Jump to content

Accuracy.

olympus593
 Share

Recommended Posts

olympus593 New Member

olympus593

Posted
Posted

Hi guys, am new to WRT and like what I see so far!

I was wondering how obsessed (or not) you guys get about the accuracy of your watches?

I have a very modest collection which consist mainly of ETA 2824-2 and Selita SW200-2 movements. They are all of a similar age. What degree of accuracy should I expect from these movements (s/d) and what sort of `settling` in period is normal (if any) before best accuracy should be expected?

Thanks in advance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
perpetual92 Member

perpetual92

Posted
Posted (edited)

ETA 2824's are very capable of good time consistancy, especially if recently serviced.  They do have a tendency to drop off a bit when needing a service.

For instance, I have a new Elabore grade 2824-2 running +5 seconds a day, with similar numbers on a timegrapher, too.  With little positional variance.  That is very good.

This new watch worked into these #'s within a few weeks of use.  The watch is a Steinhart Ocean Vintage 1.

 

Accurancy is really a measure of how consistant it is.  If your new 2824 is running around ~ +/- 6-8 s/d day WITH CONSISTANCY that is very good for a basic or Elabore grade. 

 

If your watch has the upgraded chronometer grade than +/- 5-6 seconds a day is expected.

 

Keep in mind that a properly set up, regulated and serviced Elabore can give a Chronometer grade a run for its money.

Edited by perpetual92
Link to comment
Share on other sites
clockboy Distinguished Member

clockboy

Posted
Posted

ETA 2824's are very capable of good time consistancy, especially if recently serviced.  They do have a tendency to drop off a bit when needing a service.

For instance, I have a new Elabore grade 2824-2 running +5 seconds a day, with similar numbers on a timegrapher, too.  With little positional variance.  That is very good.

This new watch worked into these #'s within a few weeks of use.  The watch is a Steinhart Ocean Vintage 1.

 

Accurancy is really a measure of how consistant it is.  If your new 2824 is running around ~ +/- 6-8 s/d day WITH CONSISTANCY that is very good for a basic or Elabore grade. 

 

If your watch has the upgraded chronometer grade than +/- 5-6 seconds a day is expected.

 

Keep in mind that a properly set up, regulated and serviced Elabore can give a Chronometer grade a run for its money.

Good response perpetual "accuracy is how constant a watch is". Rolex used to be +/- 3 secs a day, if excellent timekeeping is your real thing then quartz is the movement you require.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
olympus593 New Member

olympus593

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Thank you perpetual92, the numbers pretty much agree with what my watches are running. The only exception is my Squale 1521 which is probably closer to +12 s/d, it is the newest of my collection, have to say it is very consistent so may get it regulated at some point.

Im right in saying getting it regulated is no big deal by a competent watchmaker?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
clockboy Distinguished Member

clockboy

Posted
Posted

Thank you perpetual92, the numbers pretty much agree with what my watches are running. The only exception is my Squale 1521 which is probably closer to +12 s/d, it is the newest of my collection, have to say it is very consistent so may get it regulated at some point.

Im right in saying getting it regulated is no big deal by a competent watchmaker?

If it only needs regulating then yes no big deal but does take a while.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Geo Distinguished Member

Geo

Posted
Posted

Welcome to the forum Olympus, that is good advice given by the guys.

Whatever you do, don't drive yourself insane looking for perfection with a mechanical wristwatch, there is no such thing. If I had a mechanical watch that was running at +12 sec and it was chronometer grade I would think about service, and or adjustment. If it wasn't a chronometer, I'd probably leave as is. Also remember that your watch will have to be ideally timed to you and your everyday movements to get the best result.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
StuartBaker104 Distinguished Member

StuartBaker104

Posted
Posted

Oly593, I assume from your username you are an aviation enthusiast. So to put this subject into perspective, the Olympus 593 engine was controlled by a mechanical computer. This technology has essentially disappeared on modern engines and has been supplanted by digital electronics and software. The reasons for this range through cost, quality, performance, reliability, maintainability and of course accuracy. So why did we love to see the Vulcan fly, and what drove so many people to work on doing that? Passion, emotions, pride, inspiration? Pick your own reasons. With advances in manufacturing and measuring capability, the last few of those old mechanical computers which are still being made have been improved significantly, but mechanisms will always suffer from friction, wear, thermal expansion, etc., so there is a limit.

