Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I've acquired a rather nice Marvin dial, hands and case. I bought this without an accompanying movement and the buyer did not know the movement it came with originally.

The dial size and feet position make me think this must have come from an 11.5''' watch and the big clue is there on the dial that it came from an automatic. If I look on ranfft however then, whilst Marvin have a number of movements attributed to them, there are no automatic movements.

Trying to track down information on 'bought in' movements Marvin used doesn't seem straightforward. I have found a picture of a Marvin automatic '776' movement but no idea what that is based on. Trying to play snap with ranfft it looks very much like an ETA 2783 but that's no joy with the dial feet position.

Any ideas how I can match this up?! Anyone with Marvin experience out there?!

Plan B would be to find a different movement altogether but soldering on new dial feet? ... yikes that's something I don't have the experience of or can justify buying a dial foot soldering machine for! Would be happy to pay for this though if anyone can recommend someone.

MarvinFront.jpg

MarvinBack.jpg

Edited by WatchMaker
Posted

^_^ Oops. Thanks wls1971.

The case back had the original protection Marvin sticker on. I was concentrating so much on the dial I didn't look past that. Having carefully removed the sticker I can see the numbers:

4  538.851

Posted
17 hours ago, WatchMaker said:

I've acquired a rather nice Marvin dial, hands and case. I bought this without an accompanying movement and the buyer did not know the movement it came with originally.

The dial size and feet position make me think this must have come from an 11.5''' watch and the big clue is there on the dial that it came from an automatic. If I look on ranfft however then, whilst Marvin have a number of movements attributed to them, there are no automatic movements.

Trying to track down information on 'bought in' movements Marvin used doesn't seem straightforward. I have found a picture of a Marvin automatic '776' movement but no idea what that is based on. Trying to play snap with ranfft it looks very much like an ETA 2783 but that's no joy with the dial feet position.

Any ideas how I can match this up?! Anyone with Marvin experience out there?!

Plan B would be to find a different movement altogether but soldering on new dial feet? ... yikes that's something I don't have the experience of or can justify buying a dial foot soldering machine for! Would be happy to pay for this though if anyone can recommend someone.

MarvinFront.jpg

MarvinBack.jpg

Can't be a ETA 2783? The dial feet should be sitting at cirkus  2 and 4. 

Posted

I would hazard a guess that an AS 1700/01 movement would fit.

Here's a dial for an AS1700/01 from a Rado Green Horse.. as you can see, one dial foot is slight before 12 (as viewed from the front and the other one is slightly before 6.

Rado dial.jpg

Hope this helps!

Anil

 

  • Like 1
Posted

Hi rogart63 - I agree this is not an ETA 2783. I was just mentioning that the only pictures I'd been able to find of a Marvin automatic, with a movement clearly identified, was of a '776' and this looked like a 2783 but, totally agree, the dial feet preclude this.

BUT

Hi Anil - you absolute star! That's got to be it! I'd given up hope of identifying the movement for the dial and was going for Plan B but I will now be on the hunt for said AS 1700/01 instead. Thank you so much.

[As an aside that Rado dial is interesting; that looks distinctly like a jewel at the 3 o'clock position in your picture!]

Posted

Hi Wayne - Wow! Your detective skills are obviously far superior to mine. I didn't post this forum question without doing quite a bit of looking around myself first but I never came across what you've managed to track down. And that has to be it! Thank you very much. :biggrin:

So Plan A is now to try and seek out a 580C. Plan B if, as I suspect, the 580C is elusive or silly money is to go for hopefully an easier to find AS 1700. A distant Plan C is plucking up the courage to do some feet soldering for a more common 11.5''' movement! [I could use dial glue dots but I'll probably get banned from the forum for even suggesting that ... ! :ph34r: ].

Posted

Hi Watchmaker,

Rado had an unique 'feature' on their automatic watches where the anchor emblem was mounted on a ruby via a central pin which allowed the anchor to rotate...similar to the automatic weight. This additional jewel also meant they could add another jewel to the jewel count.

I think I have a 1700 movement somewhere.. will try to post some pictures of the holes for the dial feet...dial should be there as well.

Looks like the Marvin 580 is a likelier candidate but not much info on the web about this movement so good luck finding one!

Anil

  • Like 1
Posted

I hear you on the "not much info on the web...".

I'll keep a look out for a 580C but I'm not looking to be a purist here; the case and dial are nice enough that if I have a half decent movement in there I'll be happy ... and the 1700 movement would seem to fit the bill. I appreciate your help and advice on that.

Very interesting re. the Rado - I hadn't come across that before but will keep a look out. I gave a wry smile regarding the jewel count as I have in my collection a '57 Jewel' Delbana but think they must have got someone in whose counting skills weren't that good...! :)

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thanks for this post MikePilk, I just came across a similar problem with an Omega 1022.  The problem I had was the seconds pinion spring was bent out of shape and did not even engage with the wheel properly, so the seconds hand was not moving at all. (no power loss though :) I removed the automatic module so I could access the spring and work on it. Once I bent it back close to the right shape, I experienced the same problem you reported about power loss.  Many tweaks later, and the seconds hand is moving properly again, with amplitude back to good numbers again. Cheers
    • After cleaning up the pivots, I made bushes on the lathe. At this point I've pressed in 6 bushes (3 sets) and the wheels turn smooth. What I can also tell you, is that I'm not looking forward to final assembly. Getting the pivots aligned seems to get exponentially more difficult with each wheel that is added.
    • Islands are interesting places to live depending upon their size and other factors. This is a bigger island and it has a bridge to get there at least on one end. It's also big enough that you don't have to go someplace else to get things typically. It can be a problem if you get a job in Seattle though. Yes I've known of people who commuted from the island to Seattle for a job and I don't quite remember how many hours it took but it took a long time. So basically islands are nice if you don't have to leave very often.
    • Thanks @JohnR725! Everything you say makes a lot of sense and is encouraging to read.
    • isn't it nice to have a decent case open or when the case doesn't want to be opened? In the case of a Rolex watch that supposed to pass specific water resistant testing you probably do need to tighten the back down. But they shouldn't be tightened so much that they risk stripping the threads out. Then the other problem that comes up is the gaskets can start to disintegrate and then getting the back off can be quite a challenge unless you have a really good tool and perhaps some penetrating oil to loosen things up. Yes really nice case marking. When I was in school we were taught to mark the cases and  the American watch and clockmakers Institute even had a? So if you joined at one time they would give you an identification number. They were explaining or giving an example of if the watches ever found in you have a unique number they can perhaps figure out the history of the watch or identify the body it's attached to for instance not that that probably comes up that often. So you got a unique number and even made a special metal stamp that you can purchase. It wasn't a super big aggressive stamp but still it left a mark in the back of the case. Then I heard from people at work on Rolex watches they were using a felt pen indelible but later on they decided that was bad because apparently the ink could release  chemicals although it seems like once it's dry that shouldn't be an issue. Then of course today was nice is you can keep computer records sealed have to mark anything at all I personally find it's best to leave no reference behind that you were even there. Especially when you have a beautiful watch that has no markings at all and now it has your scribbling all over it not good typically if there is a typical and watch repair?  a lot of minor repairs you don't need to do a complete servicing. But beyond a certain point you're going to have to take apart a lot of stuff you're going to disrupt the lubrication even if it looks perfect right now and yes you might as well just go ahead the service the whole thing. also in a watch like this where a lot of things seem to be going on the complete service would be better then you'll know exactly where you stand versus dealing with unknown mysteries for prior repair.
×
×
  • Create New...