Jump to content

More you tube mayhem.


Recommended Posts

15 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

I typically do not watch watch repair videos when I come home almost anything but that

 

That would be like me coming home from work and watching a video of a guy hanging a door bady or laying bricks the wrong way round . 😅

20 hours ago, HectorLooi said:

If I remember correctly, Blu-tack came out in the seventies. What did you use prior to that?

I read somewhere that the Waltham factory tasked a lady to make a batch of dough every morning and that was used like Rodico.

Maybe @Neverenoughwatches would like to make his own Rodico. Any extra can be used for making chapati.

Hey Hector , i made some dough strips for dry cleaning . Thanks the tip it works amazingly 👍

20231221_231102.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/20/2023 at 4:02 PM, oldhippy said:

As I'm one of the old buggers that never used finger cots I always used Radico, always handled parts with tweezers and I couldn't get on using watch mainspring winders. I learned how to put a spring in its barrel without touching the spring by using tissue paper. I expect now I'll be sent to Coventry for the rest of my time on this forum. 🤣 Happy Christmas.  

I guess I'm another old bugger.  I must have gorilla hands; all the cots I've tried were so tight as to be almost painful.

I've invested in good tweezers, good screwdrivers, good pin vices and tool holders, and good movement holders.  Even before cleaning, I touch the parts as little as possible, and after cleaning - not at all.  I will put on cots if I cannot do something without finger-manipulation, but I've been practicing with my tweezers and I believe I'm getting pretty good.  Learning to dress them right helps also.

But I do have a K&D winder that I like very much.  And I always have the Rodico close by.  And I know how to oil these things.  So I am hoping for a measure of absolution too.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe this is a better way to use your rodico or dry cleaning dough. Pegwood in a retractable pencil, drill a 1mm hole in the end of the pegwood and push in your dough. After you've wiped off the excess the pocket of air pressure built up in the hole slightly pushes out a bump of dough,great for picking up jewels . 😄

20231221_231102.jpg

20231221_234318.jpg

20231221_234134.jpg

30 minutes ago, KarlvonKoln said:

I guess I'm another old bugger.  I must have gorilla hands; all the cots I've tried were so tight as to be almost painful.

I've invested in good tweezers, good screwdrivers, good pin vices and tool holders, and good movement holders.  Even before cleaning, I touch the parts as little as possible, and after cleaning - not at all.  I will put on cots if I cannot do something without finger-manipulation, but I've been practicing with my tweezers and I believe I'm getting pretty good.  Learning to dress them right helps also.

But I do have a K&D winder that I like very much.  And I always have the Rodico close by.  And I know how to oil these things.  So I am hoping for a measure of absolution too.

Thats exactly what ive been doing for the last 18 months, i hate cots for the same reason and only wear them when i cant find a way not to. I even sandwich the dial and movement between two pieces of sponge when putting the dial screws in.

17032028520134465588060761081115.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

i made some dough strips for dry cleaning . Thanks the tip it works amazingly

So, what kind of dough did you make? Plain flour and water? Any olive oil, salt or baking soda? Plain flour, bread flour, wholemeal or low GI!

With all the silliness going on, I can't tell if you are serious or just being silly. Now poor Ross will be in his kitchen making up a batch of dough. 

Just another tip, cockroaches and rats love raw dough. So you'll need to keep your homemade Rodico in an airtight container. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, HectorLooi said:

So, what kind of dough did you make? Plain flour and water? Any olive oil, salt or baking soda? Plain flour, bread flour, wholemeal or low GI!

With all the silliness going on, I can't tell if you are serious or just being silly. Now poor Ross will be in his kitchen making up a batch of dough. 

Just another tip, cockroaches and rats love raw dough. So you'll need to keep your homemade Rodico in an airtight container. 

Strong bread flour i made mini fruit loafs with crushed pistachio nuts ready for morning , you need more gluten content for bread. At 57 years old I've never seen a cockroach not that many rats either. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, KarlvonKoln said:

I guess I'm another old bugger.  I must have gorilla hands; all the cots I've tried were so tight as to be almost painful.

I've invested in good tweezers, good screwdrivers, good pin vices and tool holders, and good movement holders.  Even before cleaning, I touch the parts as little as possible, and after cleaning - not at all.  I will put on cots if I cannot do something without finger-manipulation, but I've been practicing with my tweezers and I believe I'm getting pretty good.  Learning to dress them right helps also.

But I do have a K&D winder that I like very much.  And I always have the Rodico close by.  And I know how to oil these things.  So I am hoping for a measure of absolution too.

Exactly. 

The majority of work can be done with tools only (tweezers, movement holder, pegwood...). 

I personally work without cots about 60% of the time (I could push it to 90%). BUT when I work without, I do NOT touch the movement at all -- absolutely nowhere and never.  For assembly, I tend to wear cots just to be safe, but I tend to not touch the movement with them either. Some people (Youtubers..) use cots that seem to have been used a 100 times, are filthy and may equally spread dirt and oils. Work surfaces also need to be clean (the video that started the thread is a great example of how it shouldn't be). I also dip my tweezers and other tools into Rodico regularly.

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am definately a newbie. That said, I watch YouTube videos for 3 main reasons. The first is for learning such as Mark's videos or Alex Hamilton's or others with tutorials on specific topics. The second is to look for a specific caliber that I may be servicing or have in my collection. The third is for the ASMR effect where it relaxes me to view servicing of a watch. However, it sounds like in this case none of those 3 reasons would have me watching the video _ YouTube r mentioned in this thread. As an aside to the finger cot discussion, my understanding they are only for the thumb, index and middle fingers of the non dominant hand and the dominant hand is for tools and should not need to touch the movement. No matter what the profession you learn standard practices and always implement them, otherwise you are lazy, have no attention to detail and won't be working on my project.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Knebo said:

Exactly. 

