Jump to content

What do you think of this clock?


oldhippy

Recommended Posts

I haven't done a competition in long time. So as the headline says. What do you think of this clock. The winner with the best answer wins a peanut. 

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/115896092912?mkevt=1&mkpid=0&emsid=e11021.m5057.l9429&mkcid=7&ch=osgood&euid=3236060721db4588875f02d6d29f04e4&bu=43419297739&ut=RU&osub=-1~1&crd=20230824013836&segname=11021

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd buy it, but only because I was curious.  It looks rather like somebody found a hand-crafted movement that they really liked - and they wanted to cram it into the first decent (and slightly more modern) case they came across, to both protect it and put it to use.  And then discovered that the doggone pendulum hangs so low that it'll just sit on the bottom and not move.  So they got out some wood gouges and carved a little trough for the pendulum to swing in.  Then they got worried they'd forget how to work the clock so they pasted some hand-written instructions inside.  
But other than that, it looks okay  🙂

Addendum: that movement looks really old, even on closer inspection of the pictures, but with limited clock knowledge I couldn't say how old.  I still think the case is a bit newer, and very likely not originally made for this movement.  It seems like an unhappy marriage.  Poor thing.

Edited by KarlvonKoln
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, oldhippy said:

I haven't done a competition in long time. So as the headline says. What do you think of this clock. The winner with the best answer wins a peanut. 

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/115896092912?mkevt=1&mkpid=0&emsid=e11021.m5057.l9429&mkcid=7&ch=osgood&euid=3236060721db4588875f02d6d29f04e4&bu=43419297739&ut=RU&osub=-1~1&crd=20230824013836&segname=11021

What an excellent choice, brilliant and intuitive, I love it, now may I have a peanut?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It kinda, sorta, looks, almost like what it pretends to  be, but I've seen better reproductions. For example. 

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/145216604291?chn=ps&norover=1&mkevt=1&mkrid=7101533165274578&mkcid=2&itemid=145216604291&targetid=4585169652812023&device=c&mktype=&googleloc=&poi=&campaignid=412354547&mkgroupid=1305120599331881&rlsatarget=pla-4585169652812023&abcId=9300541&merchantid=87779&msclkid=b06d41843dcc192b07e4256cb967727e

Now I have to be really clear here, am I in line to win a packing peanut or the seed of a subtropical legume? Its important, because I'm allergic to packing peanuts, they bring me out in a cold sweat every time I end up accidentally spilling them all over the floor. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Certainly is an odd ball. The movement looks old but the plates are riveted not pinned the pillars look plain although not seen clearly enough to determine. Plain unmarked plate good thickness, ?   Age again unless you get your hands on it for a close inspection I would. Not guess, the escapement cock looks hand made .     The case seems to be over the top for such a movement. And the fact that the case has been altered to accommodate the pendulum and still looks short of any adjustment as the bob looks to be touching the bottom.  Price wise over the top for what looks like a Franken clock.  Indeterminate origin,  not for me . Too many ifs and buts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, AndyHull said:

It kinda, sorta, looks, almost like what it pretends to  be, but I've seen better reproductions. For example. 

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/145216604291?chn=ps&norover=1&mkevt=1&mkrid=7101533165274578&mkcid=2&itemid=145216604291&targetid=4585169652812023&device=c&mktype=&googleloc=&poi=&campaignid=412354547&mkgroupid=1305120599331881&rlsatarget=pla-4585169652812023&abcId=9300541&merchantid=87779&msclkid=b06d41843dcc192b07e4256cb967727e

Now I have to be really clear here, am I in line to win a packing peanut or the seed of a subtropical legume? Its important, because I'm allergic to packing peanuts, they bring me out in a cold sweat every time I end up accidentally spilling them all over the floor. 

