Jump to content

Seiko 2220-0430 Crystal Fitting


Recommended Posts

Hey Guys,

Couple of questions, I picked up this Seiko 2220-0430 with a chipped crystal. I was able with just a small amount of pressure to press the glass out from the back out of the bezel.

Am I correct in assuming that I need to use a crystal cement/epoxy to fit a new crystal?
Also, is a flat Cousins/Sternkreuz glass/sapphire crystal going to have a similar bevel to the one shown on the front face of the crystal?

Thanks in advance!

 

 

2220-1.jpg

2220-2.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know about sapphire but the mineral glass on cousins looks like yours at first glance.

Are you sure that this is the original glass of the watch ? Usually glasses nowadays (glass glasses not acrylic) are held in place by a plastic gasket. Either it might not be the original glass for it and, maybe, it used an acrylic either you'll need a plastic gasket as well.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the insight!

From what I can see online I'm fairly confident it is the original, but can't be certain. There are no spares available anywhere I know of.

The crystal is approx 1.3mm in depth, the bezel has about a 0.6mm recess and the crystal apprears to just fit into this slot with the rest of the crystal protruding and showing the bevel. Would there be sufficient room in this 0.6mm to fit a gasket too?

The wall of the recess seems to be dead straight too, would I be right in thinking if it was an acrylic crystal the recess would be shaped to retain the crystal once fitted?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regarding the acrylic crystal, not necessarily, but even so this is not the type of watch that probably came with an acrylic. Seiko usually does mineral glass, not acrylic, like the vintage Swiss watches.

Most of the watches that I've encountered have had a gasket as well and yes your bezel should have space for one but, I guess, since yours didn't come with one maybe they really didn't use a gasket after all.

To go for the original look I'd just get a standard cousins mineral glass. I don't know if there's a difference between the sternkreuz and the cheaper one. The cheaper one seems to look like the one that you have.

Edited by Chopin
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, JBerry said:

From what I can see online I'm fairly confident it is the original, but can't be certain. There are no spares available anywhere I know of.

The crystal is approx 1.3mm in depth, the bezel has about a 0.6mm recess and the crystal apprears to just fit into this slot with the rest of the crystal protruding and showing the bevel. Would there be sufficient room in this 0.6mm to fit a gasket too?

The wall of the recess seems to be dead straight too, would I be right in thinking if it was an acrylic crystal the recess would be shaped to retain the crystal once fitted?

No acrylic on modern Seiko watches, all you need is a flat miner cystal and a gasket if the original is gone or damaged.

Also, no "approx" has place on watch repair, you need a vernier caliper to measure exactly.

Many threads on the subject, use the search function.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, JBerry said:

I do have a vernier calipers, I say approx because no €20 uncalibrated calipers is 100% accurate,

These are 100% OK, generic crystals come in 0.1mm dia. increment and no special thickness like 1.35 or 1.6,mm that Seiko often use, just get the closer one and will be fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Just as a conclusion, the original Seiko crystal is of 31.0mm diameter. So I think it's safe to assume the crytal is epoxied directly into the bezel. A 0.70mm Sternkreuz MST crystal of 31.0mm diameter was a perfect fit, secured with some nasty Bisphenol-A Seiko epoxy.

photo_2018-05-09_19-17-06 (2).jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • These types of hairsprings become weak with age and very fragile. Which I expect it is that giving you trouble, and that wheel is not the correct one, if it were not bent I don't think the movement would run as the teeth are not the correct height. The problem you have is price which depends on you. It can be repaired but is it worth it to you, because there is little value in the clock. A wheel can be made and hairspring replaced. Or hang on to it and keep looking on ebay which is your best bet for replacement parts or even a complete movement but it will be like finding a needle in a haystack. 
    • I did that also for a few movements - well, mainly in/around the train jewels. I made big efforts to epilame the mainplate WITHOUT getting Epilame into the Pallet fork jewels (where it's not supposed to be, right?). I made litte barriers with Rodico around that jewel and used drops from a syringe to apply on the rest.  However, I've now stopped doing this. For three reasons: 1. It's a hassle and consumes more of this liquid gold. 2. I didn't see the need when using HP1000/HP1300 lubricants and grease for most part. The two places where I'd use 9010 (i.e. escape wheel and balance) receive Epilame in specific places... or the cap-jewel-setting of the balance suspends the oil sufficiently be capillary action (see my "conflict" about using Epilame on the balance jewels).  3. Lastly, and here I really wonder about yours and others' experiences: I felt that applying Epliame to the train jewels left them looking hazy (borderline dirty) compared to the (painstakingly achieved) sparkly clean results of my cleaning process. I just can't help but think that the Epilame residuals would mix with the oil and cause more friction/wear. I don't know.    simple: it'll stay there. It won't move any further. That's exactly what is happening if you epilame a cap stone. You end up placing the 9010 right on top of the epilame and the oil will sit nicely on that spot.
    • There are some parts on Ebay for the seiko 6020A, it may just be a waiting game for someone to strip one down, NOS will be more scarce . K would strip your movement down to the module then start looking at other seiko movement to see if that coil is used, then seek out a seiko part dealer. Also Retrowatches youtube owner Mike may give you some advice try him on his site . He also hangs around amateur watchmaking groups.
    • I would agree, in order to work harden something you need to exceed it's yield strength when it moves from the elastic zone to the plastic zone and you get permanent deformation and work hardening which is fairly close to its failure point, relatively speaking and dependent on the material/alloy of course. In theory you can load something constantly within its elastic range and not suffer work hardening issues.
    • Probably easier to get a complete new movement - but CousinsUK list it as discontinued. Maybe someone on here knows a substitute movement ?
×
×
  • Create New...