Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Oh wise and wondrous watch gurus....

I have a Timex T49878: https://www.amazon.ca/Timex-T49878-Expedition-Military-Field/dp/B006KY5V0O 

It has sentimental value and I am trying to get it working again.

Specs:

Caliber: M905
Linge Size: 13½
Thickness (MM): 3.65mm
Hand Size: 120/70/20
Stem: 401-2017
Cell/Battery/Power Source: 2016
Tap Size: 10
Includes: Protective Case, Stem, and Power source.
Other Information: INDIGLO

I managed to find a new stem (401-2017)

Now I need a crown and it looks like a short post is used to operate the “glo”, but it isn’t clear what the length of the post.   

Can anyone identify a crown that I could use or indicate what I should be looking for ? 

 

 

  

Posted

Thanks for the prompt reply. Much appreciated.

Unfortunately, Cousins customer service has been either unwilling or unable to answer this question.  

I ordered the stem from Cousins and asked what crown I could use but so far all I have received is a runaround to what would seem a simple question from a company that theoretically has a expertise in this field. 

So far I have received a better reply from Chinese sellers on eBay than Cousins.

 

     

 

 

Posted

Hi MilTime,

Although I'm not familiar with Timex watches much, if you only require a crown, -- and you don't have the original -- you need to estimate the dimensions and find one among the supplier's listed ones. That's normal procedure....

Cheers,

Bob

Posted
On 9/7/2016 at 9:36 PM, bobm12 said:

Hi MilTime,

Although I'm not familiar with Timex watches much, if you only require a crown, -- and you don't have the original -- you need to estimate the dimensions and find one among the supplier's listed ones. That's normal procedure....

Cheers,

Bob

Many thanks Bobm12

Very useful info, new to this so its like groping in the dark at some points.

I found a hi-res pic online that is getting me closer.

I am waiting on the delivery of a digital caliper to measure the stem post on the case.

I suspect from the picture below that the rubber seal(s) are on the inside of the crown and the crown covers the stem post for waterproofing.

So once I can measure the stem post on the case, I suspect that I will be moving closer to target.  

s-l1600 (3).jpg

Posted

Correct, you need to measure the tube (outside diameter) where the crown inserts (case side). You will also measure the clearance where the crown will eventually sit (case side). Finally you will eye ball (with the help of the caliper if you would) the height (thickness?) of the crown or to be more specific, how much would it, once seated in its normal watch wearing position, will it protrude.

Eventually you will find a standard crown (water proof) that will fit the dimensions you come up with plus or minus...not really exact.

Esslinger makes the choice a little easier because of the way their page is structured so that would be a starting point to check on dimensions. Afterwards you can order from your preferred supplier. I would go by the ones without post (fail safe) unless I know the diameter of the post will fit the tube (inner diameter of tube).

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
9 hours ago, bobm12 said:

Correct, you need to measure the tube (outside diameter) where the crown inserts (case side). You will also measure the clearance where the crown will eventually sit (case side). Finally you will eye ball (with the help of the caliper if you would) the height (thickness?) of the crown or to be more specific, how much would it, once seated in its normal watch wearing position, will it protrude.

Eventually you will find a standard crown (water proof) that will fit the dimensions you come up with plus or minus...not really exact.

Esslinger makes the choice a little easier because of the way their page is structured so that would be a starting point to check on dimensions. Afterwards you can order from your preferred supplier. I would go by the ones without post (fail safe) unless I know the diameter of the post will fit the tube (inner diameter of tube).

Many thanks for that Bob, thats extremely useful information !

Now I am moving forward ! :biggrin:

Edited by MilTimeCan
Posted

Most Timex watches that I had the misfortune to handle all those years ago. The buttons just pushed on, the stem never had a thread to take a screw on button. We used to send the little buggers to Scotland I think it was Dundee, someone on here will tell me If I've got the wrong town. The reason we sent them away they were not worth repairing.

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted
On 9/9/2016 at 9:54 AM, bobm12 said:

Correct, you need to measure the tube (outside diameter) where the crown inserts (case side). You will also measure the clearance where the crown will eventually sit (case side). Finally you will eye ball (with the help of the caliper if you would) the height (thickness?) of the crown or to be more specific, how much would it, once seated in its normal watch wearing position, will it protrude.

Eventually you will find a standard crown (water proof) that will fit the dimensions you come up with plus or minus...not really exact.

Esslinger makes the choice a little easier because of the way their page is structured so that would be a starting point to check on dimensions. Afterwards you can order from your preferred supplier. I would go by the ones without post (fail safe) unless I know the diameter of the post will fit the tube (inner diameter of tube).

Very useful Bob !

The calipers just came in the mail.

The Tube Opening OD is 2.5 mm and the case thickness is 6 mm.

