Jump to content

Moebius 9034/2 or Moebius 9000/2 ?


Tmuir

Recommended Posts

There are lots of threads about which oil to use on mechanical watches, but not many on the discussion for quartz watches.

I don't plan to do too many quartz watches, so would prefer to only buy one quartz watch oil. (if possible)

The ETA955.112 technical sheet recommends Moebius Synthetic 9034/2, but then we have Moebius 9000/2 which is specifically made for quartz watches.

If I was to only buy one which one would you recommend?

9000 is fine with plastics but I don't know about 9034, I also see the two oils have different viscosity too, and I think the 9034 being the lighter (finer) oil

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To add to the confusion if you look at the newest tech sheet for ETA955.112 They have another oil 9014. Then I have noticed that the 9000 quartz oil doesn't always appear in the tech sheets for lubricating quartz watches?

The problem with horological lubrication is to try to find anything that resembles meaningful specifications that we can use. So 9014 has a viscosity of 98cts 20°C. Not the best for plastics it is a is a mix of 70% of 9010 and 30% of 9030. 9034 specifically labeled for plastic at low temperatures has a very low viscosity of 60cts 20°C. The concern I would have with really low viscosity oils is usually recommend surface treatment to keep the oil from spreading adding to your cost. Then 9000 has a viscosity of 100 cSt at 20°C and is specifically designed for quartz watches.

So I have used the 9000 it does work really nicely on quartz watches.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I will just go with 9000.

My other hobby is toy and model steam engines and if you want to start a lively discussion there you ask whether you prefer to use distilled water in your engines, or deionised water.

I think 'which oil is the best' would be the equivalent question in horology to get a wide and varied discussion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

I'm doing my very first quartz watch movement, an ETA 955.112 (my old fathers). ETA's latest technical communication specifies 9014 for the jewel pivot holes. Now, I don't plan to service many quartz watches so I'm a bit reluctant to make the "investment". Just how bad would it be to use for example 9010 instead? I certainly wouldn't want to ruin anything, physically or the time keeping. I also have HP-1300 and thicker oils/lubricants.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

M9010 is 150cst @20c. nearest other than M9000 and M9104, is M941 (for pallet stones) at 105 cst @ 20c but this is an ester not a mineral/PAO (synthetic mineral oil), so not sure of effects on plastic parts.  Like you I don't use a lot so didn't want the expense of M9000 for one or 2 watches.  I have used M9010 without trouble on an ETA 955.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, canthus said:

M9010 is 150cst @20c. nearest other than M9000 and M9104, is M941 (for pallet stones) at 105 cst @ 20c but this is an ester not a mineral/PAO (synthetic mineral oil), so not sure of effects on plastic parts.  Like you I don't use a lot so didn't want the expense of M9000 for one or 2 watches.  I have used M9010 without trouble on an ETA 955.

Good to know and thanks for your reply! I think (but except for the experience made by you I'm guessing) that a possible (only) downside would be a shortened battery life? Anyway, if anyone can refute och confirm I'd appreciate the education. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is another simple way to look at the lubrication problem.  You're supposed to be running a series of electrical checks to verify the watch is functioning correctly. So two tests that would be affected by increased friction are the current consumption Less than or equal to 1,20 μA. Then there is the low-voltage check both of these are not going to work properly if you have too much friction or if something else is wrong.

_c_t_ct_955112_fde_491181_10.pdf

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/30/2017 at 9:40 AM, Tmuir said:

I think I will just go with 9000.

My other hobby is toy and model steam engines and if you want to start a lively discussion there you ask whether you prefer to use distilled water in your engines, or deionised water.

I think 'which oil is the best' would be the equivalent question in horology to get a wide and varied discussion.

I vote for anything  that  comes out of a distillery. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, I am about 5 months into watchmaking and I love it!   The attention to precise detail is what really attracts me to it. (and the tools!) I am working on a 16 jewel 43mm pocket watch movement.   There are no markings besides a serial number (122248) .  The balance staff needs replacement. The roller side pivot broke off.  I successfully removed the hairspring using Bergeon 5430's.  I successfully removed the roller using Bergeon 2810.   Did i mention I love the tools?! I removed the staff from the balance wheel using a vintage K&D staff removal tool  with my Bergeon 15285 (that's the one that comes with a micrometer adjustment so it can be used as a jewel press as well as a traditional staking tool...it's sooooo cool...sorry..  can you tell i love the tools?) No more digressing..  I measured the damaged staff in all the relevant areas but I have to estimate on some because one of the pivots is missing. A = Full length  A= 4.80mm  (that's without the one pivot...if you assume that the missing pivot is the same length as the other pivot (I'm sure it's not)  then A = 5.12 mm...(can I assume 5.00mm here?) F=  Hair spring collet seat  F=  .89mm   (safe to assume .90 here? .. I am sure that my measurement's would at least contain  .01 mm error ?) G = balance wheel seat  G = 1.23 mm  (1.20mm?) H  =  roller staff  H =  .59mm  (.60 mm?) B  = bottom of the wheel to roller pivot   B  = 2.97mm  (3.00 mm?)     here I am estimating  again because this pivot is missing. So my friends, and I thank you profusely,  can you point me in the right direction as to how to proceed? Do i buy individual staffs?  or an assortment?   Since I don't know exactly the name of the manufacturer, will that be a fatal hindrance?   Tbh, I'm not even sure what country of origin this movement is. Thank you!    
    • Thats why i asked that question earlier, what happens if lubrication is placed directly on top of epilame ?  As opposed to walled within its non epilamed area . I'm not saying its right, i have no idea , just asking questions. 
    • thinking of where epilam should be removed did you know there was a patent that covers this? At least for the escapement I'm attaching it. GB1057607A-1 epilame.pdf
    • Back home...printing now.  Will report results
    • Oh well, if Master @nickelsilver says it's the way to go, then it is the way to go! I stand corrected! 🫡 Are there any other places where you're supposed to remove the epilame from the contact point of rubbing? I don't think so! Thanks for the effort @Neverenoughwatches, much appreciated! 🙂👍
×
×
  • Create New...