Jump to content

2x Barlow lens yes/no ?


Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, HectorLooi said:

I set my table at 75cm high. But I have tiltable microscope mount and I tilt it back about 15 to 20 degrees, so that brings the eyepieces lower and I don't have to peer down the eyepiece. And when working on the movement, the tilt allows longer tools to fit under the lenses. The tilt also prevents the hands from blocking the view. I highly recommend getting a tiltable mount.

That would be very nice .........

empty-pocket.thumb.jpg.3b4c4eb5665df3565aab49cc3cc4f62b.jpg

Edited by Endeavor
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Endeavor said:

I'm not aware if my table with 76cm is particularly high? With the 0.5x barlow lens and a movement in the movement-holder underneath, adjusted sharp, the distance from table-top to the top-edge of the eye-pieces is 50cm. With my adjustable chair in the highest position, I can just look down the microscope but I've to sit (uncomfortably) on the edge of the chair.  The base of the microscope stand takes already 5cm (it all adds up!). Without the base, it would probably have been okay, but that's not how it is. So, with my current setup, the 0.5x Barlow doesn't work well for me (1.84mtr).

My table is the same height, 76cm.  I have the head on an articulated arm, which gives a height to the centre of the eyepieces as 42cm.  I can see why you have problems at 50cm. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Endeavor said:

I'm not aware if my table with 76cm is particularly high? With the 0.5x barlow lens and a movement in the movement-holder underneath, adjusted sharp, the distance from table-top to the top-edge of the eye-pieces is 50cm. With my adjustable chair in the highest position, I can just look down the microscope but I've to sit (uncomfortably) on the edge of the chair.  The base of the microscope stand takes already 5cm (it all adds up!). Without the base, it would probably have been okay, but that's not how it is. So, with my current setup, the 0.5x Barlow doesn't work well for me (1.84mtr).

You are relatively tall 6'1" ish . A cushion on the seat of your chair ?

1 hour ago, tomh207 said:

Fantastic idea Tom

28 minutes ago, Endeavor said:

That would be very nice .........

empty-pocket.thumb.jpg.3b4c4eb5665df3565aab49cc3cc4f62b.jpg

I know how you feel mate, i spent a small fortune on this hobby last month.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

A cushion on the seat of your chair ?

I came with another idea 😆

442356691_tableseat.thumb.jpeg.b27743dc5b96b624cfa5e83ae36ca9e1.jpeg

 

Anyhow, a long story short; so far I'm very happy without a Barlow lens and without one, everything is at a perfect height. Currently I can't see the cost / benefit doing all kinds of trick just to be able to use a 0.5x Barlow lens. With my current setup the lens doesn't work and that is, as far as I'm concerned, it.

However, I'll keep all your gratefully received suggestions in mind, this in case I stumble over another setup option.

So, a BIG thank you 😉

 

Edited by Endeavor
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, HectorLooi said:

I set my table at 75cm high. But I have tiltable microscope mount and I tilt it back about 15 to 20 degrees, so that brings the eyepieces lower and I don't have to peer down the eyepiece. And when working on the movement, the tilt allows longer tools to fit under the lenses. The tilt also prevents the hands from blocking the view. I highly recommend getting a tiltable mount.

No offers to show us your workspace then Hector. Did you conveniently forget or avoid it. Come on your have 3 tables in there, who of us has 3 tables in our watchrooms. If its special we want to see it matey. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Endeavor said:

The base of the microscope stand takes already 5cm (it all adds up!). 

That's the difference. If my scope were 5cm higher, I'd need to adjust my seat up to be able to use it. Does the base create any ergonomic issues with your hands? It seems like a small 5cm shelf around the movement holder would be pretty annoying and set up some awkward wrist angles. Especially if you're having a long work session.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, spectre6000 said:

Does the base create any ergonomic issues with your hands? It seems like a small 5cm shelf around the movement holder would be pretty annoying and set up some awkward wrist angles. Especially if you're having a long work session.

If one were to work continuously under the microscope, perhaps yes. But I'm not, that was not the purpose of me buying the microscope.

Edited by Endeavor
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

No offers to show us your workspace then Hector. Did you conveniently forget or avoid it. Come on your have 3 tables in there, who of us has 3 tables in our watchrooms. If its special we want to see it matey. 

Eh, me but they are all covered with watchmaking tools and computer stuff, oh electronics as well. Much clutter, I do need to put up some shelves to make space to work.

 

Tom

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, tomh207 said:

Eh, me but they are all covered with watchmaking tools and computer stuff, oh electronics as well. Much clutter, I do need to put up some shelves to make space to work.

 

Tom

I'm  catching up, i have two and a chest of drawers full of stock. I just love seeing how other folk arrange their spaces. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

I'm  catching up, i have two and a chest of drawers full of stock. I just love seeing how other folk arrange their spaces. 

I would not call mine “arranged” at the moment Rich 😂

 

Tom

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

No offers to show us your workspace then Hector. Did you conveniently forget or avoid it. Come on your have 3 tables in there, who of us has 3 tables in our watchrooms. If its special we want to see it matey. 

It's still a works in progress. It was my parent's room and it still has some of their old stuff and junk accumulated over the years.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thought I had to share this - last time I cleaned out a deep fat fryer there was less mess than this. Another pin pallet movement. Unsurprisingly dunking it in Castrol GTX didn't fix the broken mainspring which is the only issue I've found.    Any tips for the dial? Also covered in oil.  Cleaned up quite nicely
    • Hi Nev . No i didn't try this balance in the movement as it didn't run and the deformed staff broke when i removed the roller. Problem is what i think is the correct staff for this movement, the hub seat, roller and collet profiles are all too small for those parts of the assembly. The movement listed on Ranfft's site is correct my movement and the nos staffs i have match the ronda measurements. I can only assume that the wheel , roller and collet openings have all been broached to make them fit an oversized staff, both staff pivots had also been modified. 
    • Yes, threw it on the demagnetizer before I cleaned it to be sure.  This picture doesn't show it well, but I can definitely see liquid where the turns meet up.
    • My newest 404 candidate, a late '60's / early '70's Waltham with a UTC 33 / Seiko 6601 17 jewel automatic movement. It needed a new crystal and I put on a strap from my Strap Graveyard. The timegrapher was a snow storm before servicing but it cleaned up nicely. I really like the funky font used for the hour markers.
    • Hi Rich, the main problem with the balance is if the roller is from this movement. Did Yoy try if the balance interacted correctly with the lever? You can use suitable (by size) balance/hairspring couple from You pile of balances, but the roller must be for this lever (original for the calibre). Not that making roller is impossible, but it is easier to have one.
×
×
  • Create New...