The majority of work can be done with tools only (tweezers, movement holder, pegwood...). 

I personally work without cots about 60% of the time (I could push it to 90%). BUT when I work without, I do NOT touch the movement at all -- absolutely nowhere and never.  For assembly, I tend to wear cots just to be safe, but I tend to not touch the movement with them either. Some people (Youtubers..) use cots that seem to have been used a 100 times, are filthy and may equally spread dirt and oils. Work surfaces also need to be clean (the video that started the thread is a great example of how it shouldn't be). I also dip my tweezers and other tools into Rodico regularly.

 

I wear finger cots for nearly the entire duration of working on a watch, but I've recently realized (albeit it a bit late) that I need to replace the cots at more regular intervals.  I do not have the luxury of working in a perfectly clean environment (but I try my best to keep my workspace clean), and my finger cots can gather some bits of dust, etc. during the process.  It is something I'll be more conscious of moving forward. 

Edited by thor447
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, HectorLooi said:

I know I went into the kitchen to make a test batch of dough for homemade Rodico.

One thing led to another and this turned out instead....

20231223_091700.thumb.jpg.f9603cc5e28fafeac174f384da74b746.jpg

They look a bit like twigglets, i can see those sesame seeds getting lodged somewhere in the train or escapement 😁.  Confession time !!!   Haha yes i know I'm a bugger, the fruit loafs were good though 🙂.

1703364951725273809581876276431.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/21/2023 at 8:07 PM, Malocchio said:

I have some cheap cots from Cousins

Cheap is, as cheap does! If you buy some Bergeon or another known brand finger cot the result is obvious compared to something like Anchor finger cots, which should be thrown in the bin. If you prefer nitrile gloves, go for it. I don't like my whole hand sweating inside a glove, as I'm using cots for eight to ten hours a day and regularly take them off to let my fingers breathe.

I use Bergeon black finger cots. Large ones for three of my fingers on my left hand and an extra large for my thumb, as the large ones fell a little tight on my thumb. I don't like wearing finger cots on my right hand I use for screwdrivers and tweezers, as I don't have the tactile feel of the tool and generally don't handle parts with that hand

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Jon said:

Cheap is, as cheap does! 

I suspected that but the price was so tempting. I'll have a try with Bergeons next time I order something. They're more expensive but I don't need them really that often, only when working on dial, glass and mainspring. I use carbon tweezers and pegwood when I need to handle other bigger parts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Good morning,   To be honest, I'm not sure I trust my own logic anymore 😅. But here's a picture of my own (failed!) attempt to install a new rotor axle. I punched way to hard and even split the metal of the rotor. My thinking was that, in my case, the axle sits "deeper" in the rotor and hence the rotor would be closer to the movement plates. Vice versa, I was thinking that a very light punch could cause the rotor to sit rather high. But not sure that makes sense because in both cases, the flat part of the axle and the rotor align equally.     Sorry, but is he saying that the outside of the caseback has been polished to such an extent that the inside of the caseback has deformed/sunk??? That sounds crazy to me because those casebacks are thick! Can you see any signs of that on the inside of the caseback? Have you tried screwing in the caseback a litte bit more or less so that the supposedly "sunk" part of the caseback would move from 9 o'clock to e.g. 6/7 or 11/12 o'clock?  If the caseback is truly deformed, maybe it could be punched/pressed back into shape (e.g. with glass/caseback closing press).      I agree with your choice. But yea, Rolex makes it VERY hard for independent watchmakers to do a perfect job because we can't get (original) parts easily.      Your pictures aren't too bad. But still impossible to see if the rotor isn't perfectly flat. You'd have to look at it with your loupe, from the side (like the pictures), and turn the rotor to see if the gaps (with the automatic bridge plates) increase/decrease.     Finally... how is the up/down play of the rotor? To test, take a toothpick/pegwood and press on the small triangular side of the rotor next to the axle (NOT the big side where the weight is. But the opposite side.). Does that lift up the weight-side of the rotor? There can be some play, but it should really be minimal. If there's too much play, a new spring clip is the first thing to do. After that, one could play around with the jewels. This is too much:
    • could start a new sub-brand: Bergeon-Pro Worked for Apple phones! Ah they already beat me to it:  
    • Hello, those RR pocket watches are nice watches, there are still parts around...
    • The hairspring looks to be in good condition from the photographs, it is natural that the balance will perform slightly differently in different orientations. Assuming there is no damage, the difference may be caused by the balance moving relative to the jewels, not the hairspring itself. So too much space between the jewels (endshake) and the difference will be greater, if one jewel is oiled and the other not, then again a lower amplitude in one position than the other....and so on. If the difference is reasonable (like your 13 seconds) the the best thing to do is to make one position slightly fast (+7 seconds, and the other position slow -7 seconds) then this averaging of the error will make for a more accurate watch in use. If the difference was much greater eg 100 seconds, then you would need to troubleshoot the problem. Additionally, you need to let the watch run-in for 24-48 hours after a service to allow the new oils to work their way in to all the jewels and pivots etc before you make a 'real' timegrapher test, otherwise you can get strange results. For example the oil in the top shock setting may be evenly spread, but not (yet) in the bottom setting = high difference.... after 24 hours this oil will probably have sorted itself out and the difference may be much better.
    • Oy! No bad words in our forum please.
×
×
  • Create New...