Jump to content

Seiko partial service (not a question)


Recommended Posts

I'm seeing more and more of these, 6R15s almost new which exhibit a poor pattern or performance. This one, manuf. Apr. '14 was spinning 210 deg. face up, dropping to about 170 in other positions. What I do in these cases is let them wind down (to avoid removing the auto bridge), remove balance jewels, balance and pallet fork. Leave these parts 5 minutes in rectified gasoline (got in 1L bottle from an otherwise useless local supplier), applied 9010 to the stones, and put it back together. Takes less than 30 minutes. Picture taken before regulation.

P5210689.JPG.9c5284e56c26a5dd30bbb54955dd77ab.JPG

Edited by jdm
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very interesting. Thank you for sharing.

Im not sure of the specs for the modern seikos as all my experience is based on 6139 and 6138. The amplitude on those appears to be lower than expected in general, which is something most watchmakers now expect and tolerate.

What does jump in what you're saying is the significant drop to 170 in VPs. My young experience would have me worry about endshakes or pivot/jewel issues.

So, after cleaning and oiling the amps remained reasonable?

Thanks again for sharing.

Happy Sunday!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

So, after cleaning and oiling the amps remained reasonable?

Yes, as in picture.

 

pallet fork stones left unlubricated, or?

As mentioned: "remove balance jewels, balance and pallet fork. Applied 9010 to the (related) stones". Nothing else.

Edited by jdm
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not too familiar with these watches as (1) I live mostly in 'banger' territory! (2) I dislike the 'square' anti-shock springs and (3)The finishing is unpleasant to my eye.

Nonetheless they seem to have good reviews and I'm surprised that they need attention at such a young age! Where are these made? In Singapore?

Anil

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Not too familiar with these watches as (1) I live mostly in 'banger' territory!

Not sure what do you mean by that. 6R15 based Seiko cost easily $500 and their owners usually take good care of them.

 

2) I dislike the 'square' anti-shock springs

Actually the Seiko Diashock system is one of the best ever made, with possibly millions of units produced. Easy to work with and highly effective.

 

 (3)The finishing is unpleasant to my eye.

Finishing is simple but very nice. Cotes de Tokio on the rotor,  beveled balance cock, and few more details.

P5230692.thumb.JPG.859808d6b8e7abb11f13ebc0a367c5b3.JPG

 

 

Where are these made? In Singapore?

Made in Japan. The 6R15 is primarily a mov.t for JDM watches.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

As mentioned: "remove balance jewels, balance and pallet fork. Applied 9010 to the (related) stones". Nothing else.

Sorry, still confused, you said you soaked the parts in a gasoline, so if the same is true of the pallet fork, then no oil will remain on that (and at least theoretically there wont be any on the escape wheel) and I've not heard of a pallet fork/escape wheel being lubricated with 9010. Can you clarify?

I'd be interested to know that it apparently runs well afterwards, in either case, since seiko service sheets typically instruct lubricating the exit and entrance stone. 

Edited by Ishima
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Sorry, still confused, you said you soaked the parts in a gasoline, so if the same is true of the pallet fork, then no oil will remain on that (and at least theoretically there wont be any on the escape wheel) and I've not heard of the pallet fork/escape wheel being lubricated with 9010. Can you clarify?

As asked and answered before already: I do lubricate the stones of the pallet fork with with a very small amount of 9010, which is what Seiko recommends, they call it "Moebius A". Attached service sheet.

6R15B.pdf

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi JDM,

by living in 'banger' territory I meant that I usually work with beat-up 6119s, 7006/9s, 6309 and sometimes 7s26/36. As you rightly said, these (6rxx and similar) watches are priced higher and the owners would send them to the Seiko agent for attention. It will take a while for them to get to the stage where I can get my grubby hands on them!

I dont have an issue with the diashock system but more with the square springs that started with the 7S26. The older 3 pointed ones I can get back in place with a rusty nail but the square ones are a pain, especially the smaller ones on the train wheels.

WRT to the finishing, well the pic you posted of the balance wheel cock says it all. Is it acceptable?..yes in the sense that it doesn't affect the efficiency of the watch which works extremely well. But I prefer the finishing of the older movements. Additionally the pressed in posts which Seiko started using in the 7s26 really bugs me.