And so it is with mechanical watches. The quartz watch is a much more accurate timepiece, so why do we love our mechanical watches? Passion, emotions, pride, inspiration? Or is it just like the Vulcan - they make a great noise?

Unless you aspire to be a master watchmaker, as long as you don't have to keep resetting your watch, stop worrying about accuracy and enjoy it for what it means to you. Then as Bob says, buy an old watch, get your screwdrivers out, take apart, rebuild it, and you'll discover that you have a greater tolerance for inaccuracy!

S

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
svorkoetter WRT Addict

svorkoetter

Posted
Posted

FWIW, I have watches with Russian movements (6), Chinese movements (1), Japanese movements (2), and Quartz (2).

 

I regulate all my mechanicals to be within +/-2 to 3 seconds per day, adjusted to my wearing patterns. For instance, my one Chinese movement watch has an instantaneous rate that can vary anywhere between about -2s/d and +8s/d depending on how wound it is, and its orientation, but it averages out to very close to zero with my wearing patterns. I wear it about 16h/d on weekdays and 8h/d on weekends, and it has averaged +0.05s/d since November 1st.

 

So I guess you could say I'm a stickler for accuracy. Anything more than about +5s/d or -1s/d and I'll do something about it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
JohnR725 Distinguished Member

JohnR725

Posted
Posted

One of the things I find amusing with watch accuracy is the difference between what the watch company expects and the owner of the watch expects..

 

So at one time ETA on the same website that lists their technical guides also had the manufacturing information guides. I'm attaching the one for the 2824-2. The guide has all sorts of  interesting information regarding timekeeping  technical specifications etc. which are not found in the normal repair guides.

 

Then there's a little more than just putting a watch on the timing machine one time you also need to check it 24 hours later. The PDF found at the link below has all sorts of nifty calculations other stuff you need if you really want to Know if your Watch is keeping perfect time.

 

http://www.witschi.com/assets/files/sheets/Calculation%20of%20the%20values%20X-D-DVH-Di-Im-N.pdf

ETA-2824-2-Manufacturing-Info-Fr-Gr-En.pdf

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • RichardHarris123
      Hello from Wales, UK.

      By RichardHarris123 · Posted

      At some stage you will have to jump in and have a go. 
    • Neverenoughwatches
      Hello from Wales, UK.

      By Neverenoughwatches · Posted

      Ah so its you thats buying up all the DD calibres 🤨.
    • B1N9S
      Hello from Wales, UK.

      By B1N9S · Posted

      Hi Richard,  I keep buying CAL.59 movements to practice on 🙂 Not started yet though, I'm gathering tools and building my confidence to start.
    • AndrewSi
      No main barrel endshake on Waltham model 1900

      By AndrewSi · Posted

      Problem solved. For some bizarre reason, the hook on the wall of this barrel is not properly centered vertically, but is oddly high on the wall, maybe 3/4 up the way up. When replacing the mainspring, this caused the outer coil to be displaced upwards as well such that it protrudes out of the barrel and caused the barrel lid to not sit quite flush to the barrel. Since this is a motor barrel, the lid is actually the first wheel and inner coil tube/hook all in one piece, with no “snap down” action that would have made the problem more immediately obvious. Maybe with an older mainspring the spring’s end hole was enlarged such that this wasn’t an issue, but hard to say how it ever worked otherwise. Replacing the barrel with one from a different model 1900 where the hook was properly vertically centered allowed the lid to sit flush without mainspring interference and the friction problem went away. The bridge was far too thick to be bent (and isn’t), for those of you thinking that was the problem. Placing the removable arbor in the watch without the rest of the barrel proved that the proper end shake was actually there as long as the overall height of the assembled barrel was correct.
    • Jon
      Mainspring winder question.

      By Jon · Posted

      You are so true on a lot of what you have said. The main reason for changing the mainspring even if the old one is in good order is because it will take out your thinking that the mainspring is contributing to poor power output or fluctuations in amplitude. If a new spring is fitted that box can be crossed off as a potential source of a problem. Most customers are happy to pay the extra £20 for a new mainspring if they are already parting with a couple of hundred pounds for a service. A new spring is an investment for good running for the future.
×
×
  • Create New...