Jump to content

What is too much wear in a jewel hole ?


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, VWatchie said:

Interesting question and now that you mention it I don't think I've ever heard anyone mention jewel-bearing wear. Yes, cap jewels for sure and I've seen it several times (the famous dimple). I'm not sure, and I could be imagining, but I think I've seen jewel holes slightly oval-shaped. Could that be a worn hole? 🤔

I've seen oval shaped holes too. So unless it's a manufacturing defect, it must be wear of the jewel.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, VWatchie said:

What I've done when I've seen excessive side shake is burnish the pivot (slightly Coca-Cola bottle-shaped pivot) and replace the jewel.

See  🧐        Coca-Cola has found its way into watch repair, more than we give it credit for. 

 

 

 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I remember reading about carbide formation in steel during heat treatment; it's a normal part of the process. The article (lost to the internets) mentioned something about the possibility of pocket concentrations of certain carbides or something, and in discussion with folks smarter than I it was suggested that this could be the cause of jewel wear under certain circumstances. I see that silicon carbide has a Mohs hardness of 9-10, so it could wear ruby (Mohs 9), and silicon is a normal alloying element in steel (it's in Sandvik 20AP, the common steel used for turned watch parts). Whether that silicon does form silicon carbide (apparenly "primary silicon carbide" is actually used as a silicon source for steel making), or occasionally does, or occasionally does and forms "pockets" that can wear ruby, is beyond my pay scale.

 

Logically I have to go with Frank on this one. I worked on new production pieces for a well known complications maker some years back, and this caliber was well known for wearing the cap jewels very quickly. The old time watchmakers there told me to always clean the bejesus out of the balance pivots, with dense pegwood, screwing the end of the pegwood (soaked in benzine) down on the pivot a dozen times or so. Just to see, I tried leaving a balance un-pegwooded, and after just a few weeks the cap jewels showed wear, where the treated pivots didn't wear the cap jewels at all. So some kind of contamination with abrasive at the factory level? Would have to be aluminum oxide at least, or diamond.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Getting back to the issue which is us guys repairing or just enjoying horological exploits. The big worry now is how sound is Cousins as company going forward. The of cost if this 8 year legal battle will be astronomical. Cut backs will happen noticed already how the Cousins catalogue is half its size this year. The main supplier going out of business will hit the UK horological community in a big way.    On the Brexit issue it was about a sovereign country being able to make its own laws and trade with any country in the world. I cannot see what was wrong with this. For those who wish to re join the cost would be very high indeed.
    • Yes, it's the same (old) song and it's getting worse & worse;  
    • 🤔 leaving the EU meant that UK was no longer part of the convention and have already been turned down an independent reapplication. I'm pretty sure courts have to be held in Switzerland in this case. There will be a lot more watches stashed away in draws  tbh, folk wont be able to afford to maintain them. Cheap watches will be bought and top end watches by folk with plenty of cash that can pay for service and repair. The expensive once in a lifetime gifts and everything else inbetween will be at the forgotton when they stop working. I know i was being a numpty, get used to it 😄 Anybody that knows will boycott them, but besides repairers who will know. Nope will never buy one, i made that decision as soon as i learnt about this. 
    • although not in this case.  It was the Lugano Convention and its deficiencies that allowed a Swiss court decision in the first place.  This isnt really a Brexit issue at all.  A decision that affects both the EU and the UK should never have been heard in Switzerland. I bet the authorised service centres in the UK are pretty pleased.  It's a massive shame, though; I believe watch owners should be able to choose to have their watch serviced by whoever they trust.
    • Hi guys I think that old hippy is correct, it opens the gates for china to manufacture aftermarket spare parts. considering that they already do work on behalf of the Swiss I guess this decision gives the a little more legitimacy to tool up and I am sure they will take advantage of the situation either with or without the blessing of the Swiss watch industry  Having read about the protectionist machinations of the Swiss in the history of Europe they were the only ones to get fat at everybody else’s expense. I think the outcome could have been guessed at but ,  fair play to Cousins UK for standing up to them.  Now the question,  will everybody boycott Swiss watches and Swatch, no way they will still fill their coffers.  Me I stick with the Japanese once renowned for cheap shitty watches who came good through industrial effort and don’t for get the Russians that most dismiss as low grade crap. Wouldn’t buy a swatch product ever how about you all.? a
×
×
  • Create New...