Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

So my next adventure in this hobby is replacing jewels. The picture has a jewel supported by a two screw holding ring ov some sort. How do you get this jewel out to replace it and then do you push it back in with a jewellers staking set? 8e361d3aa56caaadcd00e8d969d0ef11.jpg I have also purchased this block. Is there a simple way ov doing this using the block?9fab5a5ce736bfe4827884a59b463f87.jpg

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

You undo the two small screws and the cup that holds the jewel should come away from the plate. You will need a proper jeweling tool set as this also has the reamers in case you need to make the diameter of the hole larger, you also press the jewel with the jeweling tool using one of the different stakes that are provided out.  You will need the correct type of jewel, pivot hole size and diameter of the jewel, a little larger in diameter of the whole jewel would still be alright but not overlarge. You also use the tool for pushing the new jewel in place, you have a setting depthing wheel to make sure you have the correct end shake so that the jewel hasn't been pushed too far into the plate. That block you have isn't needed for this type of work. All the necessary tools needed come in the jeweling set, you need to check what you are buying if second hand. One other thing the small press in setters are spring loaded this helps so the jewel doesn't crack when fitting. You will also need a pivot hole gauge and a jewel gauge if you buy your jewels by a varied selection. You also need to look up the types of jewels that are used in watches and the reason different ones are used.       

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted
You undo the two small screws and the cup that holds the jewel should come away from the plate. You will need a proper jeweling tool set as this also has the reamers in case you need to make the diameter of the hole larger, you also press the jewel with the jeweling tool using one of the different stakes that are provided out.  You will need the correct type of jewel, pivot hole size and diameter of the jewel, a little larger in diameter of the whole jewel would still be alright but not overlarge. You also use the tool for pushing the new jewel in place, you have a setting depthing wheel to make sure you have the correct end shake so that the jewel hasn't been pushed too far into the plate. That block you have isn't needed for this type of work. All the necessary tools needed come in the jeweling set, you need to check what you are buying if second hand. One other thing the small press in setters are spring loaded this helps so the jewel doesn't crack when fitting. You will also need a pivot hole gauge and a jewel gauge if you buy your jewels by a varied selection. You also need to look up the types of jewels that are used in watches and the reason different ones are used.       

Thank you for taking the time to provide the relevant information. I have been thinking about purchasing a jewelling set but may wait until I am up to my neck with replacements needed. This is a bit of an investment. Would you recommend anything new?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

Why do you want to replace it ? don't see any problem in your picture.

It's look like a 23j Waltham so it's a valuable watch. As oldhippy says changing a jewel is not so obvious ; second the method described is for friction jewels (the modern type) and these Waltham used jewels in setting (the jewel is burnished in the setting) . In the old time they were plenty of available parts and the watchmakers can replace easily the setting. Nowadays finding a replacement is a hard job.

In my opinion, replacing the setting by a friction jewel, even if it can be done, is not a good idea as this will  drop the value of this watch. The best option is to find a donor movement.

 

  • Like 1
Posted
Why do you want to replace it ? don't see any problem in your picture.

It's look like a 23j Waltham so it's a valuable watch. As oldhippy says changing a jewel is not so obvious ; second the method described is for friction jewels (the modern type) and these Waltham used jewels in setting (the jewel is burnished in the setting) . In the old time they were plenty of available parts and the watchmakers can replace easily the setting. Nowadays finding a replacement is a hard job.

In my opinion, replacing the setting by a friction jewel, even if it can be done, is not a good idea as this will  drop the value of this watch. The best option is to find a donor movement.

 

Acknowledged and thanks. From a technique point if view, I see people pushing out the jewel and setting with a piece of carved peg wood, but how do you get one back in without a jewellers set tool ?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

this is for balance hole jewels, and you don't need a jewellers set tool to put these back; except if damaged train jewel don't need to be removed.

  • Like 1
Posted
this is for balance hole jewels, and you don't need a jewellers set tool to put these back; except if damaged train jewel don't need to be removed.

Thanks. That's it for now...mainspring replacements and cleaning next week.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted
17 minutes ago, syfre said:

this is for balance hole jewels, and you don't need a jewellers set tool to put these back; except if damaged train jewel don't need to be removed.

He wants to practice in taking out and putting back jewels and asked the way to go about such a task and what tools he would need. It is most important to use the correct tool for the job, so if you are replacing jewels or resetting them into a watch plate or balance cock you use a jewelers staking tool set.   

  • Like 1
Posted
He wants to practice in taking out and putting back jewels and asked the way to go about such a task and what tools he would need. It is most important to use the correct tool for the job, so if you are replacing jewels or resetting them into a watch plate or balance cock you use a jewelers staking tool set.   

