Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Yep, despite everyone who's ever worked on a watch telling me to be careful, I still managed to strip a thread in a watch currently undergoing servicing, and yes, it was indeed a left hand thread. I'm stymied as to how to effect a repair on this as my miniature tap and die set doesn't include a left hand tap of any size, let alone the one I actually need.

Any advice that works will be most appreciated and is worth at least one beer, or even a case of beer if it works really well and is fairly easy to do.

Yours in embarrassment - Roger from Edmonton. 

Posted

Even if you could find a correct tap, the damage is done, material won't go back. At this point either you keep it as it is, maybe try a tiny piece of wire or foil to improve grip. You could try threading and fitting a larger screw, but for a beginner even that is easier said than done, 

Posted

As JDM posts out a difficult repair. Either re-tap to accommodate  a larger threaded screw or drill & fit a bushing & re-thread the bushing. The easiest way would be to find a donor moment. PS what is the movement.

Posted (edited)

If your name is George Daniels, you would doubtless make a new part... but in your case a drill and bush may be more appropriate. If you have time and a sense of humour then Daniels describes how to make yourself a left hand tap. It strikes me that you could skip the step of making a die and then a proper LH tap for a one-off repair:

E2E95A7B-552E-4129-8F07-C6000778BB65.thumb.jpeg.3554cd14ca46db382d92e843b5c8ca09.jpeg

Alternatively, if the screw you need is readily available you could buy a replacement to grind as described above to make a tap.

Edited by StuartBaker104
Posted

You could also make a tap using a left handed screw of the correct width and preferably slightly longer than the screw to be fitted (I presume this is for a crown wheel?). 

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yes, the specific old tools do exist, but may be having one is not needed as they are not cheap, and also You will be able to do without it well enough. My advice will be to use regular depthing tool and adjust it for the exact distance between pallet fork and escape wheel bearings from the watch. Then remove the shellac from the pallet that now doesn't pass the ew teeth and move this pallet in. Then put the pallet fork and ew on the depthing tool and check how they lock. They should not lock when the pallet is in, but You will little by little move the pallet out and locking will appear. Then move just an idea out for reliable work and apply shellac, then check if things are still the same. You have to observe where the teeth fall on the pallets - it must be just a little below the edge between impulse and rest planes. Then You must check how everything behaves in the movement This Potence tool is so ingenious, but actually, the traditional way to do the things is much more simple. Arrange the parts not on the pillar plate, but on the cover plate. Only the central wheel will remain on the pillar plate, secured by the cannon pinion.
    • There is a tool that was made for setting up and adjusting escapements of full plate watches.  There were two styles, the picture below shows both of them.  The lower tool held a movement plate and the vertical pointed rods were adjusted to hold the unsupported pivots of the lever and escape wheel.  There was also a version of this tool that had 3 adjustable safety centres so that the balance pivot could be supported by the tool :  The other version I’m aware of is the Boynton’s Escapement Matching and Examining Tool came as a set of two or three clamps that gripped the watch plate and held the safety centres for the pivots : These do turn up on eBay from time to time.  For some escapement work, you can set up the parts in a regular depthing tool, with the centres set according to the distance between the corresponding pivot holes on the movement.  I hope this helps, Mark
    • Once you are aware of the problem, you can adjust as necessary. I have a couple of the Omega 10xx, and they are not my favourites. They seem a bit flimsy and not as solid as previous generation Omega. But I think that's true of a lot of movements from the 70-80s. For me, the 50-60s is the peak in watch movements, where the design criteria was quality, not saving the last penny.
    • Thanks for this post MikePilk, I just came across a similar problem with an Omega 1022.  The problem I had was the seconds pinion spring was bent out of shape and did not even engage with the wheel properly, so the seconds hand was not moving at all. (no power loss though :) I removed the automatic module so I could access the spring and work on it. Once I bent it back close to the right shape, I experienced the same problem you reported about power loss.  Many tweaks later, and the seconds hand is moving properly again, with amplitude back to good numbers again. Cheers
×
×
  • Create New...