Jump to content

New additions to the K and D Inverto staking tool reference site


Recommended Posts

I've made a number of new additions to the K and D Inverto staking tool reference site including:

Section for Inverto accessories
1958 version of the K&D tools catalog
High-resolution photographs of a Inverto Deluxe 18R
Two C.& E. Marshall staking tool catalogs (large format and small format) with stake and stump lists

At this point, I've exhausted all of my reference materials. If anyone has any references that I haven't posted and is willing to share, please let me know.

  • Like 5
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Altogether a tremendous piece of work that will help many identify their sets and accessories in the future.

if you have run out of K&D material, you could always start on Boley. ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I love it Tom! I'm still browsing through it. Is there a way to have some sort of "interchangeability" parts info (stakes, stumps, etc) for Bergeon, Star, Boley...whatever is still available to "feed" our K and Ds? Meaning, stuff that it accepts from other manufacturers.

Cheers,

Bob

Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Hertzogpholian said:

Hi Tom: Love your site.  Well done...  :Bravo:

Found it last week when I got my No. 17 and was looking for reference info for the cleaning & restoration.

 

Glad to hear that you've found the site useful. 

Does your No. 17 have the short screw removal stakes (top row in the box)? If so, and any of them are intact, I'd appreciate some information about them. I need to rehab all of the ones in my first No. 18 but I don't know exactly which direction to go.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Geo said:

Altogether a tremendous piece of work that will help many identify their sets and accessories in the future.

if you have run out of K&D material, you could always start on Boley. ;)

Thanks for the kind words Geo. I'd be risking divorce if I started on Boley :-).

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, bobm12 said:

I love it Tom! I'm still browsing through it. Is there a way to have some sort of "interchangeability" parts info (stakes, stumps, etc) for Bergeon, Star, Boley...whatever is still available to "feed" our K and Ds? Meaning, stuff that it accepts from other manufacturers.

Cheers,

Bob

Bob, I hope you find the site helpful. 

A few years ago, Tom Adelstein created a stake compatibility list and posted it on his site http://www.american-globe-tools.com/. He's in between ISPs right now, so you can't download any of his reference files. I've attached a pdf of his list here.

AdelsteinCross-over-punches.pdf

Edited by tomcolson
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, tomcolson said:

Glad to hear that you've found the site useful. 

Does your No. 17 have the short screw removal stakes (top row in the box)? If so, and any of them are intact, I'd appreciate some information about them. I need to rehab all of the ones in my first No. 18 but I don't know exactly which direction to go.

 

If you're referring to the "sub punches" that also appeared in Item #316, then yes.  What info do you need?  Happy to share back anything I can.

My set came with 8 of them but they were more like a collection of broken pivots.  I think maybe 1 or 2 were intact.  I'm not a broken screw puncher-outer though (alum or sulfuric for me) so they've just sat there untouched.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, Hertzogpholian said:

If you're referring to the "sub punches" that also appeared in Item #316, then yes.  What info do you need?  Happy to share back anything I can.

My set came with 8 of them but they were more like a collection of broken pivots.  I think maybe 1 or 2 were intact.  I'm not a broken screw puncher-outer though (alum or sulfuric for me) so they've just sat there untouched.

 

Sounds like your set doesn't have what I'm looking for. The first Inverto sub-punches are different from those in the No. 316. In the picture below, you can see them in the top row across the box. They appear to have been about 1/2 length stakes with hardened tips of various diameters inserted in one end. I have an early No. 18 with the 1/2 length stakes, but they are all so damaged that I can't tell how to rebuild them.

Thanks for the offer to help.

Page 232 Sept 3 1919 The_Jewelers_CircularHiRezDetail.jpg

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ah, sub punches before they were sub punches.  Sorry, no, don't have them.  Did these mini "punch stakes" fit into a regular diameter holder so as to be used in the traditional manner?  Or where they intended to be used free-form?

as to rebuilding, the machinist in me says it would be rather simple: don't bother.  Make up a #316-style replacement. No historical accuracy but a better and more versatile tool.  I'm sure you have some extra stakes laying around - e.g., broken center wheel punches.  just grind the tip flat, put on a slight chamfer so you don't cut yourself and drill a hole of the desired diameter for the punch and insert the sub-punch into the "handle".  press-fit with a slight friction fit since with use, they'll require replacement or if too loose, a minute dab of grease will hold the punch in the handle.  

for the punch insert itself, any carbon steel should work fine.  heat treating will be fun since they're so small.  heat to red, quench in water, vertically in, swirling and then a quick temper in the toaster oven, say 15 minutes at 300F. Probably too small to temper with a torch, the colors would travel too quickly, lighter or the stovetop might work - like when sterilizing a needle to pop a blister.  hours of fun online reading about heat treating, if you're interested.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not 100% clear how the original style sub-punches were constructed or used. 

