Jump to content

Watch hands alignment.


Recommended Posts

Morning, all.

What a lovely day.

Here's something that has been causing quite a lot of problems. (Well............ it has for me!)

When refitting watch hands, how can you be certain that the  hands will land accurately on the 

minute markers and not (As is so often the case) in-between?

You just cannot keep removing them and trying again and again.

I swear that it's easier to fit a gear train bridge on a Timex, than it is to align watch hands!

Anybody got advice, or tips on the subject?

Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not just the seconds hands on quartz watches, but any watch.

You know the sort of thing I mean.

 You get them fitted exactly on the 'seconds marker,' then once powered up 

(Or wound) they end up in-between!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course they end up in between. On mechanical watches hour, minute and seconds hands rotate in a continuous sweeping motion.

I'm a little confused...  Are you saying that you want the hour, minute and seconds hand to ALL be in the exact perfect condition all the time ?

Such as if the time is 9:30:30 seconds then the hour hand should be between 9 and 10, the minute hand should be at 6 and the seconds hand should be between the 30 and 31 markers ?

You can do that easily with the hour and minute hands but with the seconds hand I believe you won't be able to have it that precisely all the time. Some people don't even notice it. It helps to have a movement with a hacking feature.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Morning, all.
What a lovely day.
Here's something that has been causing quite a lot of problems. (Well............ it has for me!)
When refitting watch hands, how can you be certain that the  hands will land accurately on the 
minute markers and not (As is so often the case) in-between?
You just cannot keep removing them and trying again and again.
I swear that it's easier to fit a gear train bridge on a Timex, than it is to align watch hands!
Anybody got advice, or tips on the subject?
Thanks.

Make sure the watch is not running. Then align the hour hand to 12. Then stick the minute hand with rodico half way down the hand place it in position. With your other hand press it down all the while slightly adjusting it holding the ridico. This will work.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you,  jdrichard, that sounds like just the job and absolutely spot on.
Why didn't I think of that!
Excellent. 10/10

Took me Two Years to figure how to hold the hand steady while pushing it into position.:)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you have a watch with date or day-date it's even trickier to get it right. Turn it around until the date flicks over at 24 00 . Then i place the hour hand on a little loose. But not pressing it all the way home. Then i test that it actually change at the right time some turns. Then press it all the way down flush with the hour wheel top. Then do the same with the minute hand. And make sure they are aligned at 6 a clock also. If there is some misalignment i can adjust it a little by slightly moving it very gentle with a pegwood or similar . But only if it's not pressed all the way down. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The wheels turned fine. I set the escape wheel in the epoxy when it had just ‘skinned’ and wasn’t set, made sure it spun with the 4th wheel, and let it set.    After cleaning I assembled the barrel and wheel train - all fine. Moving the barrel the escape wheel spun freely. I put a bit of 9010 in my epoxy setting.    It went wrong when I put the pallet fork in. It wasn’t seated right (no jewels) and the escape wheel  knocked a pallet jewel out. I have no idea how to reset a pallet jewel - epoxy again? I’m not spending any more time on this one - it’s missing hands and the front half of the case anyway, and I have more watches ready to put on the bench. 
    • No John, we don't want Mark to change anything, we are just scared of losing a brilliant forum and losing contact with each other.  As pointed out, this forum is full of knowledge and I for one,  consider the regulars friends. I would hate to lose contact with you and the others.   PS, this forum is really important to me. 
    • one little minor problem with your chemistry experiment here which is what exactly is epilam? In other words is it an exact substance with the chemical you specify or is it a term? For instance originally it was steric acid either dissolved in some sort of solvent or it was applied by vaporizing it. Then now it's all kinds of different things the watch companies all have different ideas there's a whole bunch of patents. So is not always an exact substance.   let me snip out a image from the patent that I attached up above. Notice I highlighted something it seems to disagree with your evaluation.  
    • I guess You had to try, as it would be hard to sleep without that try, but, I know the result before the experiment... As I told before, the friction will be so big that the wheel will not turn. The pivots have to be thin and polished - the bigger the number of the wheel (2th, 3gh, 4th...), the thinner the pivot. What You are trying to do is possible, but forming the new thin pivot must be done on lathe. Thus the wheel will get shorter, but can have new pivot without the drilling for normal standard repivoting. Then piece of brass can be soldered under the pivot hole in the bridge and new hole drilled in it to form the new bearing.  Well, this way is not the recommended one, not quite correct, but it is possible to do for the excersize... When I say lathe, lathe may be verry simple, someting like turns, but made of what one has in reach of his hands. If You want to try, I will try to guide
    • yes by all means let's gather up our weapons tar feathers find the nearest tree in case Mark is not agreeable to our terms on our demands and storm his Castle. I don't quite understand what you're trying to do here? In other words you want Mark to somehow guarantee that the group will live on forever no matter what? You want Mark to somehow change his business model of what is trying to do or should we just take the group away from him? oh and is quite possible that Mark never realized that his discussion group would take on a life of its own. That the members of the group would like to continue on forever.  
×
×
  • Create New...