way... I have attached a photo showing where the stem goes into the casing and besides the stem being of wider diameter than usual, there’s also what appears like slots on opposite sides that I suppose may indicate where the stem can separate?

 

I have tried to pull the crown hard but nothing happens and I’m afraid something may break.

 

I would appreciate some advice here and if it’s just brute force that counts...

 

/Bsoderlingb695c9e398b24e0b766e03d605d2993d.jpg

 

 

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Posted

Hi Chopin, that was for sure speedy response :-),

And right you are, I tried a pair of wire cutters with steep edges under the crown and off it came...

Photo is attached. Pretty nice movement, don’t you think? And actually ticking with some determination.

Thanks!
f642977e1a3d26e3f44fbcf036a21992.jpg


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Posted

In the first photo, the setting lever spring is broken. Just wondering if the broken bit is wedged and is preventing the two piece stem from disengaging.

Posted

Thanks oldhippy, good thought but not the case as you can in the recent posting.

On setting lever springs, I find these to be very often gone on the old-timers I through myself at. Luckily the watch isn’t really depending on this ”feature” and I most often accept it for a fact as chasing up the correct part can be both endless and, if I find the part, expensive

Again thanks for all input!


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Posted (edited)

These crowns do indeed come out with difficulty but then again it's better than having a crown slip off while simply adjusting the time.

Indeed that is a lovely little movement and it sure looks to be of, more or less, high quality. What is it ?

You can use pliers or really thick tweezers but you can try and put something between the metal and the teeth of the tool that you use to protect the metal.

Edited by Chopin
Posted

The dial says ”Mowy” but there’s no id visible anywhere on the movement 240bd77174dd9a534d3f376dce87d2ae.jpgso I presume it’s a ”generic” of some kind.

What intrigued me was the rather elaborate casing design with all its bits an pieces... phota attached.




Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted
5 hours ago, Chopin said:

I can't tell from the photo what we're dealing with here but some stems and crowns are male/female type.

Longines-Admiral-4.jpg

   the 2 part stem as pictured above is the standard for the front loader vintage wrist watch.  use an old pair of tweezers to apply an even pressure when prying it off.  new watches may be different.  vin

Posted
18 hours ago, bsoderling said:

Hi Chopin, that was for sure speedy response :-),

And right you are, I tried a pair of wire cutters with steep edges under the crown and off it came...

Photo is attached. Pretty nice movement, don’t you think? And actually ticking with some determination.

Thanks!
f642977e1a3d26e3f44fbcf036a21992.jpg


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Whats the size of that movement? It's either a FHF or a ETA i think. 

Posted
19 hours ago, bsoderling said:

The dial says ”Mowy” but there’s no id visible anywhere on the movement 240bd77174dd9a534d3f376dce87d2ae.jpgso I presume it’s a ”generic” of some kind.

What intrigued me was the rather elaborate casing design with all its bits an pieces... phota attached.




Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

    the case appears to be a Wyler.  vin

Posted

Have two "Wyler" movements here. wonder if any of the can be the same. Has no markings on them . Only that one of them has a Wyler dial. 

Posted

Hi and thanks for all the interesting info.

Wyler is an unknown for me. Will google a bit to catch up.

The movement baseplate measures 17,5 x 26 mm.

I have attached a photo of the dial. Have seen better but also a lot worse :-)





a33c4b29c436e3b75138d971253266b8.jpg




Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Posted

Indeed....found a Wyler thread on watchuseek that talks about a close to identical watch.

The movement is mentioned as MST 312 in the thread. Any info on that is appreciated.

The one I got has some kind of shock proof add-on though, so maybe it’s somewhat younger?

I presume the ”wy” in ”Mowy” is there to indicate a sub-brand to Wyler. There seems to have been variations on that theme at the time.

I´ll make sure to post the final result of my efforts when done with the service and clean-up.




Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hi, this is the first place I found when looking for advice so I hope someone could advise me.  Im completely new to touching watches but I’ve always wondered how they work.  I’ve bought a cheap movement, an ETA replica to take apart and rebuild.  Im thinking I’ll need some screwdrivers, tweezers, movement holder and a loop? My goal is just to have a go first and see if I enjoy it enough before buying more tools.  Do I buy cheap tools for now and get better quality tools later if I enjoy it like I think I will? or will the cheap tools be a pain and take some of the fun out of it?  With quality tools being relatively expensive I’m unsure what to buy.    Any advice would be greatly appreciated!
    • Yeah I have seen 44-56 documented for Elgin 18 size elsewhere. I have the style of gauge that's like a set of feeler gauges and I never noticed before today it is faintly stamped "Elgin". Pictured is the way I have been measuring. I am going to go to a larger jewel than the 42 that had been in there. I recently won an auction on a big set of Fitrite jewels all in the little bottles, to discover that the what's actually in the bottles bears no relation to the chart of sizes printed on the box. In most cases it seems to be all mixed so in fact I have about 24 little bottles and thousands of assorted jewels of all diameters and lengths, which is better than nothing. But since I don't have a micrometer with a table, measuring for the exact diameter will be a big job. Instead I will test a lot of them in the fork slot the same way I measure with the gauge. But this is still the next thing. I have to get the escapement to unlock first.
    • it would be nice to have the exact model of the watch the or a picture so we can see exactly what you're talking about. this is because the definition of Swiss watch could be a variety of things and it be helpful if we could see exactly the watch your dealing with then in professional watch repair at least some professionals they do pre-cleaned watches. In other words the hands and dial come off and the entire movement assembled goes through a cleaning machine sometimes I think a shorter bath perhaps so everything is nice and clean for disassembly makes it easier to look for problems. Then other professionals don't like pre-cleaning because it basically obliterates the scene of the crime. Especially when dealing with vintage watches where you're looking for metal filings and problems that may visually go away with cleaning. Then usually super sticky lubrication isn't really a problem for disassembly and typically shouldn't be a problem on a pallet fork bridge because there shouldn't be any lubrication on the bridge at all as you typically do not oil the pallet fork pivots.  
    • A few things you should find out before you can mske a decision of what to do. As Richard said, what is the crown and all of the crown components made of . Then also the stem .  The crown looks to have a steel washer that retains a gasket. So be careful with what chemicals you use to dissolve any stem adhesives or the use of heat. You might swell or melt the gasket unless you are prepared to change that also . The steel washer maybe reactive to alum. Something I've just used to dissolve a broken screw from a plate. First drilled out the centre of the screw with a 0.5mm carbide . Dipped only the section that held the broken screw in Rustins rust remover. This is 40 % phosphoric acid. 3 days and the screw remains were completely dissolved, no trace of steel in the brass threads. A black puddle left in the solution.
    • I suppose this will add to the confusion I have a roller jewel assortment. It lists out American pocket watches for Elgin 18 size and even 16 size it's a 50. But not all the various companies used 50-50 does seem to be common one company had a 51 and the smallest is 43. American parts are always interesting? Francis Elgin for mainsprings will tell you the thickness of the spring other companies will not even though the spring for the same number could come in a variety of thicknesses. But if we actually had the model number of your watch we would find it probably makes a reference that the roller jewel came in different dimensions. So overlook the parts book we find that? So it appears to be 18 and 16 size would be the same sort of the arson different catalog numbers and as I said we don't have your Mongol know which Log number were supposed to be using. Variety of materials garnered her sapphire single or double but zero mention about diameters. Then in a section of rollers in this case rollers with jewels we do get this down in the notes section Roller specifications but of course zero reference to the jewel size. I was really hoping the roller jewel assortment would give us sizes it doesn't really. But it does show a picture of how one particular roller jewel gauge is used  
×
×
  • Create New...