Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
 

 

 

At a recent BHI meeting my worst fears were not only confirmed but increased with the news

that the company “The Swatchgroup Limited” will no longer be suppling watch parts to supply houses such as Cousins as from 2015. It was also confirmed that its subsidiary company ETA will also be following suit by not supplying movements or movement parts to supply houses. The knock on effect of this throughout the industry should not be underestimated.

 

The worry for all Holologists is companies such as “The Swatchgroup Limited” not only supply watch movements for over 20 makes of watches but also own companies that manufacture rubies, balances wheels, balance springs and they also own “Renata” (battery producer).  With some horological supply companies losing as much as 50% of their trade, it is not an exaggeration to say that some may not survive.  

 

It is my understanding that only selected watch repair companies who comply to specific standards and have specific test equipment will be supplied with replacement parts. For some well established repair companies this may not seem a huge transition. But as always, exclusivity always carries extra costs and restrictions of trade.

 

For hobbyists watch enthusiasts or even any small watch repair companies who willingly tackle the lower grade of watches they will no longer be able to offer a comprehensive service. Apart from success from surfing the net and scrolling through eBay for used parts, thousands of watches will now be sent to the steampunk scrape heap.

 

The reason for this decision is hard to explain as no official communication to the industry has yet been issued. 

It certainly is not for financial reasons “the Swatchgroup limited” reported for year 2012-2013 an increase of sales of 8.3% with a net profit of 1.9 billion Swiss francs (£ 1.3 billion). Worldwide sales of watches has also been remarkable with a steady growth since 2009 to 2012. Total sales of watches year 2012 worldwide was worth  over $7 billion. 

The decision may be an attempt to protect the brands through exclusivity. Whatever the reason or reasons for an industry that somehow survived the quartz era of the 70,s and is now in fine health I find it a very strange decision. The most important person being ignored is existing and future customers.

 

 

 

For those who have doubts about this and the dangers for the industry have a look at these web sites.


 


 

Regards

Derek Ashenden

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted

ya its a real sad turn of events, I've been really escalating my watch repair business & this news is painful to say the least! I think whilst it may take a few months/years for the industry to re-adjust I've no doubt it will.

Posted

The reason I used the automobile industry as an example is the manufacturers of cars tried a very similar policy by not honouring car warranties without branded parts being fitted and these branded parts increased in cost. This policy failed and backfired dramatically with independent garages fitting pattern parts (many made in Asia) for half the cost of the branded named parts. The industry tried to counter this by propaganda that these parts were of inferior quality but money talks. Pattern parts are now very much part of the industry with Fords, Hyundai etc offering service deals to regain this lost and valuable business.

 

Because a customer is willing to spend £5k + on a watch does not mean he or she is not money wise. In fact quit the opposite applies to luxury goods,

value for money and good customer service still applies. Is £800 for service after 5 years wear real value ??? 

Posted

Is £800 for service after 5 years wear real value ???

Absolutely not, unless it is a one of mega complicated watch by the likes of George Daniels.

Posted

milks,

This is exactly the danger, word spreads like a computer virus and customers with money are not daft.

Hopefully Omega,patek-philippe,rolex etc are taking note before the bubble bursts.

Posted (edited)

It just gets worse. Is this illegal practice?

 

No - it's just the mainstream European watch industry being very stupid. It'll be interesting to see how the market responds. My guess is that there will be opportunities for Asian manufacturers and other, non-Swatch manufacturers to make a killing by replicating essential parts and cocking a snook at Swatch.

 

I can also see movements sold as "for spares or repair" starting to be snapped up for stock...

Edited by WillFly
Posted

From what I've read, it seems that the Swatch Group sees ébauches and other parts being sold to non-Swatch manufacturers as creating competition for their own branded products. Also, by restricting the sale of parts, they're forcing repair work to be carried out in their own authorised repairers, rather than by people like you and me.

 

I suppose, in the long term, if it forces other, non-Swatch makers to concentrate on creating their own movements - and there are other Swiss ébauches makers who are not part of Swatch - it might have some value. The worrying part is that around 90% of balances are made by Nivarox - who are owned by Swatch!

 

Might be worth laying in a stock of ETA movements, or even Asian ETA movements -  and creating your own watches...

Posted

The more I read about this the more depressed I am getting. I have been gradually building my collection of watch repair tools (being on a limited budget) i.e only last  I week purchased a lovely Seitz jeweling tool with all the pushers & reamers etc.

Am I just wasting my money now?

This is a hobby & small income generator for me & I really hope this is not going to disappear as I really enjoy my time in my watch/clock room. Is it time for the NAWCC & the BHI to get involved before this lovely craft disappears to only the wealthy few.

