Jump to content

timex watches

broccolini
 Share

Recommended Posts

Waggy Distinguished Member

Waggy

Posted
Posted

Practising on a Timex for watchmaking is like practising on a motorcycle to fix cars. They are so far away from any regular Swiss style movements that most learnings and skills you acquire will not be transferrable... At least in my opinion. Also, Timex movements are generally hard to service as they are not made with servicing in mind, so not for a beginner!

There are lots of people who like Timex and I don't mean to knock them, just pointing out that there are better movements to learn on and then graduate to the Timex ones if that is what interests you once you are are familiar with more standard movements.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
rehajm Super WRT Addict

rehajm

Posted
Posted (edited)

I’d say go for it. Yes, they won’t look like better quality movements but you can get accustomed to handling parts and the disassembly/assembly process..well, disassembly anyways…try to treat them like they’re relics…

These things are everywhere in batches and I don’t live near a flea market source so I understand why these are an option.

Edited by rehajm
Link to comment
Share on other sites
HectorLooi Distinguished Member

HectorLooi

Posted
Posted

As long as the dial and bezel look ok, it's a keeper.

I've worked on a few Timexes and I can say that it's not for beginners. Putting back a Timex back together can be really challenging for a beginner. 

But in defense of Timex, they are real tough watches. I've never seen a Timex with a broken pivot or twisted hairspring. There are no jewels to crack or lose.

It will look terrible on a timegrapher but keep great time on your wrist.

Timex... you either love it or hate it. Right? @oldhippy? @JerseyMo?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LittleWatchShop Distinguished Member

LittleWatchShop

Posted
Posted

Great points by all.

Yes they are hard to assemble (as noted by Hector), but you will improve dexterity and handling small parts as rehagm said.  I fixed a couple recently with some satisfaction--I guess because it looks impossible to assemble and then it suddenly comes together--satisfying.

On the other hand, most Swiss watches follow a certain paradigm, so after you do a few and learn the architecture, you are more efficient working on other Swiss watches.  Other than working with small parts, the Timex knowledge is not fungible for broader watch servicing, IMHO.  They are cheap, so there is no downside to working on them.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Neverenoughwatches Distinguished Member

Neverenoughwatches

Posted
Posted
48 minutes ago, broccolini said:

Ok. Thanks.

I'll save these until I have more experience. I'm always a little concerned that I'll destroy something valuable. I assume Timex watches are cheap and not in demand, but sometimes even cheap things are collectible. 😛

Timex do have a fan base and some  can be quite valuable to certain collectors, divers for instance. Here is something you should find interesting especially the movement guides.

https://heritage1854.com/

Link to comment
Share on other sites
JerseyMo Distinguished Member

JerseyMo

Posted
Posted
9 hours ago, HectorLooi said:

As long as the dial and bezel look ok, it's a keeper.

I've worked on a few Timexes and I can say that it's not for beginners. Putting back a Timex back together can be really challenging for a beginner. 

But in defense of Timex, they are real tough watches. I've never seen a Timex with a broken pivot or twisted hairspring. There are no jewels to crack or lose.

It will look terrible on a timegrapher but keep great time on your wrist.

Timex... you either love it or hate it. Right? @oldhippy? @JerseyMo?

I'll defer to oldhippy to comment on virtues of vintage Timex.  🙂 

The Ben Hogan is the one that would draw attention from collectors. But it looks like it is already in pieces.  Is the stem crown still there?

 

Have at it with the others.  Be warned that you will enter into the forbidden realm and may not come back!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Waggy
      Movement holder made with 3D printer

      By Waggy · Posted

      hmmmm.... maybe there is a way to skin that cat 🙀 let me think on it... unless anyone else has any ideas? I left the opening in the side of the base and ring quite large to maybe allow you to grip the crown, but appreciate this may not always be possible, especially for small movements where the crown will not extend past the outer wall of the holder. I noticed this also, but after using the holder for a while I noticed that the ring/holder began to wear into shape (rough edges/bumps worn off) and the size became closer to the desired movement OD. Maybe with some trial and error we could add 0.5 mm (??) to the movement OD to allow for this initial bedding-in?
    • Mallard
      Vintage pocket watches from e-bay (winding stems needed)

      By Mallard · Posted

      Hi nickelsilver, thanks for the great explanation and the links! I'll take a good look in the article.  Especially this is great news to hear! Looking through forums and youtube videos I was informed to 'fist find a case and then fit a movement for it'. But seems that's not the case for pocket watches at least?  I guess I should be looking to find some 'male square bench keys' for now. I was thinking of winding the mainspring using a screwdriver directly, but I found a thread that you've replied on, saying that it could damage the spring. 
    • Waggy
      2813

      By Waggy · Posted

      Murks, The rate and amplitude look OK, and the amplitude should improve once the oils you have used get a chance to move bed-in, also I notice that you are using default 52 degrees for the lift angle, if you get the real lift angle (assuming it's not actually 52) this will change your amplitude - maybe higher, maybe lower. I notice that the beat error is a little high, but not crazy high. At the risk of upsetting the purists, if the balance has an adjustment arm I would go ahead and try and get this <0.3 ms, but if it does not have an adjustable arm then I would probably leave well alone. Just my opinion.
    • Murks
      2813

      By Murks · Posted

      Hi everyone on my timegrapher it showing this do a make anymore adjustment someone let me know ?    
    • Waggy
      Epilame / Fixodrop

      By Waggy · Posted

      Maybe I'm over simplifying this and I'm a little late to the discussion, but just by my looking at oil when I use it on a treated cap jewel  the oil stays in one nice bubble, but when I don't it spreads out to the edges of the jewel. I'm not sure (but could well be wrong) but the analogy of a waxed car and rain is accurate in this case, the wax is very hydrophobic and repels the water, however, the process epilame works by is a different physical process based upon cohesion/adhesion (oleophilic) not repulsion (oleophobic)  at least as far as I have read/observed. If one were to use a oleophobic substance equivalent to wax (hydrophobic) then one would need to create a donut shape to fence in the oil, however if one used such a strategy with a epilame which is oleophilic then the oil would sit on the ring of the donut and not in the 'donut hole', exactly where you don't want it. Even if the oil is smeared then the oleophilic epilame should pull it back to the center (see diagram below). Reference For interest the chemical in epilame is 2-(PERFLUOROHEXYL) ETHYL METHACRYLATE, CAS NO: 2144-53-8
×
×
  • Create New...