Jump to content

What is too much wear in a jewel hole ?


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, VWatchie said:

Interesting question and now that you mention it I don't think I've ever heard anyone mention jewel-bearing wear. Yes, cap jewels for sure and I've seen it several times (the famous dimple). I'm not sure, and I could be imagining, but I think I've seen jewel holes slightly oval-shaped. Could that be a worn hole? 🤔

I've seen oval shaped holes too. So unless it's a manufacturing defect, it must be wear of the jewel.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, VWatchie said:

What I've done when I've seen excessive side shake is burnish the pivot (slightly Coca-Cola bottle-shaped pivot) and replace the jewel.

See  🧐        Coca-Cola has found its way into watch repair, more than we give it credit for. 

 

 

 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I remember reading about carbide formation in steel during heat treatment; it's a normal part of the process. The article (lost to the internets) mentioned something about the possibility of pocket concentrations of certain carbides or something, and in discussion with folks smarter than I it was suggested that this could be the cause of jewel wear under certain circumstances. I see that silicon carbide has a Mohs hardness of 9-10, so it could wear ruby (Mohs 9), and silicon is a normal alloying element in steel (it's in Sandvik 20AP, the common steel used for turned watch parts). Whether that silicon does form silicon carbide (apparenly "primary silicon carbide" is actually used as a silicon source for steel making), or occasionally does, or occasionally does and forms "pockets" that can wear ruby, is beyond my pay scale.

 

Logically I have to go with Frank on this one. I worked on new production pieces for a well known complications maker some years back, and this caliber was well known for wearing the cap jewels very quickly. The old time watchmakers there told me to always clean the bejesus out of the balance pivots, with dense pegwood, screwing the end of the pegwood (soaked in benzine) down on the pivot a dozen times or so. Just to see, I tried leaving a balance un-pegwooded, and after just a few weeks the cap jewels showed wear, where the treated pivots didn't wear the cap jewels at all. So some kind of contamination with abrasive at the factory level? Would have to be aluminum oxide at least, or diamond.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Maybe it's just a coincidence, but note how the epilame-treated surface is illustrated in @Waggy's post. It looks like the oil is exposed to a binder (epilame!) so that it can't move sideways.
    • The epilame under the oil will also be removed  Unless the oil makes a barrier between the epilame and the escape teeth 😅 I think i need two strong coffees now 🤣
    • If we use the rub-off epilame method of pallet stones (run dry for a few minutes before applying the epilame) where will the oil go/be transported when it is pushed away from the impulse surface by the escape wheel teeth? Onto the epilame-treated sections of the pallet! Once the oil has been applied/transported to the epilame-treated sections of the pallet where will it then go? Nowhere as the oil will remain on the epilame. So, perhaps the run-dry method defeats its intended purpose leaving the pallet impulse surfaces dry!? If, on the other hand, we do not remove the epilame from the pallet stones where the escape wheel teeth come in contact with them I'd expect more oil to remain where we want it and need it. Yes, I agree, that is the question, and my gut feeling tells me that is exactly the case. Epilame was created to have an adhesive trait and the oleophobic property is just a side effect.  
    • Might that be the viscous nature of oil resisting gravity H  ,  we have been comparing water and hydrophobic surfaces which are similar in principle but water is much less viscous than oil. I guess what we trying to discover is if epilame also has an adhesive trait as well as being oleophobic. Plus the oil dropet has very little mass for gravity to work on, like watching tiny water beads that can grip onto vertical glass until they are connected together to increase their mass then run down. Gravity isn't the only factor at play when oil is placed on pallet stones. The oil receives a lot of bashing that may push it out of position ? Thinking about it if the oil stays in position for 10 minutes enough time for the escape wheel to scrape off the epilame , then  a walled in lubrication has been achieved,  the epilame is no longer beneath the oil ( possibly mixed into the oil )
    • But it also makes it seem less susceptible to gravity. If you place a droplet of oil on an epilame-treated surface the droplet of oil will still stay in place even if you then flip the surface from a horizontal to a vertical position. That is, the oil droplet remains anchored, and that's the purpose of epilame. If it was just a matter of creating an oleophobic surface we could probably use other, less expensive, methods!? I don't know @Waggy but my gut feeling tells me you're spot on (pun intended!). I believe the oleophobic property is a side effect of epilame which is designed to keep the oil anchored.
×
×
  • Create New...