Jump to content

Restoring Vintage Remontoir 15 Rubis Pocket Watch


Recommended Posts

I very recently was given a vintage Remontoir Ancre Levees Visibles 15 Rubis BREVETE Silver Pocket Watch, year 1906. I want to restore this watch and the first step for me is to clean it up. I need some suggestions on cleaning the case (silvo perhaps) and real help in restoring the Face Plate. This watch does work but only the second hand moves and the hour hand does not; and the minute hand fell off.

6d2084ec33cdc08e1f9d55773797d334.jpg734588689f383e395f505a060f42c690.jpg26a3ddaf1ffc8504bacb7fb89917ae2c.jpgbb6fdacc2254883292f9af63d9bfe83a.jpg77e16af9fd65eae5d6b1fd1fa2700d42.jpg837f612d3823e5bd0ac41bb69ffd0a46.jpg

From Canada

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, oldhippy said:

It does`t look like enamel. To me it looks like paper or tin.

+1

Ouch. The paint is in very poor shape; the protective layer over the paint seems to be gone.... Not sure what you can do without destroying the paint. It almost looks like it got wet at some point and the oxydation/mildew really did a number on the surface and the ink just disappeared.

Ask a pro if he/she can do something about it.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If that is  enamel you can clean it in soapy water. If it's painted like frenchie says then the only way is a proper dial restorer.

This is an old piece that is Silver and heavy. The numbers do look like paint. It is German made but with Italian wording on the inner movement cover. I may just try and get the yellow out of the crystal and leave it vintage?? ef90f03f4f186918f77b278552e057f5.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I beg to differ with you and agree with oldhippy : if it's really a 1906 watch, the plastic glass is not the original...

And the wording on the inner movement cover is french [emoji6]

ffaa3acd9675c163d434453374466eb6.jpgd22686d2a1f25e002307482ba11245de.jpg1888baad77a398471a65cb102a0b88ae.jpg

Here is the crystal. Just feels like plastic...however I am no expert.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ancre a French word which refers to a mechanical detail about the watch movement, that it is equipped with a lever escapement. Levees Visibles also refers to a mechanical detail, that being the escapement bridges are arranged in such a way that you could see the lever. These details were important to customers in the early era of mass-produced watches, and are commonly seen engraved on the cases of Swiss watches produced from the 1870s through the 1920s.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I beg to differ with you and agree with oldhippy : if it's really a 1906 watch, the plastic glass is not the original...

And the wording on the inner movement cover is french [emoji6]

As well, if you look at the movement cover it says "Milan 1906"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Btw. I was born in France and am half French Canadian and half Swiss, although I speak crappy French and crappy Swiss German. You would easily mistake me for an American. Just a note. And I really do appreciate the advise as I continue to learn.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ah so its you thats buying up all the DD calibres 🤨.
    • Hi Richard,  I keep buying CAL.59 movements to practice on 🙂 Not started yet though, I'm gathering tools and building my confidence to start.
    • Problem solved. For some bizarre reason, the hook on the wall of this barrel is not properly centered vertically, but is oddly high on the wall, maybe 3/4 up the way up. When replacing the mainspring, this caused the outer coil to be displaced upwards as well such that it protrudes out of the barrel and caused the barrel lid to not sit quite flush to the barrel. Since this is a motor barrel, the lid is actually the first wheel and inner coil tube/hook all in one piece, with no “snap down” action that would have made the problem more immediately obvious. Maybe with an older mainspring the spring’s end hole was enlarged such that this wasn’t an issue, but hard to say how it ever worked otherwise. Replacing the barrel with one from a different model 1900 where the hook was properly vertically centered allowed the lid to sit flush without mainspring interference and the friction problem went away. The bridge was far too thick to be bent (and isn’t), for those of you thinking that was the problem. Placing the removable arbor in the watch without the rest of the barrel proved that the proper end shake was actually there as long as the overall height of the assembled barrel was correct.
    • You are so true on a lot of what you have said. The main reason for changing the mainspring even if the old one is in good order is because it will take out your thinking that the mainspring is contributing to poor power output or fluctuations in amplitude. If a new spring is fitted that box can be crossed off as a potential source of a problem. Most customers are happy to pay the extra ÂŁ20 for a new mainspring if they are already parting with a couple of hundred pounds for a service. A new spring is an investment for good running for the future.
    • According to Borel the 814 and 815 use the same escape wheel. It's kind of an oddball being so long.
×
×
  • Create New...