I am closing in on a candidate (below)

The post length is the last point of contention, its not flush and 1mm looks a bit long if I take the picture above into consideration. 

timex.jpg

Posted

That looks like a winner MilTime, let us know how you get on. Remember to add a little Loctite 222 to the threads of the stem...

Cheers,

Bob

Posted
 

 

16 hours ago, bobm12 said:

That looks like a winner MilTime, let us know how you get on. Remember to add a little Loctite 222 to the threads of the stem...

Cheers,

Bob

I will heed those words of wisdom (Loctite 222), thanks ! 

  • Like 1
  • 1 month later...
Posted
On 10/2/2016 at 0:25 AM, bobm12 said:

That looks like a winner MilTime, let us know how you get on. Remember to add a little Loctite 222 to the threads of the stem...

Cheers,

Bob

Bob,

Finally got the crown.

Getting closer but not quite there yet :blink:

The stem and crown mate but not fully :huh:

But the watch movement does work again :woohoo-jumping-smiley-emoticon:

Not quite sure what the next option would be.

The crown doesn't fully insert into the tube, it protrudes significantly when fully inserted.

Now that I have specs, I am wondering if I should try a different crown or all they basically all the same in manufacture ?

Having never done this procedure, I am a bit reluctant to cut the stem with the threading.  

Thoughts ?

DSCN3842.JPGDSCN3843.JPG

Posted
On 10/2/2016 at 0:25 AM, bobm12 said:

That looks like a winner MilTime, let us know how you get on. Remember to add a little Loctite 222 to the threads of the stem...

Cheers,

Bob

Ok...I see there's a bit of "adjusting" to do...

 

 

Posted (edited)

Welcome to learning curve 101,

What I need isn't a short post crown, its a dustproof crown...:wacko:

Back to the calipers and online catalogs...:startle:

83.144WREF__34137.1477075311.500.750.jpg 

 

Edited by MilTimeCan
Posted (edited)
16 minutes ago, Geo said:

Have a read of this, it might help you.

 

Thanks Geo, I need all the help I can get.:huh:

I appear to be at this stage of my watch repair learning curve:

mouse.jpg

Edited by MilTimeCan
  • Like 2
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I believe @nickelsilver has a setup like that.
    • I posted pictures earlier in this thread. My lathe and mill are two separate instruments. I think I have seen examples of putting a milling head on a lathe bed...but not certain.
    • Timex Camper, September 1994, new to me. Strap is an old perlon with "Germany" in script etched into the resin on the tail end. Not Horlon or Eulit I believe. History unknown, running strong, losing less than a minute a day. Goals for this: Wear it a ton! Buy crystal lift, clean out the gunk around the ring and under the crystal Eventually swap into a stainless steel case. I've seen a member who has swapped a Timex mechanical movement into the Timex J.Crew quartz field watch case.
    • One of the problems we would have with a watchmaker's lathe is they were made over considerable span of time and manufacturing in the early days probably wasn't as good as it was today. Then if you look at the older catalogs typically it was just the head a few collets and something to rest graver on. So basically a basic lathe with over time things acquired but acquired things may or may not fit. Order today you purchase a used lathe that all kinds of nifty bits and pieces from a seller that acquired from? This would come back to that the basic watchmaker's lathe was used for basic watchmaking like turning things with a hand graver. Then limited indexing is fine because you can make things like stems Which don't need a whole bunch indexing   In the link above the word vector is mentioned and at the link below you can purchase one. Then of course you're going to need the motor that's a little bit extra for the price. https://www.hswalsh.com/product/lathe-vector-watchmakers-48-collets-hl11. That you're going to need some bonus parts like these found this picture online show the classic way of classic gear cutting.   The lathe could have a much bigger indexing disk but it has to be mounted close to the edge. Otherwise you're going to have a whole bunch of smaller disks like this which I think has notches rather than holes. Then as wonderful as these pictures look actually cutting a gear with this is not entirely fun. Look at all is belts all pulling on things and this is a watchmaker's lathe lightweight with lots of bits and pieces attached. It would make more sense if you actually cut a gear with something like this and it tends to be it's not really the best way to do it looks nice on paper but it is not the best way to go. Reality for cutting watch parts would be a bigger machine is much better. Than getting rid of all those belts and pulleys also good. Here is an interesting channel I would've liked of found a different video but this was nice and short if you look at his video as he uses a stepping motor and worm gear assembly for the indexing plate. In this particular video it gets attached to the lathe at about one minute and seven seconds and it looks like it's hiding looks like he has a Sherline. I do know he's had other stuff you'll just have to go through his videos to find it. Then at about one minute and 22 seconds you find out if you set up things appropriately. It's always bad we end up with half a tooth at the very end. Then you will note big lathe yes he's getting a big gear but you could easily cut a watch gear with the setup. And it definitely way more stable than a watchmaker's lathe.         Oh here's a company they been in business since 1911 http://www.fwderbyshireinc.com/  
    • Hello and welcome from Leeds, England. 
×
×
  • Create New...