Jump to content

Accurist movement help


Danh

Recommended Posts

Have you looked under the balance for the I D, my sight is not that good but I think I can see something under the balance. Or take the movement out, remove hands, dial, if nothing there take a photo of the dial side and post, many I D's can be recognized by the setting leaver work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it is a FEF 6664. I say think because these style of movements look very similar to each other. To be certain you need to take measurements of the movement & also take what measurement if you can of the old balance staff. 

http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?00&ranfft&a&2uswk&FEF_6664

 

to do your own research use this

 

http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-2uswk.cgi?1&ranfft

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK getting the balance is the challenge. If the staff is the same as cal. 6600 or 430 then the staff can be purchased from the link below..

I might have one in my own stock.!!!!!

My "bestfit" book does not show the 6664. So I suggest use the measurements shown @ the balancestaffs site for the 430 to see if it is the one required. 

 

http://www.balancestaffs.com/fef.php

 

or

 

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/3-piece-vintage-FEF-6600-Swiss-made-Balance-Staff-For-Watchmaker-265-/262805841601?hash=item3d3072e6c1:g:~pgAAOSwaB5XjdWG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would certainly say that it was part of the same family of movements as the 6664 but there are a number of differences.

The 6664 has a push pin stem release and an adjustable stud carrier. The OP's watch has a screw stem release, a fixed stud carrier, and a completely different set lever bridge/spring. It also has a cut away around the outer edge of the train wheel bridge, although this may simply be cosmetic.

I'm not saying that it definitely isn't a 6664 as it is not uncommon for there to be slight variations within a particular calibre, however, this level of deviation is usually accompanied by a change in designation.

Of course it may make no difference at all in this case as it could well be that the same balance staff is used across the whole movement family, but then again if there are variations in (for instance) beat rate within the movement family, this may also mean variations in balance design and potentially different staffs.

It goes without saying that whatever it turns out to be it needs a non-shock protected staff and not the Incabloc illustrated on Ranfft.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 19/01/2017 at 9:49 PM, Danh said:

Hi All

hope you all well

i am stuck trying to find out who made this movement, I need a new balance staff for It

it measures approx 18mm x 15mm (6.75x7.75?)

21 jewels

thank you

dan 

IMG_7286.JPG

Hi Dan I've got one similar and it's marked eta 2487 if that's any use.

IMG_0150.PNG

regards 

Kaz

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 20/01/2017 at 10:43 PM, oldhippy said:

BUSAKAZ, I know your trying to help, but your movement is nothing like the Accurist, apart from size and shape. Just look at the difference in the plates and wind up mechanism, do you see how different they are.

 

Oldhippy I can obviously see it is different but if it got him out of trouble he could of had the movement for free.:thumbsu:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, BUSAKAZ said:

Oldhippy I can obviously see it is different but if it got him out of trouble he could of had the movement for free.:thumbsu:

Too small I am afraid my friend, but I very much appreciate the thought - very very kind of you

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I would use some binding wire around the part before heating it. It protects the steel from being burned. I know that sounds strange, as you're going to heat it with a blowtorch, but if a part is thin and delicate the steel can literally burn away before your eyes, which isn't funny if you've put hours into the job. I bought some tools steel from Cousins a few years ago which turned out not to be tool steel, because it couldn't be hardened or tempered. I wasn't impressed, as I had spent two hours making the part for it to be useless.
    • Hi that’s what was meant by animal glue “ a glue made from animal products”. Ie bone , skin and other animal residues.  There was a place at Huntington YORK who used to boil down the ingredients. It stunk.   We used it in pellet form in a sort of Bain Marie on a gas ring  it was very good, didn’t think it was around any more with the modern glues, 
    • It's back to the drawing board I'm afraid. As pointed out, the Rodico trick is so fiddly and my pin vice jaws don't close in union. I tried but the screw is so small it's hard to grip the screw in the Rodico without it moving all over the place while trying to get it in the vice. I started to shake too much so gave up before the screw flew off somewhere never to be found again.  I'm now thinking that maybe I could bond the screw on the end of a bit of peg wood and then dissolve the adhesive afterward.  I just had another thought🤔 I have some really small PCB drill bits maybe I could drill a small hole in peg wood and push the screw in, as stated I only need to get the screw started.  Another idea 🤣 Magnetize the screwdriver to hold the screw 🤔 
    • Yeah there is a spring under there. Hopefully now I can source a screw for the click and the bridges! Thanks for your help!
    • Definitely worthwhile, if you are working with old watches - just be sure it's an actual Geiger counter, not one of the vast range of scam/fake "Radiation detectors" on ebay & amazon etc. that detect RF or static electricity...   In the mean time, I'd put the dial and hands in zip bags & wipe down the work area with a damp cloth to pick up any dust, then discard the cloth. The emitted radiation from radium lume is not normally harmful - but inhaling or ingesting a single particle of the material can cause serious long term harm, so do take care with it.  
×
×
  • Create New...