Jump to content

Moisture droplets after L&R, isopropyl etc


Recommended Posts

I recently ran a disassembled movement through L And R #111 Ultrasonic Waterless Watch Cleaning and #3 Watch Rinsing Solution and have also been using lighter fluid Onedip and IPA to try get this thing spotless....

But I am noticing moisture droplets not evaporating at room temp.... visible under the microscope

I am not clear, but suspect not having a high enough percentage IPA could be a culprit...

But do the cleaners absorb ambient moisture over time? I have them in mason jars, and some glass jars with plastic lids.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, JeremyLaurenson said:

I recently ran a disassembled movement through L And R #111 Ultrasonic Waterless Watch Cleaning and #3 Watch Rinsing Solution and have also been using lighter fluid Onedip and IPA to try get this thing spotless....

But I am noticing moisture droplets not evaporating at room temp.... visible under the microscope

I am not clear, but suspect not having a high enough percentage IPA could be a culprit...

But do the cleaners absorb ambient moisture over time? I have them in mason jars, and some glass jars with plastic lids.

 

You think these droplets are water ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The cleaning solutions are water free and do not absorb moisture. Check the concentration of your IPA. It needs to be 99% and not the medical grade 70%.

Are you using a rotary watch cleaning machine or an ultrasonic cleaner?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This was discussed in another thread. The droplets you see are the less volatile fraction of the cleaning fluids and dissolved oils. A small amount of fluid is trapped in the holes of the jewels when it is taken out of the fluid and when it is left to dry, it appears in a flower pattern around the holes.

It doesn't happen when you use a rotary cleaning maching because at the end of each cycle, the basket is spun at high speeds to spin off any trapped fluids.

My mentor uses an ultrasonic cleaner only but at the end of cleaning, he leaves the basket on a temperature controlled heating pad, set at 60°C, for about 30mins. And he has no issues.

I also use an ultrasonic cleaner but I spin my baskets for a minute after every cycle. This also recovers about 2cc of cleaning solution, which would otherwise be lost or goes into the next jar and contaminate the rinse solutions down the line.

Edited by HectorLooi
Typo
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, JeremyLaurenson said:

having a high enough percentage IPA could be a culprit

repeating what others have said you need the highest proof alcohol which is 99 as opposed to the rubbing alcohol which has water

3 hours ago, JeremyLaurenson said:

When putting parts onto watch paper and waiting for the IPA/Rinse to evaporate from the paper essentially 30 minutes later I still see the moisture.

preferred thing rather than letting it sit around to evaporate would be a source of warm air. It's amazing how well things dry when you can elevate the temperature and blow air across them.

then just for clarification sake in what order he do you clean things you have it in the cleaner for how long then here is exactly how many cleaning rinse cycles how long for each and how long them alcohol before you air dry which as I said isn't really what you want to be doing.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

preferred thing rather than letting it sit around to evaporate would be a source of warm air. It's amazing how well things dry when you can elevate the temperature and blow air across them.

I use a simple hair dryer to blow hot air on the parts after the final IPA rinse.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, mikepilk said:

I use a simple hair dryer to blow hot air on the parts after the final IPA rinse.

when I was cleaning watches at home that is exactly what I used to do. The only minor problem I had the first hairdryer worked perfectly the temperature was nice. but the second one was rather intense and I felt the temperature was much too hot. So then I got creative and modified a coffee can elevated the area that I put the watches in move the hairdryer back a little bit so it wasn't quite as hot and I usually put something on top not covering hundred percent but allowing it to get nice and warm and it works really well.

image.png.dce6d73c08fce38c968ebd455e5ca96c.png

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Keep the IPA in a sealed glass  container. IPA absorbs water rather quickly, the plastic containers the drugstores sell IPA in allow water intrusion.  
I used to work with high dollar optics and we used pump dispensers for the solvents.  We found that we needed to change out IPA every 3 hours to control the water contamination.  Extreme for watch cleaning, but opened my eyes to  what can happen to solvents.  

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Aloha All, I recently bought this Seitz tool on eBay, but it is missing some pushers reamers.  I ended up ordering new parts for those that were missing before I received the actual Seitz tool (bad idea).   Upon inspecting the pushers/bits, I noticed 23 of the 56 provided with the set had no numbers. Further inspection revealed a huge difference in the quality of those unnumbered.  Do all Seitz pushers/bits have a number on them?  I'm pretty sure that 33 of the 56 I received are cheap Chinese knockoffs.  The worst part is that I ordered $80 of parts to replace the missing pushers/bits, and now I'm looking to return the tool. I'm not crazy, right? If these are Seitz parts, they should all be numbered, correct? The first two pictures are the Seitz (numbered), and the other pictures are the suspect parts.  Will I even be able to get a refund?  Thanks, Frank     
    • It was £10 + min fee, total £16, could not leave it there. Its a Stanton A.D.2. http://stanton-instruments.co.uk/
    • Chief- The picture below shows the three parts from the dial side that are most useful to "fingerprint" a movement in conjunction with the diameter of the movement.  That's why forum participants are always asking for dial side photos in posts asking for identification.  As far as the setting lever screw, it actually sits loose in the main plate. The threads engage the setting lever below, and the elongated stem above the shoulder sticks through a hole in one of the bridge plates so that it's held captive if unscrewed all the way.  So you may be fine as far as that goes. 
    • So I found what I believe is the setting lever screw! Am I right in thinking the screw next to the click is the correct one for the setting lever? However if it is, it doesn't fit in the hole which I believe is for it! I can get the lever to sit nicely on the stem and line up with a hole, but the screw only goes as far as the shoulder and stops. It's as though the hole is too small! The dial side has been disassembled by the way, the other wheels are in my tray
    • When faced with say a pocket watch bridge which is cracked, silver soldering to repair is often the only option (hopefully someone wasn't there before hand with soft solder). I can generally do this succesfully and tidily with a small torch and miniscule pieces of silver solder, but on parts which were mercury amalgam gilded the heat can have have a deleterious effect on the finish.   I keep wondering if there's a good way to refinish these - and despite having the needful items would rather avoid using the mercury process.   In the past for electronic work I've gold plated PCBs but this involved gold potassium cyanide solution, which also doesn't realy belong at home. I've read that there are now safer alternatives but couldn't find more detail (and importantly how similar are the results to amalgam gilding, since I wouldn't want to refinish the whole watch). Pointers would be very welcome (and yes, I know solutions containing gold won't be cheap!) Alan
×
×
  • Create New...