Jump to content

Seiko Magic


digginstony

Recommended Posts

Back in the summer I acquired a military style Seiko 5 watch.

Fortunately I was able to aquire the latest version.

This is a beauty and fitted with the comparatively new 4R36 movement which supercedes the old 7S36 though the movement is still abundant.

The 4R36 has the hand wind facility and hacking. This watch is accurate and with me gaining 3 seconds a day. See the pics and the timegrapher at dial up.275d04e9ecda178a4b599851e15532ef.jpg1dc6010ebd4453fbe66431025055cb71.jpg11370b50aadd895cdb7e3ac030144817.jpg

Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice acquisition.

I have had quite a few watches with new 7s26 and more recently some with 4r36. My experience is that the 4r36 seem to be more accurate out of the box but they're basically the same as the 7s26 apart from maybe an extra 3 jewels. I don't know if it's because they're being regulated better at the factory or whether the extra jewels have an influence.

Current 4R36 include a SRPA21, SRP777 and a modified SRP275

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/27/2016 at 5:27 PM, digginstony said:

Fortunately I was able to aquire the latest version.

This is a beauty and fitted with the comparatively new 4R36 movement which supercedes the old 7S36 though the movement is still abundant.

To be exact, the 4R36 is not a "latest version" and does not replace the 7S26, which remains in production, mainly for marketing reason, as it allows Seiko to segment their mechanical watches offer, that is Seiko 5 "non Sports".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be exact, the 4R36 is not a "latest version" and does not replace the 7S26, which remains in production, mainly for marketing reason, as it allows Seiko to segment their mechanical watches offer, that is Seiko 5 "non Sports".


Possibly I should of been more precise. It's the latest version of a military style watch for me.
The photos clearly show its a sports model I thought ?

Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SRP515? What's in a model number anyway?! NICE watch...love my 4R, although if I'm late or early for some event,

I usually don't blame my watch, (it's easier to blame the wife, kids or the dogs!):thumbsu:


Yep it's the Model SRP515. Which is a sports model and not the basic "5" Which I may inadvertently lead people to believe. The later sports models seem to be fitted with the 4r as opposed to the 7s.
Whether this is a trend or not I couldn't say, not being privy to Seiko marketing secrets. Anyway regardless of model, it's a great watch.
My other Seiko "Military Style " is the basic and fitted with 7s26-c movement with its revamped "Regulator " with longer pins as opposed to the 7s26-b which the general accusation seems to be that the hairspring can jump the pins with a mild impact.
This is a great watch as well.

Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hell0 @nevenbekriev. Thank you for your advice. I have removed the old setting using my staking set--I will keep the KIF spring, since it is still good.  I am awaiting the replacement setting, and will update when I do that. In the mean time, I looked at the escape wheel and it looks ok. What do you think?    
    • Aloha All, I recently bought this Seitz tool on eBay, but it is missing some pushers reamers.  I ended up ordering new parts for those that were missing before I received the actual Seitz tool (bad idea).   Upon inspecting the pushers/bits, I noticed 23 of the 56 provided with the set had no numbers. Further inspection revealed a huge difference in the quality of those unnumbered.  Do all Seitz pushers/bits have a number on them?  I'm pretty sure that 33 of the 56 I received are cheap Chinese knockoffs.  The worst part is that I ordered $80 of parts to replace the missing pushers/bits, and now I'm looking to return the tool. I'm not crazy, right? If these are Seitz parts, they should all be numbered, correct? The first two pictures are the Seitz (numbered), and the other pictures are the suspect parts.  Will I even be able to get a refund?  Thanks, Frank     
    • It was £10 + min fee, total £16, could not leave it there. Its a Stanton A.D.2. http://stanton-instruments.co.uk/
    • Chief- The picture below shows the three parts from the dial side that are most useful to "fingerprint" a movement in conjunction with the diameter of the movement.  That's why forum participants are always asking for dial side photos in posts asking for identification.  As far as the setting lever screw, it actually sits loose in the main plate. The threads engage the setting lever below, and the elongated stem above the shoulder sticks through a hole in one of the bridge plates so that it's held captive if unscrewed all the way.  So you may be fine as far as that goes. 
    • So I found what I believe is the setting lever screw! Am I right in thinking the screw next to the click is the correct one for the setting lever? However if it is, it doesn't fit in the hole which I believe is for it! I can get the lever to sit nicely on the stem and line up with a hole, but the screw only goes as far as the shoulder and stops. It's as though the hole is too small! The dial side has been disassembled by the way, the other wheels are in my tray
×
×
  • Create New...