Posted

The more I read about this the more depressed I am getting. I have been gradually building my collection of watch repair tools (being on a limited budget) i.e only last  I week purchased a lovely Seitz jeweling tool with all the pushers & reamers etc.

Am I just wasting my money now?

This is a hobby & small income generator for me & I really hope this is not going to disappear as I really enjoy my time in my watch/clock room. Is it time for the NAWCC & the BHI to get involved before this lovely craft disappears to only the wealthy few.

 

Hi clockboy,

 

I've been thinking exactly the same !  in fact I couldn't have written your post any differently for myself  !

 

I wonder how many others feel the same ?   :unsure:

 

Phil.

Posted

Rolex parts have been restricted for many many years. But this is a blow for sure. 

 

I personally have no interest in aligning myself with a particular brand, e.g. Rolex accreditation - or Breitling. But the worry is the potential magnitude of this problem as most of the watches I work on (must be 99%) are using swatch group movements.

 

There are some good replica movements out there and maybe they will get better. But thats not to be relied on.

 

At the moment its getting very hard to find certain parts for vintage calibre chronographs, but I still take them on and I often end up sourcing parts from Australia, USA, Netherlands etc. etc.. this is how it will be if parts for 7750's and 2824's and 2892's etc dry up. These calibres have been around for years and years and so there is an abundance of stock to be had and from a selfish point of view I hope there will be until I retire.

 

The real problem is with new calibres where there has never been parts issued - thats where watch repairers will have to refuse to take on the work IMO.

 

And the Swatch Group - if they were not in Switzerland would this be legal, I think not!

  • Like 1
Posted

I've contacted the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission about this obvious push to monopolize the repair market.  These guys have teeth and the power of Government behind them.  For example: manufacturers can not sell a region fixed DVD player in Australia because of the ACCC stepping in and stopping them.  They took my phone call very seriously and said they will look into it, and if there is anti-competitive behavior happening that it would be address.

 

Furthermore I phone and then wrote letters to 2 members of parliament concerning this as well.

 

When I hear more I'll post more ...

Posted

Who knows, this could be the kickstart the Britsh watchmaking industry needs.......10 -15 years from now we could be talking about eta movement watches in the same vien as seiko. On the other hand, replica parts made in the far east will find there way to market at a fraction of the price for the small independent to repair it. They don't own your watch after you've bought it!.

Posted

its certainly one of those conversations that will go round & round & round. but ultimately theses two many people earning a living out of watch servicing for it to have a dramatic effect. solutions will be found.

Posted

I suspect that (a) the small minority who bother to get their watch serviced will spend more to take it to an authorised dealer, (b) everyone else will put their watch in a drawer and buy a new one, and © either used movements for parts will get very expensive, or (d) the mechanical watch revival, brief though it was, will finally die...and Swatch STILL won't lose out. Depressing for the folks who appreciate the beauty of a mechanical movement but aren't millionaires.... Sigh...

Posted

The only way to resolve this issue is to name & shame. TV programes such as "watch dog" could be interested and even if "the swatch group" put up a valiant argument the seeds of doubt will be set with the public domain.

Posted

The only way to resolve this issue is to name & shame. TV programes such as "watch dog" could be interested and even if "the swatch group" put up a valiant argument the seeds of doubt will be set with the public domain.

 

From what I've read, the whole matter was investigated by the Swiss equivalent of the Monopolies Commission and, after much discussion, they allowed the Swatch Group to go ahead with their plan. Basically, it eliminates competition from those non-Swatch companies who use Swatch-produced ebauches for their movements. They'll either have to tool up elsewhere or go under. It's a protective move for the Swatch Group's profits.

 

Whether it works in the long term is something we'll have to see but, given it's a private move by an industrial group which is not in the EEC, there's sod all you or I or anyone can do about it.

  • 2 years later...
Posted

A terrible state of affairs.  I am now turning away the majority of eta repair work due to unavailability of parts.  Almost all the top end repair work  has now disappeared.   The trade should be petitioning the government to ban the import of all eta product if the parts are not going to be made available the trade as a whole.  

