Jump to content

New quartz movement, pulses but won't run?


Recommended Posts

Greetings!

I was having an issue with a quartz citizen and decided to bypass the issue by replacing the movement.

The hands engage from the crown just fine, the watch pulses on the tester, but the hands won't move.

What could be wrong?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, jdm said:

Could be that is defective from factory as it can happen with mass produced products, get a replacement or refund.

It could be.

I'm a little curious though, because the movement that came out of it was doing the same thing. Could something happen in the installation process to cause this to occur?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Apex86 said:

I'm a little curious though, because the movement that came out of it was doing the same thing. Could something happen in the installation process to cause this to occur?

Quartz mov.t often fails in a mysterious way. You can't see or really diagnose a faulty circuit board, although you can diagnose an interrupted coil. And then you find the part is not available or replaceable. Fortunately Miyota/Citizen are very cheap to replace entirely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Apex86 said:

I'm not sure, I have a generic watch tester (https://www.esslinger.com/watch-battery-and-watch-tester-with-pulse-tester/). Would that allow me to do it?

No, you need a low current multimeter to do that. But it wouldn't help, after you find that it draws the right current, or doesn't, there is still nothing you can do about it. You could have better luck with a line free device, which emits an impulse to free up movn't stuck by dried oil.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jdm said:

it wouldn't help, after you find that it draws the right current, or doesn't, there is still nothing you can do about it.

It absolutely can help, because it lets you identify if the train is too heavily loaded which may lead you to identify a fault (hands rubbing being a common example). It also can help to identify if the coil is open-circuit, as the current draw remains lower than expected when running. Looks like the tester has a basic coil test function.

To help free the train if you suspect it is jammed, you can advance one of the wheels at the rotor end of the train gently with an oiler.

I would try un-casing the movement, remove the dial, and just install a seconds hand (if fitted) to check for operation. Also make sure the battery terminal is good and that the insulators are present where they are meant to be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, rodabod said:

It absolutely can help, because it lets you identify if the train is too heavily loaded which may lead you to identify a fault (hands rubbing being a common example). It also can help to identify if the coil is open-circuit, as the current draw remains lower than expected when running. Looks like the tester has a basic coil test function.

All nice and good things when working on more complex, mov.t which are are difficult to replace, or for which parts are available, etc. But a Miyota/Citizen like the OP has cost typically $5 or less. The tester linked doesn't do anything that an household multimeter can't do, but cost twice as much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, jdm said:

All nice and good things when working on more complex, mov.t which are are difficult to replace, or for which parts are available, etc. But a Miyota/Citizen like the OP has cost typically $5 or less. The tester linked doesn't do anything that an household multimeter can't do, but cost twice as much.

Well, the hands do move freely when operating the crown. I'm not sure if that tells us anything.

I don't have an issue with replacing the movement. I am trying to understand what is happening because the previous movement was doing the same thing and I'm trying to see if anything I did caused this to happen.

If the movement became magnetized, would this be the outcome?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Apex86 said:

If the movement became magnetized, would this be the outcome?

No. Quartz mov.t have a lot of magnetism in them already, from the rotor.
And when they fail, or are bad from factory, they won't run. A quite common occurrence in fact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, jdm said:

All nice and good things when working on more complex, mov.t which are are difficult to replace, or for which parts are available, etc. But a Miyota/Citizen like the OP has cost typically $5 or less. The tester linked doesn't do anything that an household multimeter can't do, but cost twice as much.

Yes, but your comment was in reply to my suggestion that current draw is a very important measurement. You can't reliably service a quartz watch without one. Otherwise Witschi wouldn't sell any of their testers. It's almost analagous to measuring balance amplitude.

Agree about the point regarding replacing the entire movement, but it may not be the movement itself at fault.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, rodabod said:

Yes, but your comment was in reply to my suggestion that current draw is a very important measurement. You can't reliably service a quartz watch without one. Otherwise Witschi wouldn't sell any of their testers. It's almost analagous to measuring balance amplitude.

I agree with that. I had been looking for a multimeter capable of measuring µA using low voltage, and the cheapest I could find was about EUR 100. Buying Witschi is out of question for an hobbyist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is some simpler method for current measurement using a multimeter which I can't remember just now. May just involve running a large value resistance in series with the circuit and then measuring the voltage drop across it to determine the current flow. Would rely on the circuit having a very high input impedance though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, rodabod said:

There is some simpler method for current measurement using a multimeter which I can't remember just now. May just involve running a large value resistance in series with the circuit and then measuring the voltage drop across it to determine the current flow. Would rely on the circuit having a very high input impedance though.

Correct. But making the fixture to connect to the mov.t leads, plus fitting a resistor, and then do the corrective calculation really exceeds the effort one normally wants to spend on something like that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure how much effort it would be for someone who's familiar with soldering. I have access to a Witschi, but if I didn't then I might make a jig. It's what the BHI suggest doing.