Option one is an integral, small-diameter shank on one end and a uniformly sized hole on the other. The uniformly sized hole would accept a hardened punch tip which could be easily replaced. To make the sub-punch long enough to be used in the frame, the small shank would have been held in something akin to the No. 120 holder for the more modern sub-punches. 

Option two is that the hardened screw removal tip was integral to the shaft of the sub-punch. The uniformly sized hole in the other end would then be a socket for the end of a plain punch (like the balance staff remover punches) to increase the overall length.

I've seen a lot of sub-punches with ragged nubs on one end and empty holes on the other. I think this indicates that option two is more likely.

I'm looking at this task as a restoration as much as a functional improvement, hence my desire to get back to something close to original. If I decide to make some straight-up, functional replacements, I've got plenty of ratty, old stakes to use as raw material.
 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...

Some new information on the question of the old style screw knocking punches. Uncle Larry just posted a nice Inverto 17 set at http://www.execulink.com/~lfoord/tools.html. Item #5241, towards the bottom of the page.

The screw knocking punches are shown quite clearly in the pictures and are made in the 2nd way we were discussing above. There also appears to be a stake with a long, plain cylindrical end that could be the extension stake.

Mystery solved?

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 3 months later...
  • 3 weeks later...

Apologies that it has taken so long for me to reply to your question.

All K&D punches I've found work in all of the frames I own (a number of different Inverto models and a New Model 12).

What I *think* is true is that all the punches are the same diameter: No. 31 Stubs' Wire Gage, 0.185". I've mic'ed a random selection of punches from my newest, oldest and a middle aged (?) Inverto, and all had diameters within 0.0005" of the No. 31 SWG nominal of 0.185".

One thing to note: the punches from K&D's older (non-Inverto) tools are longer than those in the Inverto.The Inverto punches were likely shortened to facilitate their use when inverted. The longer punches have letter prefixes on the punch number (e.g. A12, B72, etc.)...mostly. I have some longer punches with a letter S *suffix*, not prefix. I've yet to figure out what sets these S punches were used with. Just to be even more confusing, at some point K&D started using an A suffix to denote smaller center holes in some of their (shorter) Inverto punches.

Best of luck with your staking set adventures.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 1 year later...
Bob, I hope you find the site helpful. 
A few years ago, Tom Adelstein created a stake compatibility list and posted it on his site http://www.american-globe-tools.com/. He's in between ISPs right now, so you can't download any of his reference files. I've attached a pdf of his list here.
AdelsteinCross-over-punches.pdf
So does this mean that modern Bergeon punches are compatible with the K&D staking sets?
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 years later...

Not wanting to start a new thread so I'm attaching my question to this one,

I purchased a Moseley staking set and I'm missing a few punches. I reached out to Daves Watch Parts and am awaiting a reply.

After all the above, I'm still unclear if punches from a different brand would fit in mine, or do I need to hunt down Moseley only?

I'm missing the following, A13, B6, E5, H2, I3, K2 and M4. otherwise I think I did pretty good with the 100/25 set at 100 bucks. 

Edited by Tuvia
Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, Tuvia said:

Not wanting to start a new thread so I'm attaching my question to this one,

I purchased a Moseley staking set and I'm missing a few punches. I reached out to Daves Watch Parts and am awaiting a reply.

After all the above, I'm still unclear if punches from a different brand would fit in mine, or do I need to hunt down Moseley only?

I'm missing the following, A13, B6, E5, H2, I3, K2 and M4. otherwise I think I did pretty good with the 100/25 set at 100 bucks. 

