Jump to content

American pocket watch winding clutch problem


khunter

Recommended Posts

So I have this 12s Illinois that I've been working on, cleaning and oiling, everything is fine. Except. The winding clutch binds on the "backward" wind, winding the spring the action is fine, on the "clutching" turn the teeth of the clutch wheels are almost like they're glued together. Everything has been cleaned, there are no worn or chipped teeth, I've tried it lubricated and dry, all with the same result, binding on the backward wind. It was fine before disassembly and cleaning. The clutch lever is free, the setting position is totally free and easy. The arbor is not bound, it's just the teeth "grabbing" each other and not releasing. Any suggestions would be great!!For some reason it won't let me upload a picture, if I figure that out I'll post it later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the absence of pictures which model of 12 size Illinois? Then usually its lubrication except you said you lubricated? So what are you lubricating with? Then occasionally I've seen with the clutch wheels they need to be replaced. Everything looks fine at least memory they looked fine and just replacing Solved the problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, khunter said:

So I have this 12s Illinois that I've been working on, cleaning and oiling, everything is fine. 

Just FYI, we have a section on this forum where most members like to introduce themselves even before asking questions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

In the absence of pictures which model of 12 size Illinois? Then usually its lubrication except you said you lubricated? So what are you lubricating with? Then occasionally I've seen with the clutch wheels they need to be replaced. Everything looks fine at least memory they looked fine and just replacing Solved the problem.

It's a 21j model 1, and yes I replaced the winding clutch assembly last night and it works fine now, what gets me is that it worked fine before cleaning. I've used mobius 8010 ( I think) and also a full synthetic that I have. I don't have D5 which is probably the best to use on the winding parts. I took all the original parts and polished the mating surfaces, the shoulders of the winding arbor, clutch teeth, etc (.5 micron diamond paste and a lot of fiddling) but haven't tried them again yet, the replacement parts just came out of an old junk movement without much more than a wipe down and they work just fine. Anyway I still can't upload pictures, maybe my file sizes are too large.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, vinn3 said:

some Illinois watches were very cheaply made,  just a learning watch.   the older ones were quite well made.   John is quite right.   you need a pix and maybe some "internet identification .  good luck, vin 

Guess it's file size, here's a picture of the clutch. Identification isn't the issue, just the sticking teeth lol. I got it fixed with another winding assembly but I would like to know why the originals stopped working after cleaning. Thanks!

2018-01-24 09.16.36.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, khunter said:

It's a 21j model 1, and yes I replaced the winding clutch assembly last night and it works fine now, what gets me is that it worked fine before cleaning. I've used mobius 8010 ( I think) and also a full synthetic that I have. I don't have D5 which is probably the best to use on the winding parts. I took all the original parts and polished the mating surfaces, the shoulders of the winding arbor, clutch teeth, etc (.5 micron diamond paste and a lot of fiddling) but haven't tried them again yet, the replacement parts just came out of an old junk movement without much more than a wipe down and they work just fine. Anyway I still can't upload pictures, maybe my file sizes are too large.

 

2018-01-24 09.16.36.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Photo of the movement. Illinois Central is the railroad that my grandfather and father worked on, so it holds some sentimental value. I think it cleaned up nicely considering the shape it arrived in. All the screws and regulator, spring, etc were hand polished, complete tear down and clean/oil. I have a 10k case on it's way that it will live in, and the dial  (not pictured) also is marked Illinois Central and is in fine shape. New hands will be fitted as the old ones were not worth refinishing (broken tip on the minute hand).

2018-01-24 10.31.50.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's a very nice quality movement. If you want to look at some cheap rubbish, see pics. It's from an old trench watch. The balance staff pivots are more like something you would find on a child's spinning top toy. I've seen something similar on a Russian wall clock.
If you are using diamond paste to polish parts, you need to remove all trace, any residual will cause accelerated wear.49369f74e58b4ca824db920518407726.jpgcc440a9f7bd4b6e6942eb5a9c49fc78b.jpg

Sent from my SM-T585 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, digginstony said:

That's a very nice quality movement. If you want to look at some cheap rubbish, see pics. It's from an old trench watch. The balance staff pivots are more like something you would find on a child's spinning top toy. I've seen something similar on a Russian wall clock.
If you are using diamond paste to polish parts, you need to remove all trace, any residual will cause accelerated wear.49369f74e58b4ca824db920518407726.jpgcc440a9f7bd4b6e6942eb5a9c49fc78b.jpg

Sent from my SM-T585 using Tapatalk
 

The parts all went back through the cleaner, followed by a broach to get inside the recesses, then a wipe with the rodico....:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's some pictures of the freshly polished old parts under 30x magnification. It's really hard to see in the photos but all the mating or friction surfaces are pretty much mirror finish. I haven't tried it in the movement yet, I may just leave it for another project sometime as the one I have in there now is working perfectly. 