Possibly going slightly off topic, but my original point is that measuring current draw is important for serious quartz servicing work. The OP may not consider theirs to be serious work of course.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ive never used epilame H only information i have read and mentally stored about it mostly from Nicklesilver here and elsewhere ( the fork horns thing ), maybe the residue powder that is removed has some grinding effect ? So probably a good idea to limit its application areas to only the absolute necessary. Yes as far as i know epilame rubs off relatively easy, the technique of running the watch to make a groove through it first in the pallet stones where the lubrication is then placed. This i understand creates the barrier for the lube to sit up to. If i can find a good balance of pros and cons of its use then thats one process i can avoid by using a thixotropic lube on the stones. The epilame i would say allows for a more fluid lubrication to be used that would increase amplitude on low beat movements. The stearic acid powder is extremely cheap, the problem is the fuming process to coat parts, is not selective , the whole part has to treated in this method. If epilame residue can cause wear then thats not good, if I remember the conclusion was not proved entirely just a general assumption between watchmakers. The thread is out there somewhere, the same discussion is also old on a facebook group. Ive never used epilame H only information i have read and mentally stored about it mostly from Nicklesilver here and elsewhere ( the fork horns thing ), maybe the residue powder that is removed has some grinding effect ? So probably a good idea to limit its application areas to only the absolute necessary. Yes as far as i know epilame rubs off relatively easy, the technique of running the watch to make a groove through it first in the pallet stones where the lubrication is then placed. This i understand creates the barrier for the lube to sit up to. If i can find a good balance of pros and cons of its use then thats one process i can avoid by using a thixotropic lube on the stones. The epilame i would say allows for a more fluid lubrication to be used that would increase amplitude on low beat movements. The stearic acid powder is extremely cheap, the problem is the fuming process to coat parts, is not selective , the whole part has to treated in this method. If epilame residue can cause wear then thats not good, if I remember the conclusion was not proved entirely just a general assumption between watchmakers. The thread is out there somewhere, the same discussion is also old on a facebook group. If its a potential problem for amateurs to use then i would prefer not to take the risk .
    • Following on from my question about identifying screws in the AS2063 movement that basically fell out of the case in bits, I’m pleased to report that I’ve got it all back together, and the movement is running pretty well.    But… There’s something wrong with the keyless works and hand setting. It’s fine in winding and quickset date position - these work - but in hand setting position winding the crown turns the whole gear train.  I don’t really understand how it’s meant to work. It doesn’t have a traditional friction fit cannon pinion.  The second wheel is unusual with a pair of smaller pinions on it, which seem to interact with the barrel and the motion works.    Could this be the problem? I must admit I just cleaned it and popped it in place when reassembling the gear train. I’ve lubricated the pivots but didn’t do anything to the extra bits on the second wheel.    Does this make sense and is anyone able to figure out what I’m doing wrong? Thanks in advance, as always.    ETA - the parts list calls it the Great Wheel, not second wheel. 
    • You're thinking metal to jewel in general I guess. Maybe it would be a good idea to peg the pallet staff jewel hole on the main plate after the epilame treatment. I think that could work as it is my impression that the epilame doesn't sit very hard, but I could be wrong about that so feel free to educate me. I didn't remember that 9501 was thixotropic (thanks for the link). That would mean it's even runnier during impact (lower viscosity) so perhaps it's time I get some fresh grease as mine seems a bit too runny. What I have seen is a whitish surface after washing but it goes away if I scrub the surface with a brush in a degreaser (Horosolv). I don't think it embeds itself in the metal but sticks very hard to the metal. I don't worry too much about the cleaning solution. I just want perfectly clean parts and my solution can be replaced for little money (ELMA RED 1:9). Anyway, I quite often need "to strip back and rebuild" and scrubbing parts by hand isn't exactly the most stimulating part of a service. Just got confirmation that Moebius 9501 has a lower viscosity (68 cSt at 20° C) than 9504 (305 cSt at 20°). The viscosity of Molykote DX is 285-315 cSt at -25° to +125° C. I was surprised to see that the viscosity of Moebius 9010 (thin oil!) is higher (150 cSt at 20°) than my 9501 grease!
    • I’ve had a couple movements where it is clear the previous watchmaker was diligent with lubrication but the old epilam had turned to a fine white powder covering the pallet fork and keyless parts, which can’t be good for parts. I’m spare with epi since I don’t know how long it takes to degrade to that state…
    • I have read some suggestions that it can cause wear , particularly on the fork horns of a fully treated pallet fork. I've had half a kilo of steriac acid powder on a shelf for almost a year now, might have a little play today with a heater and a jar.  I think its because it gets into their cleaning solutions Mike. Theirs or anyone else's that services the watch next time, or if they need to strip back and rebuild. Could preclean but thats all time for a pro. I thought the idea was for the epilame to create a barrier, a wall between the lubrication and anything else, so the lube cant spread.
×
×
  • Create New...