Jump to content

Preamble To A Story


Recommended Posts

I have a story to tell, it's about a man which left this world some years ago, and his many watches.

I've chosen this forum because of its rich human empathy and absence of classist attitude. It will take some more time for me to tell it completely, as it's made of memories that aren't mine in first place, yet must be told with respect and consideration, as they relate to someone that hasn't been lucky at all in his life - Uncle Mario, an avid collector of watches of no value whatsoever, as he couldn't afford anything better. To him, what is junk was a valuable technical and fashion item, and consistently he would get bored of each pretty quickly - does that remind someone that we know?

Below one of the highlights. One jewel unadjusted, but as soon you shake it, it ticks happily just like the first day his owner had it.

To be continued.

post-1542-0-21858200-1457473858_thumb.jp

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice, thanks for sharing...this story MUST continue!  I have a bunch of 1 Jewel watches myself and actively service them.  They're not junk but do need TLC a little more often.  I love them MORE because they're pin-lever and tick loud;)

 

Oh and I am one of those that typically only wears a watch once or twice, which is probably why I have too many now, haha.

Edited by jeffc83
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

thank you for the encouragement. Sorry, i'm begin slow in adding to this. These are the only digital watches Uncle Mario had that arrived to me. 

P4092630.JPG

The white one has a one piece molded strap-back that I had never seen... All started fine with a new battery, just one need a piece of cardboard to keep the the LCD contacts pressed to the module, and new strap.

Below a partial is what he has left. I'm told there were more, but the "really outrageous" ones have been thrown away, which makes me wonder what they really were .

P4092631.JPG 

The small drawer is where I sit while working on my "bench", as it is of the ideal height.

It must be said there are very few mechanical watches in there, which I will show later, or perhaps in some exciting "15 jewels economy movement walk through". But Uncle Mario could not afford more, he was a pensioner with a slight intellectual disability. He had to cry and lie to get the money for his collection from his relatives. I think he was exploited by some shops that kept selling him always the same watches in different fashion style. Interestengly I don't think that is much different from the profile of many watch collectors.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, jdm said:

I think he was exploited by some shops that kept selling him always the same watches in different fashion style. Interestengly I don't think that is much different from the profile of many watch collectors.

Maybe that was a compromise between what he liked and what he could afford...as long as he was happy with them. IMHO, no one will enjoy one's collection more and give it more meaning and value, no matter how frugal, modest or numerous, than its owner.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • To be honest, they're not a good movement to have in a chronograph for several reasons. The first is the chronograph mechanism is a 'bolt on' module; If you look at the side of the watch case the crown won't be in line with the pushers, therefore only the branded company would have the ability to swap out the module because they aren't designed to be serviced and definitely not by an independent watchmaker. Secondly, the ETA 2892 A2 is a great movement, but when the chrono module is used with it it becomes pants, in my opinion/experience. So, going back to your watch. The problem isn't with the base movement, which is the 2892A2, as there would never be that amount of backlash/flutter in the gear train of that particular movement, it is with the chrono bolt on module that the problem lies and when the chrono sweep second hand is engaged the flutter of the second hand is remedied by the stability of the chronograph mechanism negating that flutter. Everything in the chronograph mechanism of that movement is powered by a wheel in the centre where the cannon pinion/driving wheel would normally be. I think it is a crappy design deliberately engineered to be disposable due to the time taken to service the module. Give me a 7750 any day!
    • Yeah not much going on in the town , Scarborough is a bit better,but the missus and me love York. Good antique shops there, The antiques center on stonegate has a good selection of vintage watches, top price though.
    • Thank you for your introduction and welcome to this friendly forum. We all look forward to your contributions and continued involvement. 
    • Brid isn't what it used to be, I only really go to Morrisons in brid. I avoid the town. But Scarborough is nice! I don't mind a wander round the beach between jobs
    • I have had a few issues with my Orient Automatic crystal and bezel. The bezel came off with a case knife and I haven't been able to refit it. Doing a bit of research on here, I think that it is an arrangement where the crystal is snapped over a lip on the caseback and then the bezel is installed over the top like a tension ring. I have managed to crack the crystal trying various attempts to press it onto the case. Measuring the crystal with Vernier calipers, I think it is a Sternkreuz XS 314.171 but I can't correspond that to the reference/ case number on the caseback. I also measured the outer diameter of the lip on the case that it may fit over and this is 30.5mm, which is actually 0.7mm bigger than the static inner diameter. Is it likely that the crystal can be expanded enough to snap over that? The inner diameter of the bezel/ tension ring is 32.2mm which works with 31.4+0.7 = 32.1mm Does this sound correct? What method should I use to snap the crystal and then bezel into place? I have a cheap case back press with nylon dies but I managed to break the old one with this method.       
×
×
  • Create New...