Jump to content

Wostok 2214 Double Third Wheel


Recommended Posts

Hello everybody!

 

I opened yesterday a Wostok 2214 (date, centre second) and I had a surprise when I found a “double” third wheel! I searched the service manual and there it was, part 211 – double third wheel and pinion.

Does anybody know, by any chance, why did they use a double wheel? And for the cleaning, I suppose I have to take them apart those two wheels, don’t I? I don't think they rotate sepparetely.

Thank you!
Bogdan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd guess that it drives the centre second wheel for the sweep second hand. If this is the case, do not separate them for cleaning.

This is just my opinion, please take other advice before proceeding!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yes, it does drive the center second whel and also the fourth wheel. But from my observation, the height of both pinions is the same of the both-wheels-summed-up-height. So why would you use two wheels instead of only one of the total height. Anyway, I have to clean it. How do I do that without taking them apart. Do I put oil between them them? I suppose hp1300 would be ok.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Again my take on this is:

Disassemble the watch but do not try to separate these "double wheels" then clean thoroughly.

On reassembly only lubricate plain pivots, jewelled pivots and contact surfaces of sliding mechanisms.

Do not lubricate any of the gears.

Please do nothing until this be confirmed or otherwise by one of the professional watchmakers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
I would like to ask again about this double third wheel.

I understand that it’s for the seconds hand not to jump 4-5 seconds when you set the time backwards.

I sort of cleaned the wostok 2214 with the double third wheel, but at the end, the seconds hand still jumps when setting the time backwards-forwards. Maybe they got loose and there is not enough friction between those two wheels… I don’t know.

 

Could anyone explain their purpose or how they should work?

 

Thank you,

Bogdan

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is not rare at all, the dial code and case code don't usually match.
    • Good question!! Anyone know of a substitute movement??!! 🤔🙏
    • Interesting issue that I just noticed: this Seiko 5actus Watch from 1977 has a calibre listing on the dial of 7019-8030R but on the case back it says 7019-8010!! Like a mis-printed coin, is this watch therefore worth a lot of money for its rarity?? 🤪😲🤔🤪
    • I wish that was the case. The Aegler movements used in the early days by Wilsdorf & Davis (for brands like Rolex and Rolco) came in several sizes and without designated calibre numbers that survive.  They become a bit easier to identify during the 1920s. Below is an Aegler-Rebberg, 25.74mm in diameter. It’s from a woman’s Rolex wristwatch. Stamped Rebberg and 500 on the dial plate (but it isn’t a Rebberg 500, it’s the wrong size).  I’d be interested if anyone can identify the movement.  It is based off the Aegler Nr.1, circa 1903, but they based many many calibres of different sizes on it. The closest I have to a positive ID is the  ‘Rolex Nr.50’ circa 1917, but no dial side images or movement sizes are available in the references. There are identical looking movements in many sizes.  The 25.74mm of this movement is a particularly strange size for the era, it equates to 11.41 lignes.      Best Regards, Mark
    • It looks like this movement comes with a number of different shock settings. Emmywatch shows that it comes in versions with no shock settings, 'Incabloc', 'shock resist', and 'Supershock'. Perhaps the different settings position the impulse jewel/roller table in a non-ideal position relative to the pallet fork/guard pin. Are you able to check under high magnification if the pallet fork and roller table are able to operate without any interference? Just for fun I took a look and I have one FHF 70 in my collection, a West End Secundus with a non-shock protected FHF70. I had a note with the watch that said, "Movement is stamped 'FHF 70', but the FHF70 looks to have sub-seconds instead of center seconds movement (??)" but that a google search turned up both types for this movement. EDIT: I just took a look in my parts drawer and I have a few of these movements, both in center seconds and sweep seconds, but they all are non-shock protected.  
×
×
  • Create New...