Agree. I am the type that will take the effort to better technique. Like bottom dealing cards (also an amateur magicians)

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

Oldhippy is perfectly correct. A jewelling tool is a must. The old waltham movements don't require a jewelling tool for the balance jewels because the "Setting" sits on an internal shoulder in the balance cock and main plate and can be removed and replaced with a piece of pegwood. Some can be quite tight to remove and can be, gently, tapped out with pegwood. When placing back, lightly push back in with pegwood until it stops on the internal shoulder (giving correct end shake ) then refit end stone.

Tony

Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted
Oldhippy is perfectly correct. A jewelling tool is a must. The old waltham movements don't require a jewelling tool for the balance jewels because the "Setting" sits on an internal shoulder in the balance cock and main plate and can be removed and replaced with a piece of pegwood. Some can be quite tight to remove and can be, gently, tapped out with pegwood. When placing back, lightly push back in with pegwood until it stops on the internal shoulder (giving correct end shake ) then refit end stone.

Tony

Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk

Thanks for the advice. I do plan on picking up a jeweling tool in the fall perhaps. No immediate need at this moment.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

for replacing this type of balance jewels jewels you could use jewel pusher - it looks like sleeve wrench - ring with arms around - different size of arms for jewels. Problem with jewels mounted on the plate is, as it was mentioned above, it has to be set on certain height for fit and  shake - for that you would need jeweling set. Simple balance jewels are easier - peg wood or jewel pusher - so that investment is much smaller. For pusher is about 15-25$.

I couldnt find better auction but if you look at this http://www.ebay.com/itm/Vintage-Watchmaker-Tool-Lot-/222150813140?hash=item33b93865d4:g:6sYAAOSw9k5XQjMQ  you will get an idea how jewel pusher looks like - star like tool on first picture.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thanks for this post MikePilk, I just came across a similar problem with an Omega 1022.  The problem I had was the seconds pinion spring was bent out of shape and did not even engage with the wheel properly, so the seconds hand was not moving at all. (no power loss though :) I removed the automatic module so I could access the spring and work on it. Once I bent it back close to the right shape, I experienced the same problem you reported about power loss.  Many tweaks later, and the seconds hand is moving properly again, with amplitude back to good numbers again. Cheers
    • After cleaning up the pivots, I made bushes on the lathe. At this point I've pressed in 6 bushes (3 sets) and the wheels turn smooth. What I can also tell you, is that I'm not looking forward to final assembly. Getting the pivots aligned seems to get exponentially more difficult with each wheel that is added.
    • Islands are interesting places to live depending upon their size and other factors. This is a bigger island and it has a bridge to get there at least on one end. It's also big enough that you don't have to go someplace else to get things typically. It can be a problem if you get a job in Seattle though. Yes I've known of people who commuted from the island to Seattle for a job and I don't quite remember how many hours it took but it took a long time. So basically islands are nice if you don't have to leave very often.
    • Thanks @JohnR725! Everything you say makes a lot of sense and is encouraging to read.
    • isn't it nice to have a decent case open or when the case doesn't want to be opened? In the case of a Rolex watch that supposed to pass specific water resistant testing you probably do need to tighten the back down. But they shouldn't be tightened so much that they risk stripping the threads out. Then the other problem that comes up is the gaskets can start to disintegrate and then getting the back off can be quite a challenge unless you have a really good tool and perhaps some penetrating oil to loosen things up. Yes really nice case marking. When I was in school we were taught to mark the cases and  the American watch and clockmakers Institute even had a? So if you joined at one time they would give you an identification number. They were explaining or giving an example of if the watches ever found in you have a unique number they can perhaps figure out the history of the watch or identify the body it's attached to for instance not that that probably comes up that often. So you got a unique number and even made a special metal stamp that you can purchase. It wasn't a super big aggressive stamp but still it left a mark in the back of the case. Then I heard from people at work on Rolex watches they were using a felt pen indelible but later on they decided that was bad because apparently the ink could release  chemicals although it seems like once it's dry that shouldn't be an issue. Then of course today was nice is you can keep computer records sealed have to mark anything at all I personally find it's best to leave no reference behind that you were even there. Especially when you have a beautiful watch that has no markings at all and now it has your scribbling all over it not good typically if there is a typical and watch repair?  a lot of minor repairs you don't need to do a complete servicing. But beyond a certain point you're going to have to take apart a lot of stuff you're going to disrupt the lubrication even if it looks perfect right now and yes you might as well just go ahead the service the whole thing. also in a watch like this where a lot of things seem to be going on the complete service would be better then you'll know exactly where you stand versus dealing with unknown mysteries for prior repair.
×
×
  • Create New...