Jump to content

Never seen one like this, without a pallet fork that is


Recommended Posts

Evening,

This came in a job lot, and I thought I'd have a crack at a ladies watch. Mostly as it's a little bigger than a lot of others. Looked in good shape with a rolled gold back to it. As a guess 1940s ish?

20221215_175257.thumb.jpg.a88eaead7841c6d59e95baff94003c51.jpg

 

 

20221215_175343.thumb.jpg.b599d45b771677e639468038efdc8488.jpg

 

20221215_180748.thumb.jpg.69f2d095ad973f04c4707dd898e1dbd4.jpg

What really caught me by surprise was the fact it doesn't have a pallet fork. I thought fairly unusual after I realised that I'd not lost anything, it was never there to begin with. Anybody else seen one like this? Does it have a particular technical name for type of movement?

20221215_182239.thumb.jpg.2bdf93e931fe9b3f37a575a2b04210cb.jpg

 

20221215_183348.thumb.jpg.0fbfa9e854b348c55735e6693211d1bf.jpg

Which left me wondering as to who the maker is and it's real age. There are two marks, something that looks like a "TR" contained in a shield and "AS175".

Looking on the ole interweb I think it's possibly an A.Schild. Have I identified it correctly?

20221215_180814.thumb.jpg.8b397f34b117a6f53d6dd91a8975abfd.jpg

20221215_180822.thumb.jpg.71cf6944a232573c25ea90a34918a10a.jpg

Thanks in advance for any insights.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Bearman said:

What really caught me by surprise was the fact it doesn't have a pallet fork. I thought fairly unusual after I realised that I'd not lost anything, it was never there to begin with. Anybody else seen one like this? Does it have a particular technical name for type of movement?

I think Its called a " cylinder escapement"     have one that hasn't been serviced in past forty years but starts and runs as soon as you wind.

Rgds

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As @Nucejoesays, that's a cylinder escapement. The only one I've ever worked on was also in a ladies' movement, which was super tiny. Really interesting mechanism!

As for the maker's mark, looks like "Ebauches Trust" to me:

image.png.b002da1449cb8eedd6d8e35ab4f358e8.png

I found these pictures with a web search for "mechanical watch manufacturer stamp."

image.thumb.png.0e8f097d30a0027c6da7104ec8eb355a.pngimage.thumb.png.08bc44158fdaa2112005f3b1bff46d94.pngimage.thumb.png.812aa89c5195fc4ea77ab0639ef72f29.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, cylinder escapement. Hard to time on a lot of modern timing equipment but member praezis has a killer software that will pick up all sorts of escapements (and is Witschi level+ otherwise).

 

Very important to have all power off before removing balance. Otherwise business as usual, lubricate escapement with 9415.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks all, I've since found a few youtube videos on the cylinder escapement, really interesting. You learn something new all the time. 

@ManSkirtBrewthanks for confirming my suspicions regarding "Ebauches Trust" I reckon the watch is probably 1930's now. Done some digging on the history of them and it seems they were a forerunner to what is now ETA with a link to a number of makers back then.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yes, I was referring to the (jewelled) gear train with HP (most of the time, I use 1300, but when Rolex says 1000, I'll use 1000).
    • did I miss the update of the message of something changing?      
    • I suppose it would depend upon what your lubricating with those? for instance what does the manufacturer say about those lubricants? I have a PDF from the manufacture and a rather peculiar statement found on the bottom of the chart. my suspicion is the reason the recommending would be without epilam the HP oils like the spread except when they're in Ruby jewel's with steel pivots. tableEN lubrication 2020.pdf
    • These types of hairsprings become weak with age and very fragile. Which I expect it is that giving you trouble, and that wheel is not the correct one, if it were not bent I don't think the movement would run as the teeth are not the correct height. The problem you have is price which depends on you. It can be repaired but is it worth it to you, because there is little value in the clock. A wheel can be made and hairspring replaced. Or hang on to it and keep looking on ebay which is your best bet for replacement parts or even a complete movement but it will be like finding a needle in a haystack. 
    • I did that also for a few movements - well, mainly in/around the train jewels. I made big efforts to epilame the mainplate WITHOUT getting Epilame into the Pallet fork jewels (where it's not supposed to be, right?). I made litte barriers with Rodico around that jewel and used drops from a syringe to apply on the rest.  However, I've now stopped doing this. For three reasons: 1. It's a hassle and consumes more of this liquid gold. 2. I didn't see the need when using HP1000/HP1300 lubricants and grease for most part. The two places where I'd use 9010 (i.e. escape wheel and balance) receive Epilame in specific places... or the cap-jewel-setting of the balance suspends the oil sufficiently be capillary action (see my "conflict" about using Epilame on the balance jewels).  3. Lastly, and here I really wonder about yours and others' experiences: I felt that applying Epliame to the train jewels left them looking hazy (borderline dirty) compared to the (painstakingly achieved) sparkly clean results of my cleaning process. I just can't help but think that the Epilame residuals would mix with the oil and cause more friction/wear. I don't know.    simple: it'll stay there. It won't move any further. That's exactly what is happening if you epilame a cap stone. You end up placing the 9010 right on top of the epilame and the oil will sit nicely on that spot.
×
×
  • Create New...