Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hey guys I'm new to fixing watches. I need some help or advice with fixing my Seiko 4633. I believe the issue lies with the step rotor here's the piece I'm referring to (https://www.ebay.com/itm/162543866751). Whenever I put the battery in, the second hand just barely goes back and forth and I think the root cause is the step rotor "jumping" out of its seat. Taking it apart and putting the battery in I saw that it jumps out about halfway and then barely rotates back and forth. Any advice?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi welcome to the forum,   It might just be a piece of dirt in the train or even gummed up oil in either case requires servicing, but before we run that road a few checks.  Put a little drop and I mean a little on the bearings for the train, if it’s sticky oil this will thin it temporarily, if it# dirt put it on a line release tool ( plenty on eBay) and spin the train and hands round. If that’s successful put on a battery and test. If that fails may be the coil or circuit board faulty.  Depending on the watch might be cheaper replacing the movement but that requires some tools and a modicum of skill.

post picture# of the watch movement front and back for further help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jojo said:

Hey guys I'm new to fixing watches. I need some help or advice with fixing my Seiko 4633. I believe the issue lies with the step rotor here's the piece I'm referring to (https://www.ebay.com/itm/162543866751). Whenever I put the battery in, the second hand just barely goes back and forth and I think the root cause is the step rotor "jumping" out of its seat. Taking it apart and putting the battery in I saw that it jumps out about halfway and then barely rotates back and forth. Any advice?

Pretty sure the step rotor does not go back and forth, it should revolve around continuously in its bearing, turning at every magnetic activation of the stator. The rotor is the basically the driveshaft of the train, the equivalent of the barrel in a mechanical watch. If you are correct and it is jumping out of it seating then its pivot is either broken or the pivot bearing is damaged, the bridge is loose or the rotor has started to disintegrate. 

2 minutes ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

Pretty sure the step rotor does not go back and forth, it should revolve around continuously in its bearing, turning at every magnetic activation of the stator. The rotor is the basically the driveshaft of the train, the equivalent of the barrel in a mechanical watch. If you are correct and it is jumping out of it seating then its pivot is either broken or the pivot bearing is damaged, the bridge is loose or the rotor has started to disintegrate. 

A picture of the rotor and its adjacent parts would be in order really.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, jojo said:

Hey guys I'm new to fixing watches. I need some help or advice with fixing my Seiko 4633. I believe the issue lies with the step rotor here's the piece I'm referring to (https://www.ebay.com/itm/162543866751). Whenever I put the battery in, the second hand just barely goes back and forth and I think the root cause is the step rotor "jumping" out of its seat. Taking it apart and putting the battery in I saw that it jumps out about halfway and then barely rotates back and forth. Any advice?

So here the pin and the watch open, maybe I'm making a newbie mistake but the gif explains the second-hand movement when I put the cover back on, the only other issue I can think of is that I don't have the plus terminal B of battery connection, I only have plus terminal A. 

 seiko step motor.jpg

 

step rotor movement gif.gif

seiko schem.png

Edited by jojo
more context
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi. The rotor or step motor receives pulses from the bloc as a square wave form , posative and negative. This causes the rotor to turn for each pulse received at one per second intervals. So as the rotor part steps would lead me to think there is a blockage within the train,  so clean/ service the movement lubricate and re try. Unless you have or have access to a scope or a meter to be able to monitor the pulses  it will be dificult to diagnose other than changing parts. Ie. Coil and bloc.  With a meter  on the coil contacts . Be careful of the thin wires.  You should see the meter needle deflect for each pulse.  There are cheap devices# on eBay that will do this as well as a few other things. But first service the watch to eliminate dirt and oil problems then there will be a need to dig deeper.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, watchweasol said:

Hi. The rotor or step motor receives pulses from the bloc as a square wave form , posative and negative. This causes the rotor to turn for each pulse received at one per second intervals. So as the rotor part steps would lead me to think there is a blockage within the train,  so clean/ service the movement lubricate and re try. Unless you have or have access to a scope or a meter to be able to monitor the pulses  it will be dificult to diagnose other than changing parts. Ie. Coil and bloc.  With a meter  on the coil contacts . Be careful of the thin wires.  You should see the meter needle deflect for each pulse.  There are cheap devices# on eBay that will do this as well as a few other things. But first service the watch to eliminate dirt and oil problems then there will be a need to dig deeper.

