Jump to content

Removing rusty screw from mainplate


YuriyV

Recommended Posts

Very often one or more screws are rusty to impossible safely remove them from the place. Usually apply to bridge and dial screws.
What are recommended measures to remove them without damaging other parts? 
I'd narrow down my question to three typical scenarios:

1. Many parts remain on place including the dial. And other parts, hidden under it;

2. Dial and other parts removed. But MS barrel and/or gears are still under blocked bridge(s );

3. Everything is removed, including all bridges, but some non removable steel parts (like springs) are still on place; 

Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, YuriyV said:

What are recommended measures to remove them without damaging other parts? 

Alum in warm water or a screw extractor, you can use the search box top right to find related discussions . However I would first apply some penetrating oil and try to unscrew first, even if that shears the head, because there will be less material to dissolve, and you can remove the other parts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a sidebar, alum in boiler water is an old trick to remove a broken tap if its broken in AL or a copper alloy (non ferrous).  After a few hours it turns the tap into sludge. 

Boiling and hours is a lot harsher treatment than JDM recommends, so a shorter soak might be just the thing to eat up enough of the expanded iron oxide to free things up. 

The point though is alum can dissolves steel quite effectively so try to keep other bits of ferrous out of the mix and if they have to be there, don't leave it on the stove overnight with other bit of ferrous metal still attached :) 

Edited by measuretwice
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://watchguy.co.uk/cgi-bin/files?showfile=Venus/Venus 178.pdf&filename=Venus 178.pdf&dir=Technical Manuals&action=documents   The hour recorder is driven by the barrel and it will only stop if it is held by the hour recorder stop lever 8690. So I would check if this lever (powered by the spring 8691) is really holding the hour recorder in the "chrono off status". I haven't worked on a Venus 178 so far, but on an Omega 861 I chose 9501 grease for the friction spring as it's moving very slow at quite high tension.
    • All I do is use a fine marker (sharpie) to put the service date on the back cover, this way it can be removed with some IPA and does no permanent damage to the watch. I'm in two minds about the whole service marking thing, sometimes it's good/bad to see the markings on the watch case back as you know it's been worked on and vice versa. However, if I took my car in for a service and the mechanic scratched some code into the housing of my engine I wouldn't be too impressed. Hence, I think my sharpie solution is a reasonable compromise.
    • hmmmm.... maybe there is a way to skin that cat 🙀 let me think on it... unless anyone else has any ideas? I left the opening in the side of the base and ring quite large to maybe allow you to grip the crown, but appreciate this may not always be possible, especially for small movements where the crown will not extend past the outer wall of the holder. I noticed this also, but after using the holder for a while I noticed that the ring/holder began to wear into shape (rough edges/bumps worn off) and the size became closer to the desired movement OD. Maybe with some trial and error we could add 0.5 mm (??) to the movement OD to allow for this initial bedding-in?
    • Hi nickelsilver, thanks for the great explanation and the links! I'll take a good look in the article.  Especially this is great news to hear! Looking through forums and youtube videos I was informed to 'fist find a case and then fit a movement for it'. But seems that's not the case for pocket watches at least?  I guess I should be looking to find some 'male square bench keys' for now. I was thinking of winding the mainspring using a screwdriver directly, but I found a thread that you've replied on, saying that it could damage the spring. 
    • Murks, The rate and amplitude look OK, and the amplitude should improve once the oils you have used get a chance to move bed-in, also I notice that you are using default 52 degrees for the lift angle, if you get the real lift angle (assuming it's not actually 52) this will change your amplitude - maybe higher, maybe lower. I notice that the beat error is a little high, but not crazy high. At the risk of upsetting the purists, if the balance has an adjustment arm I would go ahead and try and get this <0.3 ms, but if it does not have an adjustable arm then I would probably leave well alone. Just my opinion.
×
×
  • Create New...