Jump to content

Screws, screws, and yet more screws!


Recommended Posts

Hi all.

I was wondering if there is a sure fire way of NOT mixing up screws when reassembling a watch? The reason I ask is that I try to take as much care as humanly possible to keep the little sub-assemblies segregated; bridges with their screws, etc. I also photograph every step of the disassembly and have the photos on my computer screen when I'm actually reassembling the movement. Despite all this, the screws usually get mixed up and I end up guessing which one goes where on occasion. I think this mix up occurs during cleaning when stuff tends to mix together. 

Very often the screws have the same thread but one is slightly longer than the other and logic doesn't seem to help in deciding which one goes where. So any suggestions about this - is it experience over time that is the answer, i.e., do you just know what screw goes where once you worked over enough movements or is there some technique you use to prevent this confusion? 

Snow in the forecast for Edmonton this weekend - maybe I should have emigrated to Australia instead!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

when i was a hardware tech, taking apart laptops and printers and phones and other electronics, I just laid out the parts left to right across the desk/table as I disassembled whatever I was working on and then reverse to put it back together.  I didn't have the washing up step so it was easy as everything was right where I left it.  I can remember one Dell Latitude model that had 4 or 5 different screw lengths and the holes weren't marked as to which screw went into each hole and the screws were used to complete the grounding on the boards and if you got it wrong the laptop wouldn't power on.  if you got it really wrong, you'd fry the darn thing.  The following year, they started molding reference letters into the plastic.

With cars, it was the same kind of thing, lay the stuff out in order and keep things that go together, together.

in the beginning with watches, i used post-its and put the parts on a post-it. and i was washing parts by hand so i would keep them separate that way.  with the washer, they would go into separate little thimble screw-together holders.

in the beginning, you just need to document everything but it gets easier with practice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I disassemble the movement I simply screw the screw back into the hole it came out of once the bit it was securing has been removed before moving on to the next part.

Disadvantages; it adds a little time to the dismantling process.

Advantages; the screws never get mixed up, and there is much less risk of them going missing during the cleaning process.

If you look over any of my walk throughs you will see the screws have been replaced at each step.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Practice is what it takes. When you have good experience you will find you will be able to put all the screws together, as an apprentice I would put the screws with the part, when it came to cleaning I would try and put identical screws with the parts in a section of the basket, got mixed up a few times but as I said its experience.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Scouseget said:

Hi all.

I was wondering if there is a sure fire way of NOT mixing up screws when reassembling a watch? The reason I ask is that I try to take as much care as humanly possible to keep the little sub-assemblies segregated; bridges with their screws, etc.

Label the tray, and keep screws segregated there, no need to wash them. Note this is my just opinion. I do not want to get into another debate on the benefits of washing and moving around screws or parts that are clean and do not carry friction.

P1292185.JPG

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

FWIW, I have several of those small micro screen holders (lower right side of white tray in jdm's picture), and put applicable screws and the bridge/plate/bracket piece together in separate holders to help keep them straight for cleaning and re-assembly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is not rare at all, the dial code and case code don't usually match.
    • Good question!! Anyone know of a substitute movement??!! 🤔🙏
    • Interesting issue that I just noticed: this Seiko 5actus Watch from 1977 has a calibre listing on the dial of 7019-8030R but on the case back it says 7019-8010!! Like a mis-printed coin, is this watch therefore worth a lot of money for its rarity?? 🤪😲🤔🤪
    • I wish that was the case. The Aegler movements used in the early days by Wilsdorf & Davis (for brands like Rolex and Rolco) came in several sizes and without designated calibre numbers that survive.  They become a bit easier to identify during the 1920s. Below is an Aegler-Rebberg, 25.74mm in diameter. It’s from a woman’s Rolex wristwatch. Stamped Rebberg and 500 on the dial plate (but it isn’t a Rebberg 500, it’s the wrong size).  I’d be interested if anyone can identify the movement.  It is based off the Aegler Nr.1, circa 1903, but they based many many calibres of different sizes on it. The closest I have to a positive ID is the  ‘Rolex Nr.50’ circa 1917, but no dial side images or movement sizes are available in the references. There are identical looking movements in many sizes.  The 25.74mm of this movement is a particularly strange size for the era, it equates to 11.41 lignes.      Best Regards, Mark
    • It looks like this movement comes with a number of different shock settings. Emmywatch shows that it comes in versions with no shock settings, 'Incabloc', 'shock resist', and 'Supershock'. Perhaps the different settings position the impulse jewel/roller table in a non-ideal position relative to the pallet fork/guard pin. Are you able to check under high magnification if the pallet fork and roller table are able to operate without any interference? Just for fun I took a look and I have one FHF 70 in my collection, a West End Secundus with a non-shock protected FHF70. I had a note with the watch that said, "Movement is stamped 'FHF 70', but the FHF70 looks to have sub-seconds instead of center seconds movement (??)" but that a google search turned up both types for this movement. EDIT: I just took a look in my parts drawer and I have a few of these movements, both in center seconds and sweep seconds, but they all are non-shock protected.  
×
×
  • Create New...