Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

long story, I'm trying to save an Elgin Lancer as they are just too scarce to let one go (late 1950's, swiss import.) I've only seen two in two years and this is one of them. When I got it, someone had removed the crown with a pair of side cutters and crimped the pipe for the stem and left the stem embedded in there as well. I took it gentle and pried it open little by little to allow enough movement on the stem to remove the movement from the mount. had to pry the dial off as the screws were blocked but the movement ring. 

I'm about to get it the replacement stem and crown via a donar movement and need to straighten out the pipe and get rid of the burrs, I'm not worried about it being perfect, just functional.

 

publicpreview.php?x=950&y=620&a=true&fil

 

publicpreview.php?x=950&y=620&a=true&fil

 

I'm new to watch repairs, so if you think this is something I should take to a watch maker / jeweler, then please say so. otherwise I'm happy to have a crack at it. 

Thanks in advance for your time and knowledge.

 

Posted

I think you can file down the tube just as needed to bring it to good shape. That shouldn't affect the function of the crown.

  • Like 1
Posted

Changing the length of the tube will need a new fitting of the stem if at all possible (rust, where gasket of crown seats, etc) for the crown to fit in correctly...worst case scenario, in worthless watches and as an experiment, I've drilled and converted to a "replaceable" tube "system" and fitted a new tube and crown...but honestly, I don't know what to recommend in your case. My methods sometimes are not orthodox but practical from the case specs stand point...or you can weld another stem if you have the proper equipment to do so...I normally don't.

Posted

I think the best would be to do as jdm suggested? As it doesn't have to be watertight and there would be enough tube left. 

Posted

I don't disagree Roger, only giving more options considering we don't really know how the stem and crown fit and the state of the thread in the crown (could be rusted and not safe to remove to make a good fitting). Maybe over thinking it but you might agree that the most vulnerable part of a watch, for water or anything to crawl in, is this part. You see, we have not pictures of the crown and stem...

Posted

These watches were never water resistant to begin with. The stem or tube length can't be changed because the crown has sit near to the case anyway.

As long the crown works in all positions it's fine. One has to deal with things as they are after all.

Posted (edited)

thanks guys and yes, not a waterproof case and I don't wear my vintages in wet weather regardless, so not an issue. 

I tried fitting the new stem in last night and it appears I need to open the pipe up further as its not cleared enough to fit the stem through. I was thinking about using a thin drill bit and tapping it from the inside of the watch case to the outside to go with the shape of the pipe narrowing to try and open it up. good or bad idea ?

 

 

Edited by diveboy
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • isn't it nice to have a decent case open or when the case doesn't want to be opened? In the case of a Rolex watch that supposed to pass specific water resistant testing you probably do need to tighten the back down. But they shouldn't be tightened so much that they risk stripping the threads out. Then the other problem that comes up is the gaskets can start to disintegrate and then getting the back off can be quite a challenge unless you have a really good tool and perhaps some penetrating oil to loosen things up. Yes really nice case marking. When I was in school we were taught to mark the cases and  the American watch and clockmakers Institute even had a? So if you joined at one time they would give you an identification number. They were explaining or giving an example of if the watches ever found in you have a unique number they can perhaps figure out the history of the watch or identify the body it's attached to for instance not that that probably comes up that often. So you got a unique number and even made a special metal stamp that you can purchase. It wasn't a super big aggressive stamp but still it left a mark in the back of the case. Then I heard from people at work on Rolex watches they were using a felt pen indelible but later on they decided that was bad because apparently the ink could release  chemicals although it seems like once it's dry that shouldn't be an issue. Then of course today was nice is you can keep computer records sealed have to mark anything at all I personally find it's best to leave no reference behind that you were even there. Especially when you have a beautiful watch that has no markings at all and now it has your scribbling all over it not good typically if there is a typical and watch repair?  a lot of minor repairs you don't need to do a complete servicing. But beyond a certain point you're going to have to take apart a lot of stuff you're going to disrupt the lubrication even if it looks perfect right now and yes you might as well just go ahead the service the whole thing. also in a watch like this where a lot of things seem to be going on the complete service would be better then you'll know exactly where you stand versus dealing with unknown mysteries for prior repair.
    • That Island looks pretty good on the pics I found. Must be nice to live there. Welcome! Are there many watchmakers over there?
    • I believe so. I thought about it the last time.
    • Could you fit a sapphire crystal? My 'daily wearer' Breitling Aerospace is 22 years old and there isn't a mark on the sapphire crystal.  
    • Oh that's neat. I typically use a thin strap of rodico laid over the pallet fork to affix it to the upper plate but it can be hard to retrieve sometimes. And as I did more research, I may have just found your own earlier explanation: https://learntimeonline.com/forums/topic/potence-clip-for-full-plate-p-ws/
×
×
  • Create New...