Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Further to my recent request for any info re the assembly of a Breitling 800 case.  I have not seen one of these before (Even after 47 years in the business!)  I have included a couple of pics.One with bezel off & another in situ. Logic dictates there should be a bezel retaining spring between the bezel & the case but the bezel has no  recess on the inside edge for a spring to sit.  I have scratched my head for a while over this.  Any advice welcome.  

 

 

 

.P1010033.JPGP1010032.JPG

Posted

My guess would be that the movement retaining ring that sits between the case and movement acts as the bezel retaining spring there appears to be a section cut out of it near the winding crown this would allow the retaining ring to give a little as the bezel is pressed home and grip the bezel.

Posted

I believe there should be a retaining spring that sits under the lip of the case itself and the bezel is simply seated over it.

I serviced a '64 Navitimer just this past month that had the bezel spring just under the lip of the case outside the dial.  The spring was round as opposed to the typical octagon shape.  I wish I had taken a better picture of it during assembly but you can just barely see it peaking out from under the lip of the case by the 4 o'clock pusher in this picture.

IMG_1494.JPG

Posted (edited)
8 hours ago, RyMoeller said:

I believe there should be a retaining spring that sits under the lip of the case itself and the bezel is simply seated over it.

I serviced a '64 Navitimer just this past month that had the bezel spring just under the lip of the case outside the dial.  The spring was round as opposed to the typical octagon shape.  I wish I had taken a better picture of it during assembly but you can just barely see it peaking out from under the lip of the case by the 4 o'clock pusher in this picture.

IMG_1494.JPG

The early Navitimers with beads of rice bezel used a retaing ring to hold the bezel in place later models did not.

This site has a good restoration walkthrough and explains the ring with clear photos:

https://superlativetimeblog.wordpress.com/2012/10/04/the-art-of-restoration/

Later Navitimer 806's had friction fit bezels and did not have a retaining ring between case and movement holder I did last night find a site with a description of the various Navitimer bezels and how they fit but I stupidly did not book mark it, I will try and find it again today.

Edited by wls1971
Spelling that would shame a three year old
Posted
52 minutes ago, wls1971 said:

I did last night find a site with a description of the various Navitimer bezels and how they fit but I stupidly did not book mark it, I will try and find it again today.

try your browser history

Posted

No I cant find it but you could join http://breitlingsource.com/ and put in 808 bezel in the search there are some pictures of the 808 with bezel off because this question has been asked before on that site you have to be a member to see the pics on the posts

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • isn't it nice to have a decent case open or when the case doesn't want to be opened? In the case of a Rolex watch that supposed to pass specific water resistant testing you probably do need to tighten the back down. But they shouldn't be tightened so much that they risk stripping the threads out. Then the other problem that comes up is the gaskets can start to disintegrate and then getting the back off can be quite a challenge unless you have a really good tool and perhaps some penetrating oil to loosen things up. Yes really nice case marking. When I was in school we were taught to mark the cases and  the American watch and clockmakers Institute even had a? So if you joined at one time they would give you an identification number. They were explaining or giving an example of if the watches ever found in you have a unique number they can perhaps figure out the history of the watch or identify the body it's attached to for instance not that that probably comes up that often. So you got a unique number and even made a special metal stamp that you can purchase. It wasn't a super big aggressive stamp but still it left a mark in the back of the case. Then I heard from people at work on Rolex watches they were using a felt pen indelible but later on they decided that was bad because apparently the ink could release  chemicals although it seems like once it's dry that shouldn't be an issue. Then of course today was nice is you can keep computer records sealed have to mark anything at all I personally find it's best to leave no reference behind that you were even there. Especially when you have a beautiful watch that has no markings at all and now it has your scribbling all over it not good typically if there is a typical and watch repair?  a lot of minor repairs you don't need to do a complete servicing. But beyond a certain point you're going to have to take apart a lot of stuff you're going to disrupt the lubrication even if it looks perfect right now and yes you might as well just go ahead the service the whole thing. also in a watch like this where a lot of things seem to be going on the complete service would be better then you'll know exactly where you stand versus dealing with unknown mysteries for prior repair.
    • That Island looks pretty good on the pics I found. Must be nice to live there. Welcome! Are there many watchmakers over there?
    • I believe so. I thought about it the last time.
    • Could you fit a sapphire crystal? My 'daily wearer' Breitling Aerospace is 22 years old and there isn't a mark on the sapphire crystal.  
    • Oh that's neat. I typically use a thin strap of rodico laid over the pallet fork to affix it to the upper plate but it can be hard to retrieve sometimes. And as I did more research, I may have just found your own earlier explanation: https://learntimeonline.com/forums/topic/potence-clip-for-full-plate-p-ws/
×
×
  • Create New...