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • After another long hiatus (while waiting for truing calipers to arrive), I’ve made some more progress. TRUING IN THE FLAT I was able to use the calipers I purchased to true the wheel in the flat. There’s still a very slight eccentricity in the round, but I’m going to leave it as is. It doesn’t wobble any more and I’m happy with that. Thanks for the tool recommendation @mbwatch. It worked well, though I must say it takes a delicate touch to get the balance between the calipers. Also, my calipers effectively have four different variations based on the orientation of the arms (2 sides, 2 orientations each). Some are more tapered than others, though to what end, I can’t quite tell. My first thought was that flipping them over yields arms that can be used for poising. They are K&D horizontal calipers, btw. OSCILLATION TEST @nevenbekriev @JohnR725 After truing the wheel in the flat, I carefully remounted the hairspring and did your oscillation test. Balance wheel mounted to balance cock, no pallet fork, rotate balance wheel 180 degrees, let it go, and time+count the oscillations. Results as follows for dial down orientation: Duration: 1m 15sec (to full stop) # of oscillations: About 125, though the amplitude of the oscillations decreased significantly, as one might expect I should redo the test in at least two other orientations…Forgot to do that. 🙂  In general, it’s safe to say this watch has a pretty low amplitude, likely for a variety of reasons. I haven’t oiled the balance jewels FWIW…I should probably do that, but I really don’t want to keep disassembling and reassembling the balance. Is it possible to oil those jewels (top and bottom) by just removing the capstones and putting in a tiny amount of oil, with balance in place? I can see how having the pivot in the jewel hole could change how capillary action works, and thus might pull more oil in than desired. However, those capillary forces will be in effect anyway once the balance is inserted. PRACTICE MOVEMENTS @JohnR725 I agree with your sentiment about using practice movements wholeheartedly, and I’ve done that to some degree. The watch I’m currently repairing is for a friend, and she was willing to have me treat it as a “learn-by-doing experience.” With that said,, I probably should have purchased a few more “beaters” before getting to something where I don’t want to muck things up. I’ve still got a couple of those on the bench that I used as donors, and I’ll try to rehabilitate them.
    • Hi, this is the first place I found when looking for advice so I hope someone could advise me.  Im completely new to touching watches but I’ve always wondered how they work.  I’ve bought a cheap movement, an ETA replica to take apart and rebuild.  Im thinking I’ll need some screwdrivers, tweezers, movement holder and a loop? My goal is just to have a go first and see if I enjoy it enough before buying more tools.  Do I buy cheap tools for now and get better quality tools later if I enjoy it like I think I will? or will the cheap tools be a pain and take some of the fun out of it?  With quality tools being relatively expensive I’m unsure what to buy.    Any advice would be greatly appreciated!
    • Yeah I have seen 44-56 documented for Elgin 18 size elsewhere. I have the style of gauge that's like a set of feeler gauges and I never noticed before today it is faintly stamped "Elgin". Pictured is the way I have been measuring. I am going to go to a larger jewel than the 42 that had been in there. I recently won an auction on a big set of Fitrite jewels all in the little bottles, to discover that the what's actually in the bottles bears no relation to the chart of sizes printed on the box. In most cases it seems to be all mixed so in fact I have about 24 little bottles and thousands of assorted jewels of all diameters and lengths, which is better than nothing. But since I don't have a micrometer with a table, measuring for the exact diameter will be a big job. Instead I will test a lot of them in the fork slot the same way I measure with the gauge. But this is still the next thing. I have to get the escapement to unlock first.
    • it would be nice to have the exact model of the watch the or a picture so we can see exactly what you're talking about. this is because the definition of Swiss watch could be a variety of things and it be helpful if we could see exactly the watch your dealing with then in professional watch repair at least some professionals they do pre-cleaned watches. In other words the hands and dial come off and the entire movement assembled goes through a cleaning machine sometimes I think a shorter bath perhaps so everything is nice and clean for disassembly makes it easier to look for problems. Then other professionals don't like pre-cleaning because it basically obliterates the scene of the crime. Especially when dealing with vintage watches where you're looking for metal filings and problems that may visually go away with cleaning. Then usually super sticky lubrication isn't really a problem for disassembly and typically shouldn't be a problem on a pallet fork bridge because there shouldn't be any lubrication on the bridge at all as you typically do not oil the pallet fork pivots.  
    • A few things you should find out before you can mske a decision of what to do. As Richard said, what is the crown and all of the crown components made of . Then also the stem .  The crown looks to have a steel washer that retains a gasket. So be careful with what chemicals you use to dissolve any stem adhesives or the use of heat. You might swell or melt the gasket unless you are prepared to change that also . The steel washer maybe reactive to alum. Something I've just used to dissolve a broken screw from a plate. First drilled out the centre of the screw with a 0.5mm carbide . Dipped only the section that held the broken screw in Rustins rust remover. This is 40 % phosphoric acid. 3 days and the screw remains were completely dissolved, no trace of steel in the brass threads. A black puddle left in the solution.
×
×
  • Create New...