Jump to content

Seitz vs Chinese alternatives


clockboy

Recommended Posts

I normally do not post vids from other watch guys who regularly post on YouTube. However this particular subject is often debated on this forum. Do Chinese tools offer a viable alternative such as the Seitz jeweling tool vs the Chinese copy of a Horta jeweling tool. I have known the answer for a while I recommend watching this:
 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CIqQcVLgtB0

Edited by clockboy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, clockboy said:

I normally do not post vids from other watch guys who regularly post on YouTube. However this particular subject is often debated on this forum. Do Chinese tools offer a viable alternative such as the Seitz jeweling tool vs the Chinese copy of a Horta jeweling tool. I have known the answer for a while I recommend watching this:
 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CIqQcVLgtB0

Watched this a few days ago, quite interesting, a couple of things i didn't know about the seitz, like the accessory to make it into a screw micrometer press without the lever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

Watched this a few days ago, quite interesting, a couple of things i didn't know about the seitz, like the accessory to make it into a screw micrometer press without the lever.

My Seitz tool doesn’t even have a micrometer at all. I think I will still get a horia clone.

 

Tom

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, oldhippy said:

I don't need to watch the video to see which is best. I know and I had the Seitz complete set. I was given to me by my master when he retired. 

🤔 you know when you retire OH, what might you be doing with your tools ? 😉

26 minutes ago, tomh207 said:

My Seitz tool doesn’t even have a micrometer at all. I think I will still get a horia clone.

 

Tom

How old is it ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, oldhippy said:

I retired from watch & clock making years ago due to poor health. I sold most of my tools and all the parts I had at that time, I wish now I still had it all, but I would need a bigger home or a very large workshop to keep it all in. 

Thats a shame, especially if you still enjoyed it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I watched the video when it was first published and to be honest I thought his criticism of the clone was a little pointless, a comparison between the clone and a genuine horia would have far more beneficial.

As it was it was just another look how my 2 grand tool is better than this rubbish 100 bucks tool

It's not rocket science or brain surgery to work out which is better, just more of the money is no object brigade showing off how much they spend. We see enough of that on here already.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

Thats a shame, especially if you still enjoyed it.

I get my fix by helping the members out on this wonderful site. I'm still learning new things on here all the time and I was working on high grade clocks mostly for nearly 30 years. 

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the Horia clone is the best bang for buck you can get. I use Seitz cannon pinion bits for cannon pinion and seconds hand tightening. For reaming I got a used Seitz frame and new reamers separately. Horia is better for tightening purposes since you can pre-tighten the part between jaws and then turn sideways to inspect under a microscope. I didn't know about the micrometer attachment for Seitz. I wonder if they're ever available.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Welcome! To which part of India will my greetings go? Frank
    • I agree with @Waggy, no need to adjust. That looks very good to me. The factory specs for 7S26 are something like -35 to +45s/day, but they are usually better. The amplitude is good. When wearing, the most important positions are dial up, crown down and crown left. You need to regulate so that these positions average out to about zero. Crown down is showing +14, so you may have to set dial up to slightly minus s/day. The absolute values of +/-s/day don't really matter, as long as they aren't too far out. The only way to get good accuracy is to wear it for a couple of days, recording the errors, and gradually tweaking.
    • @Jon The link is no longer working and I wanted to see that demonstration again. Is there any chance you can make it available again? I'd appreciate it!
    • Or, if you have a staking set or jewelling too, just use one of the stumps. You can choose a fine tip to fit inside a jewel if necessary.
    • Good morning,   To be honest, I'm not sure I trust my own logic anymore 😅. But here's a picture of my own (failed!) attempt to install a new rotor axle. I punched way to hard and even split the metal of the rotor. My thinking was that, in my case, the axle sits "deeper" in the rotor and hence the rotor would be closer to the movement plates. Vice versa, I was thinking that a very light punch could cause the rotor to sit rather high. But not sure that makes sense because in both cases, the flat part of the axle and the rotor align equally.     Sorry, but is he saying that the outside of the caseback has been polished to such an extent that the inside of the caseback has deformed/sunk??? That sounds crazy to me because those casebacks are thick! Can you see any signs of that on the inside of the caseback? Have you tried screwing in the caseback a litte bit more or less so that the supposedly "sunk" part of the caseback would move from 9 o'clock to e.g. 6/7 or 11/12 o'clock?  If the caseback is truly deformed, maybe it could be punched/pressed back into shape (e.g. with glass/caseback closing press).      I agree with your choice. But yea, Rolex makes it VERY hard for independent watchmakers to do a perfect job because we can't get (original) parts easily.      Your pictures aren't too bad. But still impossible to see if the rotor isn't perfectly flat. You'd have to look at it with your loupe, from the side (like the pictures), and turn the rotor to see if the gaps (with the automatic bridge plates) increase/decrease.     Finally... how is the up/down play of the rotor? To test, take a toothpick/pegwood and press on the small triangular side of the rotor next to the axle (NOT the big side where the weight is. But the opposite side.). Does that lift up the weight-side of the rotor? There can be some play, but it should really be minimal. If there's too much play, a new spring clip is the first thing to do. After that, one could play around with the jewels. This is too much:
×
×
  • Create New...