Jump to content

Cosc Question


Recommended Posts

Hell friends,

 

I have recently purchased a Tudor North Flag. It is COSC certified. On my time grapher it runs from -6 to -2 in the six different positions. That is a total of 4 seconds a day

total variation if I am correct. I get a 2 ms beat error. So, my question is this, is this an acceptable range and just a speed error or should I take it in and have it adjusted?

 

Thank you and I look forward to your opinions.

 

P.S. This is my first COSC watch. I mostly have Steinhart's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I found this for you.

 

What's Minus4Plus6.com

The name Minus 4 PLUS 6 is derived from the Contrôle Officiel Suisse des Chronomtres (COSC) standard deviation rate of -4 to +6 seconds within a 24 hour day, tested over a ten day period of chronometer testing, in five positions and at three temperatures. Watches that are within -4 to +6 seconds deviation in a 24 hour period are awarded Official Chronometer Certification by COSC and the movement is engraved with a chronometer serial number. Rolex has a self-imposed stricter standard of -1 to +5 seconds per day and hence the designation, "Superlative Chronometer Officially Certified" on the dial of any COSC certified Rolex watch.

With 86,400 seconds in a 24 hour period (31,536,000 sec/year), a difference of +3 seconds per day is a deviation of 0.000035 (thirty five millionths) of a 24 hour run resulting in 99.99% accuracy. A Rolex watch balance oscillates at a frequency of 28,800 times per hour, - equivalent to a car going 87 mph, and traveling a distance of 3,600 miles a year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I found this for you.

What's Minus4Plus6.com

The name Minus 4 PLUS 6 is derived from the Contrôle Officiel Suisse des Chronomtres (COSC) standard deviation rate of -4 to +6 seconds within a 24 hour day, tested over a ten day period of chronometer testing, in five positions and at three temperatures. Watches that are within -4 to +6 seconds deviation in a 24 hour period are awarded Official Chronometer Certification by COSC and the movement is engraved with a chronometer serial number. Rolex has a self-imposed stricter standard of -1 to +5 seconds per day and hence the designation, "Superlative Chronometer Officially Certified" on the dial of any COSC certified Rolex watch.

With 86,400 seconds in a 24 hour period (31,536,000 sec/year), a difference of +3 seconds per day is a deviation of 0.000035 (thirty five millionths) of a 24 hour run resulting in 99.99% accuracy. A Rolex watch balance oscillates at a frequency of 28,800 times per hour, - equivalent to a car going 87 mph, and traveling a distance of 3,600 miles a year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I found this for you.

What's Minus4Plus6.com

The name Minus 4 PLUS 6 is derived from the Contrôle Officiel Suisse des Chronomtres (COSC) standard deviation rate of -4 to +6 seconds within a 24 hour day, tested over a ten day period of chronometer testing, in five positions and at three temperatures. Watches that are within -4 to +6 seconds deviation in a 24 hour period are awarded Official Chronometer Certification by COSC and the movement is engraved with a chronometer serial number. Rolex has a self-imposed stricter standard of -1 to +5 seconds per day and hence the designation, "Superlative Chronometer Officially Certified" on the dial of any COSC certified Rolex watch.

With 86,400 seconds in a 24 hour period (31,536,000 sec/year), a difference of +3 seconds per day is a deviation of 0.000035 (thirty five millionths) of a 24 hour run resulting in 99.99% accuracy. A Rolex watch balance oscillates at a frequency of 28,800 times per hour, - equivalent to a car going 87 mph, and traveling a distance of 3,600 miles a year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I forget what the official chronometer tolerance is, and google isn't being helpful, am I right in saying it's -5/+5 seconds in 24 hours? 

Anyway to answer the question, -4s is very accurate, chronometers can be more accurate than that but in reality the margin is totally unnoticeable in actual practicality,  and no mechanical watch, Chronometer or otherwise will ever be perfect. I don't personally see this as being worth adjusting. 

Edited by Ishima
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

No I won't. I was just trying to find out if my Tudor was in the right place.           

No, sir, not in the right place, you need to send it to my home address...then it will be in the right place! :D

 

I love Tudors too!! It's a great watch, just use it and enjoy it!

 

Cheers,

 

Bob

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thank you everybody for the replies and advices
    • Yesterday evening I was trolling the net ( as we all do)  when I stumbled on this vid. Last month there was a debate on are Chinese tools worth purchasing and I gave my thoughts that being the biggest differences is the materials used to make them and also they are not built to the Swiss fine tolerances. The tool he shows to compare with the Seitz jeweling tool I am sure is Chinese and shows the point I was tring to make.    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CIqQcVLgtB0
    • Good afternoon. More than once I've damaged balance staffs because  tight steady pins necessitating force to get the balance cock in place. I assume the steady pins get slightly deformed over the years by over enthusiastic balance cock removal. So now I take the lesser evil of using a smoothing broach on the steady pin holes so I get the feel and control back when fitting the cock. Is this the best option or am I missing a trick? Thanks all. 
    • I dont have any personal friends who are watch nerds so I have to share my joy with y'all 🙂  If you saw my other thread I had bought a Elgin Sportsman to start learning on after getting fairly proficient with my practice movement. I ended up stripping out some threads in the main plate and abandoning that project. I was able to clean it and get it running again so I learned a ton.  Next up, a Gruen Precision that I got off ebay. This project took forever and after realizing the balance was no good and buying a donor movement I was able to get it back in working order. I dont have a time grapher yet but I've been wearing it for 2 days and its keeping pretty dang good time!  - Disassembled, cleaned and reassembled / lubed the entire movement.  - Pressed in a new crystal - Replaced the strap - Replaced the crown (the old crown was just destroyed) One thing that really killed me was that I scratched the dial with my hand levers. I was just rushing because I was frustrated (had to take the hands off a few extra times because they weren't flat) lesson learned.    Next up is a Seiko that I also got on ebay. This will be my first automatic, and my first date complication. Super excited and so glad I found this hobby!   
    • Well I actually looked more into it and I think the answer is the following: ST36/3600 is not a clone of ETA6497 it is a clone of OP XI which is a derivation of the ETA. And when you look at both they are actually complete clones (the beat, the bridge shapes even the decoration).  
×
×
  • Create New...