Jump to content

Omega 1342 trimmer.


Recommended Posts

Hello, everyone,

I have an Omega 1342 watch that I need to adjust the time keeping ability of, using the 

small internal trimmer.

The watch gains about 2 to 3 seconds per week, so I need to know which way the trimmer needs to be adjusted.

Clockwise, or anti clockwise?

Thank you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is almost like a chronometer 2-3 sec a week that is 1,5 minutes a year. I would probably leave hat as is . Adjusting 1342 trimmer is tricky as not just left or right. If you turn to much it could go over to - or + 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was thinking this was such a strange complaint until I realised we weren't talking about a mechanical calibre, but an early quartz, and I'm not exactly sure what the expectation should be with such a movement. I will say many people wear mechanical watches that are much much less accurate than that and don't consider it a problem, though. My Seiko for example, according to my timer should gain something like 15 seconds a day, but in reality, I never notice any inaccuracy. 

I remember reading about quartz trimmers in a horology book before. if I remember correctly the results of adjusting it are completely unpredictable, a small nudge one way might add a lot of time, a little time, lose a little time or lose a lot of time, what ever way you turn it. I think you can monitor the effects through oscilloscope somehow, but trial and error would be your only way in all likely-hood. 

Edited by Ishima
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For this job you need a quartz analyzer. The watch should gain 0-15 sec per month not week. When you get an analyzer you can easily adjust a trimmer. I like to adjust them to 2 sec per month if I can.

When adjusting it is like adjusting the beat error in a mechanical watch you have to center it just right or it goes too positive or too negative either way you turn it.

Try to buy the Witschi Tech Handy Two. I have learned that servicing Quartz watches you can't go without one.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That machine is around £2,000. I'm not sure it's a given that everyone should have one.:wacko:



If you want to service Omega's you have to have one by Omega standard. If you don't know how to read your rate, consumption and coil resistance you shouldn't be servicing ETA's and up. Especially trimmer watches.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can see the use for trimmer watches, the necessity, even.

I was just trying to point out the fact that it is £2k (and also really rather large) shouldn't be taken for granted. 

Edited by Ishima
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suppose when considering a quartz movement we are trying to obtain perfection but in reality it's a nonsense. Unless you're engaged in some type of profession that requires complete accuracy such as " Global Navigation" 2 seconds a week or even 20 seconds a week or even per day, is of little consequence to the average person.
I think my old 1984 Omega 1430 gains or loses 5 seconds a week I can't remember. I wouldn't even consider having any adjustments made to it.
I would leave well alone !
Also as Ishima makes reference too " according to my timer should gain something like 15 seconds a day but in reality, I never notice any inaccuracy " Due to variables with a mechanical movement, may even prove to be more accurate than a quartz movement, over an extended period of time, due to the consistent nature of the quartz movement with regards to time gained or lost. In some cases anyway. Now there's a thought.

Sent from my SM-T585 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My "thanks" to everyone that contributed to my question about adjusting the Omega 1342 trimmer.

For me, the Witschi timer is but a dream.

So it will have to be a case of small adjustments, lots of patience and making notes.

Regards.

Len.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Len33 said:

So it will have to be a case of small adjustments, lots of patience and making notes.

I wish you well Len.  I believe the trimmer can regulates +/- 1.2 seconds per day, please don't go mad in the process of seeking perfection! :unsure:

Edited by Geo
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello, Rogart63!

I don't know the answer to that.

All I do know, is that it is an 'in house' Omega movement and no other ETA movement will fit the case.

Out of interest, what difference would it make if the Omega 1342 is/was thermocompensated?

Regards.

Len.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we use the rub-off epilame method of pallet stones (run dry for a few minutes before applying the epilame) where will the oil go/be transported when it is pushed away from the impulse surface by the escape wheel teeth? Onto the epilame-treated sections of the pallet! Once the oil has been applied/transported to the epilame-treated sections of the pallet where will it then go? Nowhere as the oil will remain on the epilame. So, perhaps the run-dry method defeats its intended purpose leaving the pallet impulse surfaces dry!? If, on the other hand, we do not remove the epilame from the pallet stones where the escape wheel teeth come in contact with them I'd expect more oil to remain where we want it and need it. Yes, I agree, that is the question, and my gut feeling tells me that is exactly the case. Epilame was created to have an adhesive trait and the oleophobic property is just a side effect.  
    • Might that be the viscous nature of oil resisting gravity H  ,  we have been comparing water and hydrophobic surfaces which are similar in principle but water is much less viscous than oil. I guess what we trying to discover is if epilame also has an adhesive trait as well as being oleophobic. Plus the oil dropet has very little mass for gravity to work on, like watching tiny water beads that can grip onto vertical glass until they are connected together to increase their mass then run down. Gravity isn't the only factor at play when oil is placed on pallet stones. The oil receives a lot of bashing that may push it out of position ? Thinking about it if the oil stays in position for 10 minutes enough time for the escape wheel to scrape off the epilame , then  a walled in lubrication has been achieved,  the epilame is no longer beneath the oil ( possibly mixed into the oil )
    • But it also makes it seem less susceptible to gravity. If you place a droplet of oil on an epilame-treated surface the droplet of oil will still stay in place even if you then flip the surface from a horizontal to a vertical position. That is, the oil droplet remains anchored, and that's the purpose of epilame. If it was just a matter of creating an oleophobic surface we could probably use other, less expensive, methods!? I don't know @Waggy but my gut feeling tells me you're spot on (pun intended!). I believe the oleophobic property is a side effect of epilame which is designed to keep the oil anchored.
    • Saturday morning 27/4 Sunday evening 28/4 Monday evening 29/4 Floor has a drain in the middle so I am hoping that there is very little fall on it, if any. Room is about 2.5 x 2.5 metres square. Can only use about 1/2 of one wall on the right of the pictures which has a sliding glass door in it. And only about 3/4 of the wall to the left of the pictures as it has the door to the house in it. Progress. 🙂 
    • This makes much more sense now, the oil is withdrawing itself to make as little contact with the epilame as possible. Same principle as wax on a car creates a hyrophobic surface that makes the cohesive properties of water molecules pull together.  The water beads run off only when under the influence of gravity but still remain cohesively beaded up. And as mentioned earlier a pivot would keep the oil in place on a cap jewel.  Epilame on an escapement would be a different scenario, there is nothing to hold the oil in position if gravity tugs at the bead to move, plus the escape teeth pull the oil about Maybe this is why its suggested to run the watch for a short while to remove the epilame to make two oleophobic surfaces either side of the oil, creating a ring of fire 🔥 around it 😅 The oil is repelled by every surface of the epilame even that which it sits upon. So the oil pulls together to make as little contact with it as possible, but the oil cant float above that area, it can only sit there on top of it. Under gravity the oil could potentially run away as an oil bead, unless the epilame has an adhesive property which i dont think it does ? So something else keeps it in position ie a pivot under a cap jewel . But that isn't the case in a pallet jewel situation. 
×
×
  • Create New...