Jump to content

Recommended Posts

35 minutes ago, oldhippy said:

HectorLooi is correct. They are for removing the plugs (ends) fro cylinders. A cylinder is made up of three pieces a plug at each end and the center piece 

cylinderescapement.jpg

Thanks OH. So does the pin on the face of the stake slide into the slot at the side of the cylinder and push the plug out from the inside. I think i would never use these.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

So does the pin on the face of the stake slide into the slot at the side of the cylinder and push the plug out from the inside

Yes that is right The set I had the stakes were very thin. I don't know about the ones you posted photos can be very deceiving. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

Thanks OH. So does the pin on the face of the stake slide into the slot at the side of the cylinder and push the plug out from the inside. I think i would never use these.

Your assumption about operation is correct.  The tampons which have the pivots are pressure fitted.  These stakes are the  safest way to remove and replace them without doing damage.  My set of Bergeon stakes look a little different.  I have repaired several cylinder escapement watches and I possess three of them.

As to never knowing if you will use them: in my experience, time will tell.  Prepare to be surprised. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, oldhippy said:

The set I had the stakes were very thin. I don't know about the ones you posted photos can be very deceiving. 

yes the picture makes them look really really big I wonder if they made tower clocks with cylinders?

then they do come in a variety of sizes to correspond to the size the cylinder you have. so yes the cylinder watches could be from pocket-size all the way down to possibly a ladies wristwatch and I'm not sure that people made cylinder staking punches understood that. We had one punch in the staking set it was too big we managed to find a vintage set of bergeon ones and they were all too big and this is a pocket watch. So maybe they were designed for carriage clocks or something much bigger.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • All I do is use a fine marker (sharpie) to put the service date on the back cover, this way it can be removed with some IPA and does no permanent damage to the watch. I'm in two minds about the whole service marking thing, sometimes it's good/bad to see the markings on the watch case back as you know it's been worked on and vice versa. However, if I took my car in for a service and the mechanic scratched some code into the housing of my engine I wouldn't be too impressed. Hence, I think my sharpie solution is a reasonable compromise.
    • hmmmm.... maybe there is a way to skin that cat 🙀 let me think on it... unless anyone else has any ideas? I left the opening in the side of the base and ring quite large to maybe allow you to grip the crown, but appreciate this may not always be possible, especially for small movements where the crown will not extend past the outer wall of the holder. I noticed this also, but after using the holder for a while I noticed that the ring/holder began to wear into shape (rough edges/bumps worn off) and the size became closer to the desired movement OD. Maybe with some trial and error we could add 0.5 mm (??) to the movement OD to allow for this initial bedding-in?
    • Hi nickelsilver, thanks for the great explanation and the links! I'll take a good look in the article.  Especially this is great news to hear! Looking through forums and youtube videos I was informed to 'fist find a case and then fit a movement for it'. But seems that's not the case for pocket watches at least?  I guess I should be looking to find some 'male square bench keys' for now. I was thinking of winding the mainspring using a screwdriver directly, but I found a thread that you've replied on, saying that it could damage the spring. 
    • Murks, The rate and amplitude look OK, and the amplitude should improve once the oils you have used get a chance to move bed-in, also I notice that you are using default 52 degrees for the lift angle, if you get the real lift angle (assuming it's not actually 52) this will change your amplitude - maybe higher, maybe lower. I notice that the beat error is a little high, but not crazy high. At the risk of upsetting the purists, if the balance has an adjustment arm I would go ahead and try and get this <0.3 ms, but if it does not have an adjustable arm then I would probably leave well alone. Just my opinion.
    • Hi everyone on my timegrapher it showing this do a make anymore adjustment someone let me know ?    
×
×
  • Create New...