Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi all

i have a few eta251.262 which I have serviced for a couple of projects but having checked the coils I havev found that I need at least 5 and they are not cheap at £12 each. My question is are these coils particularly fragile I am surprised I have so many defective ones. And does anyone no of a cheaper alternative as I would almost be better off buying a new movement. Thanks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Specializedjim said:

Hi all

i have a few eta251.262 which I have serviced for a couple of projects but having checked the coils I havev found that I need at least 5 and they are not cheap at £12 each. My question is are these coils particularly fragile I am surprised I have so many defective ones. And does anyone no of a cheaper alternative as I would almost be better off buying a new movement. Thanks. 

Yes the coils are fragile, most coils from quality movements have a lacquer on them some a thicker protective coating. How did you test them ? There can be many faults in a quartz watch. More often than not the ones I've tinkered with it was the silicone chip that had failed. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Update!!! So I managed to get hold of a good coil and fitted to a movement that was missing just one with all of the others working. Fitted the battery and now two other wheels were not working. Removed those coils and they have both now failed. Can someone tell me what I am doing wrong. They were both working before and the movement has been well stored and I haven’t touched them before refitting the battery. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Specializedjim said:

Update!!! So I managed to get hold of a good coil and fitted to a movement that was missing just one with all of the others working. Fitted the battery and now two other wheels were not working. Removed those coils and they have both now failed. Can someone tell me what I am doing wrong. They were both working before and the movement has been well stored and I haven’t touched them before refitting the battery. 

I wonder is something shorting them out, your tester maybe ?  I am surprised how many have failed, something faulty with the design of the module. Out of the few hundred or so quartz movements that i have stripped down very few had a broken coil.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

I wonder is something shorting them out, your tester maybe ?  I am surprised how many have failed, something faulty with the design of the module. Out of the few hundred or so quartz movements that i have stripped down very few had a broken coil.

Usually most quartz coils are damaged by external influences. In other words that's really tiny wire and you don't want anything touching the coil. Typically when batteries are being changed people's lap and scratch the coil. Or when checking for coil resistance you want to keep away from where the wires touch the circuit board in fact you want to stay a far away as you can because if you touch in the wrong place that is a bad external influence a you probably break the coil.

So no typically coils do not fail at a super high rate not without help. Usually the downfall of quartz watches is the lubrication goes bad with time and or External influence again of dirt and debris getting in the watchmen somebody changes the battery. Gaskets that fail moisture gets in the battery leaks that can get all over the place. Depending upon the age and if it's ever been serviced poor lubrication practices were oil can get sticky very sticky. I was doing a Seiko's ladies watch once and lifted up the plate and all the gears were stuck to the plate that would be an example of poor lubrication practices.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hi nickelsilver, thanks for the great explanation and the links! I'll take a good look in the article.  Especially this is great news to hear! Looking through forums and youtube videos I was informed to 'fist find a case and then fit a movement for it'. But seems that's not the case for pocket watches at least?  I guess I should be looking to find some 'male square bench keys' for now. I was thinking of winding the mainspring using a screwdriver directly, but I found a thread that you've replied on, saying that it could damage the spring. 
    • Murks, The rate and amplitude look OK, and the amplitude should improve once the oils you have used get a chance to move bed-in, also I notice that you are using default 52 degrees for the lift angle, if you get the real lift angle (assuming it's not actually 52) this will change your amplitude - maybe higher, maybe lower. I notice that the beat error is a little high, but not crazy high. At the risk of upsetting the purists, if the balance has an adjustment arm I would go ahead and try and get this <0.3 ms, but if it does not have an adjustable arm then I would probably leave well alone. Just my opinion.
    • Hi everyone on my timegrapher it showing this do a make anymore adjustment someone let me know ?    
    • Maybe I'm over simplifying this and I'm a little late to the discussion, but just by my looking at oil when I use it on a treated cap jewel  the oil stays in one nice bubble, but when I don't it spreads out to the edges of the jewel. I'm not sure (but could well be wrong) but the analogy of a waxed car and rain is accurate in this case, the wax is very hydrophobic and repels the water, however, the process epilame works by is a different physical process based upon cohesion/adhesion (oleophilic) not repulsion (oleophobic)  at least as far as I have read/observed. If one were to use a oleophobic substance equivalent to wax (hydrophobic) then one would need to create a donut shape to fence in the oil, however if one used such a strategy with a epilame which is oleophilic then the oil would sit on the ring of the donut and not in the 'donut hole', exactly where you don't want it. Even if the oil is smeared then the oleophilic epilame should pull it back to the center (see diagram below). Reference For interest the chemical in epilame is 2-(PERFLUOROHEXYL) ETHYL METHACRYLATE, CAS NO: 2144-53-8
    • Looks lint the teeth on the hour wheel aren't meshing with the teeth on the calendar intermediate wheel, maybe the hour wheel is sitting on top of this instead of meshing?        
×
×
  • Create New...