Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi All

hope you all well

i am stuck trying to find out who made this movement, I need a new balance staff for It

it measures approx 18mm x 15mm (6.75x7.75?)

21 jewels

thank you

dan 

IMG_7286.JPG

Posted

Have you looked under the balance for the I D, my sight is not that good but I think I can see something under the balance. Or take the movement out, remove hands, dial, if nothing there take a photo of the dial side and post, many I D's can be recognized by the setting leaver work.

Posted

I think it is a FEF 6664. I say think because these style of movements look very similar to each other. To be certain you need to take measurements of the movement & also take what measurement if you can of the old balance staff. 

http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?00&ranfft&a&2uswk&FEF_6664

 

to do your own research use this

 

http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-2uswk.cgi?1&ranfft

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted

Thank you very much for your help

i promise I did a lot of looking before I posted, but then went "movement blind" in the hope that someone would say "accurist used to use XYZ company"

thank you again for your time

Posted

OK getting the balance is the challenge. If the staff is the same as cal. 6600 or 430 then the staff can be purchased from the link below..

I might have one in my own stock.!!!!!

My "bestfit" book does not show the 6664. So I suggest use the measurements shown @ the balancestaffs site for the 430 to see if it is the one required. 

 

http://www.balancestaffs.com/fef.php

 

or

 

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/3-piece-vintage-FEF-6600-Swiss-made-Balance-Staff-For-Watchmaker-265-/262805841601?hash=item3d3072e6c1:g:~pgAAOSwaB5XjdWG

Posted

You awesome thanks you again, knowing its FEF is a tremendous help, i will dig around and get back if needed

thank you so much

Posted

I would certainly say that it was part of the same family of movements as the 6664 but there are a number of differences.

The 6664 has a push pin stem release and an adjustable stud carrier. The OP's watch has a screw stem release, a fixed stud carrier, and a completely different set lever bridge/spring. It also has a cut away around the outer edge of the train wheel bridge, although this may simply be cosmetic.

I'm not saying that it definitely isn't a 6664 as it is not uncommon for there to be slight variations within a particular calibre, however, this level of deviation is usually accompanied by a change in designation.

Of course it may make no difference at all in this case as it could well be that the same balance staff is used across the whole movement family, but then again if there are variations in (for instance) beat rate within the movement family, this may also mean variations in balance design and potentially different staffs.

It goes without saying that whatever it turns out to be it needs a non-shock protected staff and not the Incabloc illustrated on Ranfft.

  • Like 1
Posted

Good useful info Marc. The only way to be really sure is measure the old balance & see if  the same measurements apply to the 6600/430. 

  • Like 1
Posted

That's a good point, it all depends on tooling costs

i need to replace one at some point - so that point could be now

Posted
On 19/01/2017 at 9:49 PM, Danh said:

Hi All

hope you all well

i am stuck trying to find out who made this movement, I need a new balance staff for It

it measures approx 18mm x 15mm (6.75x7.75?)

21 jewels

thank you

dan 

IMG_7286.JPG

Hi Dan I've got one similar and it's marked eta 2487 if that's any use.

IMG_0150.PNG

regards 

Kaz

Posted

Thanks Kaz

after looking at the tools I don't have to change the balance staff, I may replace the movement with a suitable ETA 

really helpful thanks

Posted

BUSAKAZ, I know your trying to help, but your movement is nothing like the Accurist, apart from size and shape. Just look at the difference in the plates and wind up mechanism, do you see how different they are.

Posted
On 20/01/2017 at 10:43 PM, oldhippy said:

BUSAKAZ, I know your trying to help, but your movement is nothing like the Accurist, apart from size and shape. Just look at the difference in the plates and wind up mechanism, do you see how different they are.

 

Oldhippy I can obviously see it is different but if it got him out of trouble he could of had the movement for free.:thumbsu:

Posted
51 minutes ago, BUSAKAZ said:

Oldhippy I can obviously see it is different but if it got him out of trouble he could of had the movement for free.:thumbsu:

Too small I am afraid my friend, but I very much appreciate the thought - very very kind of you

Posted
2 hours ago, Danh said:

Too small I am afraid my friend, but I very much appreciate the thought - very very kind of you

No problem happy to help.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I believe @nickelsilver has a setup like that.
    • I posted pictures earlier in this thread. My lathe and mill are two separate instruments. I think I have seen examples of putting a milling head on a lathe bed...but not certain.
    • Timex Camper, September 1994, new to me. Strap is an old perlon with "Germany" in script etched into the resin on the tail end. Not Horlon or Eulit I believe. History unknown, running strong, losing less than a minute a day. Goals for this: Wear it a ton! Buy crystal lift, clean out the gunk around the ring and under the crystal Eventually swap into a stainless steel case. I've seen a member who has swapped a Timex mechanical movement into the Timex J.Crew quartz field watch case.
    • One of the problems we would have with a watchmaker's lathe is they were made over considerable span of time and manufacturing in the early days probably wasn't as good as it was today. Then if you look at the older catalogs typically it was just the head a few collets and something to rest graver on. So basically a basic lathe with over time things acquired but acquired things may or may not fit. Order today you purchase a used lathe that all kinds of nifty bits and pieces from a seller that acquired from? This would come back to that the basic watchmaker's lathe was used for basic watchmaking like turning things with a hand graver. Then limited indexing is fine because you can make things like stems Which don't need a whole bunch indexing   In the link above the word vector is mentioned and at the link below you can purchase one. Then of course you're going to need the motor that's a little bit extra for the price. https://www.hswalsh.com/product/lathe-vector-watchmakers-48-collets-hl11. That you're going to need some bonus parts like these found this picture online show the classic way of classic gear cutting.   The lathe could have a much bigger indexing disk but it has to be mounted close to the edge. Otherwise you're going to have a whole bunch of smaller disks like this which I think has notches rather than holes. Then as wonderful as these pictures look actually cutting a gear with this is not entirely fun. Look at all is belts all pulling on things and this is a watchmaker's lathe lightweight with lots of bits and pieces attached. It would make more sense if you actually cut a gear with something like this and it tends to be it's not really the best way to do it looks nice on paper but it is not the best way to go. Reality for cutting watch parts would be a bigger machine is much better. Than getting rid of all those belts and pulleys also good. Here is an interesting channel I would've liked of found a different video but this was nice and short if you look at his video as he uses a stepping motor and worm gear assembly for the indexing plate. In this particular video it gets attached to the lathe at about one minute and seven seconds and it looks like it's hiding looks like he has a Sherline. I do know he's had other stuff you'll just have to go through his videos to find it. Then at about one minute and 22 seconds you find out if you set up things appropriately. It's always bad we end up with half a tooth at the very end. Then you will note big lathe yes he's getting a big gear but you could easily cut a watch gear with the setup. And it definitely way more stable than a watchmaker's lathe.         Oh here's a company they been in business since 1911 http://www.fwderbyshireinc.com/  
    • Hello and welcome from Leeds, England. 
×
×
  • Create New...