I would say the cleaning and lubrication has more effect here in a quartz watch than in a mechanical watch. The train is much smaller, the torque must be less. An amount of dirt and debris will stop a quartz train sooner than a mechanical train although the hairspring of mechanical is more susceptible .

17 hours ago, jojo said:

So here the pin and the watch open, maybe I'm making a newbie mistake but the gif explains the second-hand movement when I put the cover back on, the only other issue I can think of is that I don't have the plus terminal B of battery connection, I only have plus terminal A. 

 seiko step motor.jpg

 

step rotor movement gif.gif

seiko schem.png

What was the jumping out of it's seat rotor problem ?  Did it just look that way ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Twitching of the rotor could be due to mechanical or electrical problems 

Do a complete disassembly clean the pivots and peg the jewel holes. Check that the coil resistance is correct. Check pcb for oxidation and corrosion.

Fit only the rotor and check that it is able to rotate 360°.

If it is ok, then do a complete assembly and oil. I use Moebius 9000 for the gear train.

Edited by HectorLooi
Typo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/4/2024 at 9:45 PM, jojo said:

 Whenever I put the battery in, the second hand just barely goes back and forth 

This indicates good electric circuit in the coil.

Now that its partially disassembled you might as well fully disassemble/ clean/ check all holes/ pivots/ gears.... 

If you don't have moebius 9000 , any light watch oil will do.

When the rotor is loose on bench like you show in picture , it will attract bits of metal.

Rgds

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've got a Heuer 1000 with an ESA 563.121 movement that is doing the same. I've just got it on the bench tomorrow so haven't worked on it yet, but after I've electrically tested it I'm going to strip it and find the problem. The very fact that the second hand is jumping back and forth by a quarter of a second indicates power is getting through the coil and PCB. I'm guessing it is a problem with the rotor, as the gear train feels pretty free to me and turns easily. I use Moebius 9030 to oil quartz movements, but anything with a low viscosity will work. if you only have 9010 that'll work, but 'ghost oil' the train. So, this is barely oiling the gear train jewel with the littlest amount of oil possible. Cartier doesn't even oil the train at all, as there is so little torque they feel it is needed, which in some respects is true.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • At some stage you will have to jump in and have a go. 
    • Ah so its you thats buying up all the DD calibres 🤨.
    • Hi Richard,  I keep buying CAL.59 movements to practice on 🙂 Not started yet though, I'm gathering tools and building my confidence to start.
    • Problem solved. For some bizarre reason, the hook on the wall of this barrel is not properly centered vertically, but is oddly high on the wall, maybe 3/4 up the way up. When replacing the mainspring, this caused the outer coil to be displaced upwards as well such that it protrudes out of the barrel and caused the barrel lid to not sit quite flush to the barrel. Since this is a motor barrel, the lid is actually the first wheel and inner coil tube/hook all in one piece, with no “snap down” action that would have made the problem more immediately obvious. Maybe with an older mainspring the spring’s end hole was enlarged such that this wasn’t an issue, but hard to say how it ever worked otherwise. Replacing the barrel with one from a different model 1900 where the hook was properly vertically centered allowed the lid to sit flush without mainspring interference and the friction problem went away. The bridge was far too thick to be bent (and isn’t), for those of you thinking that was the problem. Placing the removable arbor in the watch without the rest of the barrel proved that the proper end shake was actually there as long as the overall height of the assembled barrel was correct.
    • You are so true on a lot of what you have said. The main reason for changing the mainspring even if the old one is in good order is because it will take out your thinking that the mainspring is contributing to poor power output or fluctuations in amplitude. If a new spring is fitted that box can be crossed off as a potential source of a problem. Most customers are happy to pay the extra £20 for a new mainspring if they are already parting with a couple of hundred pounds for a service. A new spring is an investment for good running for the future.
×
×
  • Create New...