It comes down to personal preference.

cheers

Anilv

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I dont have an issue with the diashock system but more with the square springs that started with the 7S26. The older 3 pointed ones I can get back in place with a rusty nail but the square ones are a pain, especially the smaller ones on the train wheels.

I hear this complain a lot, but honestly I find these spring quite easy to deal with.

For the balance ones there is two methods, first the "tweezers only" one where you keep a thin finger of rodico over it and use the tweezers to put it in place. This methods require moderate manual skills, so I decided to document the other, which is even easier.

File a pegwood to the shape below. If you don't have pegwood, use a toothpick, brochette stick, or anything like that. The outer diameter must just go inside the jewel setting, then carve the inside with a 1mm drill bit.

P5240003.JPG.1f065d1148ee08e1531f2870108c1837.JPG

The rest is intuitive. Note how the spring is very off-center before applying the stick, but the soft wood easily takes care of that.

And for the small ones in the train t's even simpler, don't bother removing them, wash the plate, oil the related pivots, and enjoy the good results.

 

WRT to the finishing, well the pic you posted of the balance wheel cock says it all. Is it acceptable?..yes in the sense that it doesn't affect the efficiency of the watch which works extremely well. But I prefer the finishing of the older movements. Additionally the pressed in posts which Seiko started using in the 7s26 really bugs me.

I don't really think you can find a better finished mov.t at this price point, except possibly on some Seagull. I don't see anything wrong or ugly in the pressed posts.

Edited by jdm
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • What this extra disk next to the pinion? Thats not part of the assembly 
    • It looks like the canon pinion function is part of this great wheel. The pinion nearest the clip runs the minute wheel on the dual side. The pinion nearest the wheel is driven by a small wheel from under the setting lever cover plate that engages in hand setting position.    So when assembled the crown was driving the whole great train. Does this mean the pinions are too tight? Should I attempt to disassemble this great wheel and lubricants?
    • Picking up this side-tracked post again as I just removed a balance staff of a 1920's Omega (35,5L-T1) I was impressed by the way @Delgetti had his setup when he had to change out a balance-staff (https://www.watchrepairtalk.com/topic/28854-new-balance-staff-not-riveting-to-balance/page/2/#comment-244054 Not only that, but also the idea of removing the seat first before punching the staff out from the seat-side, avoiding the whole discussion of the rivet yes/no enlarging the hole. I didn't have the fancy clamps & tools Delgetti has, so I used my screw-head polishing tool. Initially I used #1500 grit diamond paste on the steel wheel, which kinda worked, but very slow. I changed to #800 grit diamond paste, which worked better, but still slow. Then I glued #240 sanding paper to the steel disk; That worked and the disk was hand-driven. Once close to the balance wheel, I took the sanding paper off and continued with #800 diamond paste. One can only do this when the balance wheel sits true on the staff and has no "wobble". I went on grinding until I saw some diamond paste on the rim of the balance wheel. This was as far as I could grind and it seemed that there wasn't much left of the seat. Carefully, with my staking set, I knocked the staff from the seat-side out. Turns out that the thickness of the seat left, now a small ring, was only 0.1mm. The balance wheel hole is in perfect shape and no damage done to the wheel at all. Of course, if the wheel has a "wobble" or isn't seated true on the balance staff, you can't get as close and there will be more left of the seat. In my case, it worked perfect 🙂 I'm very happy how this method worked out ! 😊  
    • As is tradition, one step forward, two steps back. Got the board populated and soldered into place without any issues.   But no hum. So I started testing the coils with an ohmmeter. I got 5.84k ohms across D1 (from red to red in the picture below), which is as expected. But I'm getting an open circuit for the other drive coil and feedback coil, D2 and F1 (from green to each of the two yellows).   Since the movement was working with my breadboard setup, it implies I somehow broke the connection between the coils and the solder lugs. They're all the way at the bottom of the lugs, but maybe the heat migrated down and broke the connections? I guess it's possible it happened while cleaning the flux off, but I used a soft artist's brush and isopropyl alcohol. I did a lot of high magnification examination, and I don't see any issues, but let me know if you see anything I missed or if you can think of anything else I should check.
×
×
  • Create New...