2018-01-24 21.07.52.jpg

2018-01-24 21.08.24.jpg

2018-01-24 21.09.01.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't think there is an 8010 lubrication? Then I thought all of the 8000 series was natural Or mineral oils. You have to go to 9000 series to get the synthetic oils. Then I prefer something that's a little heavier than oil PML Stem Grease W-10 Seems to be harder and harder to find though.

Illinois is interesting with the 12 size they only have I think five different models. But they have a whole bunch of different grades and those have variations the end up with lots and lots of variations. If you look at the first leg notice all the variations going down the page.

https://pocketwatchdatabase.com/search/result/illinois/3057090

This is a grade 274 next link talks about that lots and lots of variations. Then you get things like this the watch was manufactured from 1911 to 1926 Which means you get interesting parts variations between the first and the end series.

http://illinoiswatchguide.com/grade274.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

Don't think there is an 8010 lubrication? Then I thought all of the 8000 series was natural Or mineral oils. You have to go to 9000 series to get the synthetic oils. Then I prefer something that's a little heavier than oil PML Stem Grease W-10 Seems to be harder and harder to find though.

Illinois is interesting with the 12 size they only have I think five different models. But they have a whole bunch of different grades and those have variations the end up with lots and lots of variations. If you look at the first leg notice all the variations going down the page.

https://pocketwatchdatabase.com/search/result/illinois/3057090

This is a grade 274 next link talks about that lots and lots of variations. Then you get things like this the watch was manufactured from 1911 to 1926 Which means you get interesting parts variations between the first and the end series.

http://illinoiswatchguide.com/grade274.html

I purchased the mobeus oil several years ago and cant remember the actual number. I recently switched to a full synthetic (not mobeus) as an experiment and have been pleased with the results so far.

That website on the 12 size Illinois movements is interesting and I hadn't seen it before. I generally stick to 16 and 18 size movements, but the Illinois Central will almost always get my attention. I recently restored another 12s 17j IC and gave it to my brother for Christmas. 

2018-01-25 22.49.01.jpg

2018-01-25 22.56.30.png

Edited by khunter
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, khunter said:

So I finally got the case and finished this one off.

Very nice, for jobs like this if you document all the steps and present them in a single topic, we have a dedicated section called walk-throughs.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, digginstony said:

Very nice job. Looks like you've used something like "Birchwood Casey" gun blue for the hands. They look great.

Sent from my SM-T585 using Tapatalk
 

No, you don't use chemicals, it's polished mirror clean then heated over an alcohol lamp, I normally place the hand in a metal measuring spoon filled about half way with brass shavings to distribute the heat more evenly. Old school. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, you don't use chemicals, it's polished mirror clean then heated over an alcohol lamp, I normally place the hand in a metal measuring spoon filled about half way with brass shavings to distribute the heat more evenly. Old school. 
Very nice job beautifully done [emoji16]

Sent from my SM-T585 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I recently ran up on the same problem with the winding clutch and pinions, this time on a 16s. I deliberately left them out of the cleaner and did them by hand and ended up with the same sticking problem. This time I ended up cleaning all the teeth again and lightly oiling with a small drop of sewing machine oil and voila, no more sticking and a nice, smooth action. One more lesson learned. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The best and almost only way to achieve the magical £ 4.04 individual watch cost is via the loophole ploy of job lot buys Ross. Dividing down the outlay by the number of watches purchased. I've managed it many times in the past, this then gives you the extra edge of choosing any watch from that lot. Maybe we should have an all time winner, whos prepared to troll  through the last four years of posts and pick some worthy contenders. Unfortunately i have a poorly shoulder so i cant raise my right hand and my left shoulder is out in sympathy for my right shoulder. Put your right hand up if you think i talk a load of bull 💩     🖐
    • Ah but, will you count DIY versions.
    • £10.00 is not a huge amount for a watch these days with the increased asking prices. Let’s count ourselves lucky we don’t have this for tools, it would be £404.00 🤪   Tom
    • I have the perfect solution for this, i just dont invite anyone round.
    • @rossjackson01 it's only getting harder and harder to get 'cheap' watches to work on, I have done some reading and depending on the source the prices of vintage watches is increasing somewhere between 10% and 50% a year. The only way I have found to get watches to lay the 404 game with is to buy a bulk lot say 10 with an average price of < £4.04 but even that is getting harder and harder, hence the re-boot. I see that £6.99 is looking like a popular choice - but I ask the members, is £6.99 realistic, can you actually find watches to work on for £6.99 - maybe its better to cut to the chase and jump to £10.10 for example and allow more people to play? Jut a thought.
×
×
  • Create New...