Jump to content

Mathey Tissot unmarked movement?


Recommended Posts

Hey guys, I am working on a WWII era Mathey-Tissot military watch with a movement that has no calibre marks or anything. It is engraved "Mathey-Tissot" "Fifteen 15 Jewels" "Unadjusted" and has a serial number of 25324. I cannot find any information about these Mathey-Tissot military watches and I have only found 1 other Mathey-Tissot watch with the movement. If anyone could help me figure it out, that would be much appreciated! It kind of has the design of a Valjoux series, so maybe something like that.

316642712_s-l400(17).jpg.63709f23fe2c8a5b976d23741885f9c9.jpg

This is the other movement I found, they look the same

16816696619814524985293869925137.thumb.jpg.e72364be62c83dac40f410d630713528.jpg

And this is a picture of the main plate and only bridge. No markings on either side of the baseplate

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mikepilk said:

Nice! I've never seen one of those before. It looks like a Lemania S27

http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?10&ranfft&2&2uswk&Lemania_S27

 

I did a little Google searching and found that this is it. I'm kinda kicking myself because I saw the movement earlier when researching and didn't think it could be it, but I guess I learned to never overlook anything. Thanks so much!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, RichardHarris123 said:

I take it, they are rare and high quality? 

I don't know about rare, but I think Lemania are considered good. If you look at the Ranfft link, there are chronograph versions using this base movement CH27. Which would explain the big flat barrel bridge. They take drive from the third (?) wheel which sits above the bridge. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, RichardHarris123 said:

Maybe going off tangent here but some watches have more than on barrel.  Assuming a chronograph runs off of one barrel, would the spring have to be more powerful, to over more friction 

Though chrongraph activation causes some drop in amplitude, but I think in  selecting  mainspring one would be mainly concerned with amplitude of the base movement, as use of chronograph is usually temporary.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I visited the Breguet Exhibition today. https://www.sciencemuseum.org.uk/about-us/press-office/rare-timepieces-unveiled-new-display-science-museum The Science Museum now holds the collection of "The Worshipful Company of Clockmakers" - "The collection includes more than 600 watches, 90 clocks, 30 marine chronometers and a number of fine sundials and examples of hand engraving, mapping the history of innovation in watch and clock making in London from 1600 to the present day." It's well worth a visit. They have some amazing pieces by the likes of Harrison, Breguet, Tompion etc . I've visited twice before but decided to go and see the Breguet Exhibition. Maybe I was expecting too much, as on reflection, "More than 20 extraordinary timepieces designed by inventor and watchmaker Abraham-Louis Breguet " isn't going to take up that much space. In reality, it's just one cabinet. But, Oh those watches, stunning 🤩 , e.g. (No 1297 was made for George III and is valued about £1m)   I tried a couple of pics, but with subdued lighting and taking through glass, they aren't good. I like thin hands on a watch - how about these (I think this is a split second chrono)   And this one, with all it's complications, is only 10mm thick !   What I found very interesting were a few very old machines for making watch parts, like this 17th Century gear cutter. The disc below has concentric rings with holes in, so that is can be set to cut varying teeth numbers.       
    • Firstly sorry for poor image quality I only have an iPhone for photos.    Im working on a 512 movement and I’ve had some trouble with the “jewels”. I’ve got the metal one out, but when I tried to put it back the three sides of the spring seem to need pressing all at once to fit it as there are three “holes”. I get two corners in but as I go for the third the first two pop out! Constantly I’ve lost the spring. I’ve done the similar ones on seiko movements without trouble. Assuming I find it/a replacement, what am I missing!   on the other side with the only ruby in the movement is a setting with no “gap”at all. How do I get the spring out, and of course get it back in!    What am I missing!    thanks in advance.    Rob
    • Links like that are the reason I routinely donate to the Internet Archive - they are the last safe house for a tremendous amount of useful info that is otherwise lost.
    • There must be a ring around the movement that is not a part of the case and the movement will get out together with the ring.
×
×
  • Create New...