I can rarely get the laughing thumbs up to work, and couldn't this time either, but dangit that was funny!!🤣😂😅 I get hostile about it, and they do next to no good in the first place! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, watchweasol said:

There are two winding arbours at the front but only one has a bearing in the back plate! ..? …

The sellers description: „The movement has a false winding hole to the left so that the dial is not uneven in appearance.“

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did not read the full description  but that leads the thr franken clock theory a n the fact it’s a BITSA not worth that sort of money anyhow. .   Movement probably.  £30.  Case after butchery. A lot less. Not more than £50. All in as is and even that’s being generous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, oldhippy said:

So you are all coming up with answers some funny. What I want to know is, is it correct and if not what is wrong and what is it called. 

"is it correct"? - I highly doubt it.  I may not know clocks well, but I know several things about it which are incorrect.
"and if not what is wrong"? - Firstly: the price.  The price seems rather wrong.  Secondly: I'm going to say using sub par woodworking skills and probably also a shoehorn to squeeze this...um...er..."sterling" example of the clockmaker's craft into a much smaller case.  
"and what is it called"? - 'abomination' seems rather harsh.  How about 'travesty'?

 

Edited by KarlvonKoln
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What we have here is what is known as a Marriage in the trade. That means a clock case and movement that never started out as one. The case and movement have been altered to fit. But this has a slight difference. It is a three parts marriage because the dial never started out to fit the movement this is because of the two winding holes.

1 The case as you can see has part of the bottom cut away to accommodate the length of the pendulum. This tells you right away nether were made to fit each other. The top of the case has been altered, instead of signs of a handle it has had a piece of wood put inside the top you can see the grain doesn’t match.

2. Movement this in unfinished, It is more likely an apprentice piece. It is easy to see the intention was for the end result to be a strike. If it was to be just a timepiece the design of the train would have been different so the winding arbor would have been at 6 o’clock and not at 3.

3 Dial this is a very nice dial and dates around 1760 the hands are also in keeping with the dial. Due to the lack of photos I cannot see how it has been adapted, but I can assure you it has been altered. 

See what I mean by the top.

 

Thanks for participating and I think you all deserve a bag of peanuts each.

Case Top.jpg

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, oldhippy said:

Anyone who knows about clocks wouldn't buy it. I wouldn't give it house room £300 would be about right. 

That much? It’s not anything good or special in any way, the opposite in my eyes.

 

Tom

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi, I have joined today.  Wales UK.  I came to your "competition" late but agree.  I thought from the start an overpriced marriage.  I am no Horologist but do have 40 years experience dealing in the Antique trade.  I have sold a lot of Arts and Crafts period clocks, both long and short.  I had an excellent Horologist John,  and always relied on his skills to service and restore the movements leaving the cases to my skills.  We have both retired now and I have one or two clocks left in my stock that I never got round to finishing and selling.  This is how I came across your site as I was looking to teach myself how to restore a Gothic revival steal and iron large mantel, or more likely sideboard clock with a relatively common French striking movement.  There aren't any Horologists within 50 miles of where I live in Wales.  I have downloaded your instructions for setting up the strike wheels and intend to take out and try to fix the hour hand wheel that has detached from the drive. Here are some pics I took of the case  a few months ago.  I you are interested I can send pics of the movement later.

20230705_191246.jpg

20230704_181737.jpg

20230707_181557.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Certainly in the style of Gothic. I myself do not like the hands, to heavy looking. If you need held with the movement just ask. You will need quite a few tools and a clock mainspring winder to clean and polish the movement properly. At a stage in my horology days I used to advise a well known Antique shop on what to buy at auctions.     