I have a complete Marshall set and I've mic'ed K&D, Marshall, Bergeon and Boley stakes and they all mic to 4.71-4.76 mm, so my guess is that MIGHT be the same across the board? Now just cuz I said that a rogue staking kit will be revealed to mic at something different. You watch. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, MechanicMike said:

I have a complete Marshall set and I've mic'ed K&D, Marshall, Bergeon and Boley stakes and they all mic to 4.71-4.76 mm, so my guess is that MIGHT be the same across the board? Now just cuz I said that a rogue staking kit will be revealed to mic at something different. You watch. 

And some Lufkin stakes too. 4.7 mm.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nucejoe has made some good points about the calendar mechanism. If the watch physically stops at least the hands stop and the secondhand keeps going that means the watch train is running it means that it's a disconnect between the gear train and our minute hand in calendar mechanism. The Canon opinion which I'm going but I guess is the type that snaps into a drive wheel. The drive wheel is driven by the gear train the Canon pinion goes on the post there is no friction there. If the friction between the drive wheel in the Canon pinion disintegrates which he can then with the least amount of friction like a calendar mechanism it just quit striving. The hands come to a stop the watch keeps running the secondhand keeps moving because it's independence of all of this. It should have been obvious when the watch was going to gather and you check the setting mechanism before you put the calendar on you would have noticed zero friction as a guess. Even now when you go into hands setting you'll feel like there's no friction at all. Then the reason why the calendar mechanism works when you manually rotate the hands is because the setting wheel is driving the Canon pinion directly which is driving the calendar mechanism and that our wheel and all of that so all of that will run from that we just will not run from the gear train running the drive wheel that's connected to the Canon pinion. But that's just my wild guess and then we throw in Nucejoe's possible calendar mechanism increased friction than we need to really isolate all of this or we can continue to guess.  
    • I am not sure if I correctly understand you here. Only the seconds hand keeps running or minute and hour hands do move too, in case minute and hour hands move and show time right, then the fault is in date change train including date jumper mech, but if it doesn't show time correctly ( appear to loose time) then its loose canon pinion. You can tighten a loose canon pinion, use grease to lube it, not oil.
    • Thank you for your introduction and welcome to this friendly forum.
    • always confusing when it's two separate watches but I'm going to assume they're basically identical. What was their condition before you service them in other words did have a problem before and the problem came after you've serviced or was the problems there before? Then timing machine results you do have a timing machine don't you? In other words what's the running condition of the watch like of the watches barely running that would be an issue for a calendar change   then you fix the problem? so I'm guessing we only have to worry about the 2778 then? Yes this is what happens when you have multiple watches with too much going on it becomes confusing. then it would be helpful to have a picture of the dial side components because we didn't memorize every single calendar change mechanism. one of the places to look is the Canon pinion assembly in other words to visit have enough force to drive the calendar mechanism? I'm having to guess because I'm not finding a good tech sheet that shows the parts. If it's a kinda Canon pinion I think which is the Canon pinion that slips into her presses into with friction with the wheel if it no longer has and the friction then a cannot drive the calendar but if you manually set the watch that drives the Canon pinion directly and everything should function. then if you two of the parts list it would be listed as canon pinion with drive wheel. .But it would be helpful in the picture just to make sure http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?10&ranfft&0&2uswk&ETA_2778  
    • I think what the problem here is you're asking the wrong question. The question is what part number do I need so that I can end up with the correct balance? Or the correct balance staff for that matter? If you look at the second link it lists the parts for your watch. This is always where things get interesting? you'll notice for balance staff they list seven different ones. For balance complete they do show three but if you look at the part numbers there's only two. then I attached some images from bestfit online and of course additional problems perhaps. Notice you have lots of choices and probably only one that's right. then the physical bestfit book becomes interesting because is an indication that there are variations which is of course why there so many listed in the images. but fortunately it looks like you want the basic simple one which should be 100/66.  unfortunately for the third link it's out of stock. then providing this is the right staff number I snipped out a couple of more images of the bestfit book which is what the dimensions mean and the dimensions. One of the irritating things of the physical book is on the dimension chart if you're trying to find a particular staff you just have to be lucky to go through the list and find it it be really nice if they list of the sizes by the numeric staff also. http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?10&ranfft&0&2uswk&AS_1287 http://cgi.julesborel.com/cgi-bin/matcgi2?ref=AS_1287 http://cgi.julesborel.com/cgi-bin/matcgi2?ref=U\ZD]J http://www.julesborel.com/s.nl/it.A/id.151223/.f  
×
×
  • Create New...