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Personally I would salvage the missing screws from some donor movement.  I also bought a random selection of screws "Assortment of Stainless Steel Watch Screws" for next to nothing.  As for using an Alum solution - I had great success with that removing a rusted stem from a stainless steel crown.  The best piece of advice I read on doing that was to keep the solution warm so that the reaction didn't take weeks!  I did it in a couple of hours with the solution in jam jar and the jam jar in a saucepan full of water which I left on an induction hob maintaining about 60C in the Alum solution.
    • I decided that it was time to tackle the piece that I'd set aside as my first project. The subject in question is a Gruen Veri-Thin pocket watch.  It winds and "runs".  On the time grapher, it has reasonable amplitude (240 or so depending on the position), but was loosing close to a minute a day.  The stem also has the annoying tendency to just come out when pulled, which makes it super hard to set the thing.  As with many things this one started sideways and just got more so.  I was able to overcome the mangled "tab" on the back case cover (a well placed, very sharp knife enabled me to get in when I couldn't get a purchase on the mangled tab with a case knife.)   I was then sort of shocked to find that one side of the dial was held down with some sort off tape or adhesive material as someone had broken the dial foot screw on that side and left the broken screw in the mail plate. The loose stem does in fact seem to have been a poorly tightened setting lever screw, but I'm afraid there may still be gremlins in the keyless works.  While I was able to get the stem to stay in by putting everything in the right place and tightening the setting lever screw (before I took it all apart for cleaning and inspection), it just didn't seem to all sit right. The final gremlin showed up when I was taking off the lower cap stones for the balance and escape wheel (yes the Gruen 380 seems to have a cape jewel on the escape wheel).  The balance stone came off fine (but that in fact is the smallest screw I've ever seen.  When I turned the movement around to get the one off the escape wheel setting, I found that the screw head had been mostly sheared off.  After some reading and looking at what I had, I decided to try and tease what was left of the screw out of the hole by nudging what was left with the corner of my smallest screwdriver.  After 20 minutes or so, I was able to get the remains of that screw out. The picture I'm including of the disassembled movement was taken before I got the second cap stone off, so in the picture, it's still attached to the main plate (for those looking carefully, you'll only see the one cap setting in the pic.) Now I'm left with: A broken dial screw inside the main plate that needs to come out A broken cap stone retention screw that I have in my parts tray, but that is strictly useless and needs to be replaced. The need to get another dial foot screw I'm contemplating solving the first problem by soaking the main plate in an alum solution.  I think the main plate is brass and shouldn't be affected, but I have not been able to confirm.  This seems like the easiest option as I can't really access both sides of the screw to use the pricey Bergeon tool (which I don't fancy buying unless I have to.) I have located a couple of donor movements and have questions out about whether or not the include the dial foot screw and prompting for pictures of the dial side so  evaluate the cap stone settings.  I've also found that a supplier in this country does have the cap stone settings, but isn't overly clear about whether the screws are included. Are these the types of things that one can scavenge out of assortments or is it best to just grab one of the donors assuming that they look like they have what I need?  
    • I visited this place last year just before they closed their counter service - amazing shop (filled from floor to ceiling!) and the guy that was working there was really knowledgeable and helpful!. Their website isn't as good as Cousins but I understand that if you fill out the contact form they have stuff that isn't on the site. https://gleave.london/mineral-flat-bottom-domed/
    • As always in this game the answer is “it depends “ because the first one worked out ok doesn’t mean all will. A case could be made in a way that it would not really matter much, sounds like your first example. However a case could also be made so that only a tension armoured crystal could be used. Generally you replace like for like to maintain the integrity of the watch.   Tom
    • When can you use a standard crystal to replace one that had a tension ring? The first time I popped a crystal with a tension ring out of a watch I found that I had a suitable sized standard crystal and decided to try that.  It fit nicely and it was hard to see that anything was missing from the watch.  I understand that it probably reduced the water resistance of the watch but since it was an old dress watch it wasn't going for a swim anyway! I have since tried the same thing on another watch and found that the tension ring seemed to have an additional role of holding the dial in place.  With the standard crystal in there the dial and movement falls forward. This means it rattles in the case and falls forward and the hands fowl on the crystal (when the dial is down). Is there a trick I am missing here or does this watch require a special crystal?  I am reluctant to buy an expensive armoured crystal only to find I have the same problem.  
×
×
  • Create New...